Suppr超能文献

选择性剖宫产子宫切除术与经阴道子宫切除术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的比较

Elective cesarean hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

作者信息

McNulty B, Roberts W S

出版信息

South Med J. 1987 Aug;80(8):984-6. doi: 10.1097/00007611-198708000-00012.

Abstract

We retrospectively compared elective cesarean hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Sixteen patients had cesarean hysterectomy and 53 had vaginal hysterectomy. There were no deaths in either group and no neonatal complications in the cesarean hysterectomy group. Major and minor complications were comparable in the two groups except that urinary tract infection was statistically more common in the cesarean hysterectomy group. The mean hospital stay for the two groups was comparable. The estimated blood loss and transfusion rate were higher in the cesarean hysterectomy group. The transfusion rate was probably artificially increased because of overzealous intraoperative transfusion. Elective cesarean hysterectomy does not cause unacceptably high morbidity, and it is an acceptable alternative to interval vaginal hysterectomy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in poorly compliant patients.

摘要

我们回顾性比较了择期剖宫产子宫切除术和经阴道子宫切除术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的情况。16例患者接受了剖宫产子宫切除术,53例接受了经阴道子宫切除术。两组均无死亡病例,剖宫产子宫切除术组无新生儿并发症。除剖宫产子宫切除术组尿路感染在统计学上更为常见外,两组的主要和次要并发症相当。两组的平均住院时间相当。剖宫产子宫切除术组的估计失血量和输血率更高。输血率可能因术中过度积极输血而人为升高。择期剖宫产子宫切除术不会导致不可接受的高发病率,对于依从性差的宫颈上皮内瘤变患者,它是间隔期经阴道子宫切除术的可接受替代方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验