• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

越南版牙科恐惧调查的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and Reliability of the Vietnamese Version of the Dental Fear Survey.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

出版信息

Int Dent J. 2023 Apr;73(2):311-318. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.07.009. Epub 2022 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.identj.2022.07.009
PMID:36167609
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10023590/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The use of questionnaires to assess patients' dental fear is critical to dental research and practice. As one of the most well-established tools in this field, the Dental Fear Survey (DFS) was translated into Vietnamese (V-DFS) and employed in previous studies. However, its validity and reliability have not been reported. This study aimed to determine the validity and reliability of V-DFS in adults.

METHODS

The DFS was translated to Vietnamese in accordance with the "Guideline for the Process of Cross-cultural Adaptation of Self-reported Measures" to create the V-DFS. Next, 414 students at Pham Ngoc Thach University of Medicine completed the V-DFS to examine its validity and reliability. The factorial validity of V-DFS was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and structural equation modeling (SEM). The internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the V-DFS were assessed using Cronbach's alpha (α), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficient (r).

RESULTS

The rotated component matrix of the EFA revealed 3 factors: specific stimuli, anticipatory fear and avoidance, and physiologic arousal. The statistical indices of the best-fitting V-DFS model in SEM analysis satisfied the cutoff values. Cronbach's α ranged from .82 to .94 for the 3 factors. The ICC and r of the whole questionnaire were .86 and .86, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

DFS was successfully translated into Vietnamese with good validity and reliability. Further research should be conducted to examine its validity in various populations and to improve its characteristics.

摘要

目的

使用问卷评估患者的牙科恐惧对牙科研究和实践至关重要。作为该领域最成熟的工具之一,牙科恐惧量表(DFS)已被翻译成越南语(V-DFS)并在先前的研究中使用。然而,其有效性和可靠性尚未得到报道。本研究旨在确定 V-DFS 在成年人中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

根据“自报告措施跨文化适应过程指南”将 DFS 翻译为越南语,创建 V-DFS。接下来,414 名 Pham Ngoc Thach 医科大学的学生完成了 V-DFS,以检验其有效性和可靠性。使用探索性因子分析(EFA)和结构方程建模(SEM)评估 V-DFS 的因子有效性。使用 Cronbach's alpha(α)、组内相关系数(ICC)和 Spearman 秩相关系数(r)评估 V-DFS 的内部一致性和重测信度。

结果

EFA 的旋转成分矩阵显示出 3 个因素:特定刺激、预期恐惧和回避以及生理唤醒。SEM 分析中最佳拟合 V-DFS 模型的统计指标满足了截止值。3 个因素的 Cronbach's α 范围为.82 至.94。整个问卷的 ICC 和 r 分别为.86 和.86。

结论

DFS 已成功翻译成越南语,具有良好的有效性和可靠性。应进一步研究其在各种人群中的有效性,并改善其特征。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c120/10023590/10b4289a0166/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c120/10023590/1c80207e76ac/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c120/10023590/10b4289a0166/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c120/10023590/1c80207e76ac/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c120/10023590/10b4289a0166/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Vietnamese Version of the Dental Fear Survey.越南版牙科恐惧调查的有效性和可靠性。
Int Dent J. 2023 Apr;73(2):311-318. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.07.009. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Lebanese Arabic version of the Dental Fear Survey: a cross-sectional study.黎巴嫩阿拉伯语版牙科恐惧调查量表的心理测量评估:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 18;21(1):651. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02015-y.
3
Assessment of the psychometric properties of the Vietnamese version of the Critical Thinking Disposition Scale.评估越南版批判性思维倾向量表的心理测量特性。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Aug;127:105848. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105848. Epub 2023 May 23.
4
The Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale among Dental Outpatients.改良牙科焦虑量表日文版在牙科门诊患者中的信度和效度
ScientificWorldJournal. 2020 May 1;2020:8734946. doi: 10.1155/2020/8734946. eCollection 2020.
5
Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 Among Patients Who Have Undergone Total Knee Arthroplasty.中文版 Tampa 运动恐惧量表-11 在全膝关节置换术后患者中的跨文化适应性、信度和效度。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jun;34(6):1116-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.076. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
6
Reliability and validity of the Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale for Arabic-speaking children: a cross-sectional study.阿拉伯语儿童牙科恐惧调查问卷子量表对说阿拉伯语儿童的信度和效度:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2016 Apr 14;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0205-0.
7
Dental Fear Survey: a cross-sectional study evaluating the psychometric properties of the Brazilian Portuguese version.牙科恐惧调查:一项评估巴西葡萄牙语版本心理测量特性的横断面研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:725323. doi: 10.1155/2014/725323. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
8
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Dental Fear Survey.《牙科恐惧调查问卷》韩文版的信度和效度
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jun;15(2):85-92. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2015.15.2.85. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
9
Reliability and cross-cultural validity of a Japanese version of the Dental Fear Survey.日本版牙科恐惧调查问卷的信度和跨文化效度
BMC Oral Health. 2009 Jul 10;9:17. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-9-17.
10
Adaptation and Validation of the Vietnamese Translated Diabetes Knowledge Questionnaire.越南文版糖尿病知识问卷的调适与验证。
J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2022;37(1):38-45. doi: 10.15605/jafes.037.01.08. Epub 2022 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of Providing Advance Notice and Stress-Coping Traits on Physiological Stress of Patients during Dental Treatment.提供预先通知和应对压力特质对牙科治疗期间患者生理压力的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(5):2540. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052540.
2
Psychometric evaluation of the Lebanese Arabic version of the Dental Fear Survey: a cross-sectional study.黎巴嫩阿拉伯语版牙科恐惧调查量表的心理测量评估:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 18;21(1):651. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02015-y.
3
Evaluating factors associated with fear and anxiety to dental treatment-A systematic review.
评估与牙科治疗恐惧和焦虑相关的因素——一项系统综述。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):4530-4535. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_607_20. eCollection 2020 Sep.
4
Relationship between preoperative dental anxiety and short-term inflammatory response following oral surgery.术前牙科焦虑与口腔手术后短期炎症反应的关系。
Aust Dent J. 2021 Mar;66(1):13-19. doi: 10.1111/adj.12796. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
5
Quantifying the qualities of language.量化语言的特性。
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232198. eCollection 2020.
6
An Introduction to Assessing Dental Fear and Anxiety in Children.儿童牙科恐惧与焦虑评估导论。
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Apr 4;8(2):86. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020086.
7
Verification of the Korean Version of the Dental Fear Survey.《牙科恐惧调查问卷》韩文版的验证
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Dec;19(6):361-367. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.6.361. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
8
The potential of heart rate variability for exploring dental anxiety in mandibular third molar surgery.心率变异性在探索下颌第三磨牙手术中牙科焦虑方面的潜力。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jun;47(6):809-815. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
9
Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Dental Fear Survey.《牙科恐惧调查问卷》韩文版的信度和效度
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jun;15(2):85-92. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2015.15.2.85. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
10
Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches.社会与健康科学研究中问卷效度与信度测试的原则和方法
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015 Oct-Dec;22(4):195-201. doi: 10.4103/1117-1936.173959.