Farooqui Mudassir, Suriya Sajid, Quadri Syed, Baig Aqsa, Khalil Mohammad Hamza, Liaquat Ayesha, Taqi Asif
Neurology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA.
Neurology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Aug 24;14(8):e28348. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28348. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Background The outcome of mechanical thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion (LVO) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is time-dependent. In the current stroke workflow, the pre-hospital delay is one of the most common reasons for an increase in door-to-groin puncture time (DGPT). In the present study, we sought to compare the difference in (DGPT) before and after the implementation of the Ventura Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Score (VES) protocol for LVO. Methods VES was implemented in the Ventura County of California by Emergency Medical Services (EMS). We performed a retrospective analysis to compare DGPT of patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) pre- and post-VES implementation. Mean and standard deviation was reported for the continuous variable 'time for intra-arterial (IA) treatment' in minutes. The Mann-Whitney test was used for the comparison of the variable between the two groups. analyses were performed using SAS v9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) with a significant p-value of ≤0.05. Results A total of 304 (males: 142 and females: 162) patients were alerted of the stroke code by the EMS. VES was positive in 139 patients. Of these, 64 (46%) were males and 75 (54%) were females. VES score of 1, 2, 3, and 4 were recorded in 57 (41%), 44 (31.6%), 31 (22.3%), and 7 (5%) patients, respectively. A total of 48 VES-positive patients underwent EVT. There were 62 patients who underwent EVT before the implementation of the VES protocol. The mean DGPT for the EVT among post-VES patients was 65 minutes, which was significantly (p=0.0009) shorter than the mean DGPT of 109 minutes among pre-VES patients. Conclusion VES is a simplified and effective tool for identifying LVO in the field. Implementation of VES showed significantly reduced DGPT in LVO patients.
背景 急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者大血管闭塞(LVO)的机械取栓结果与时间相关。在当前的卒中救治流程中,院前延误是导致门至股动脉穿刺时间(DGPT)增加的最常见原因之一。在本研究中,我们试图比较实施用于LVO的文图拉紧急大血管闭塞评分(VES)方案前后的(DGPT)差异。方法 加利福尼亚州文图拉县的紧急医疗服务(EMS)实施了VES。我们进行了一项回顾性分析,以比较VES实施前后接受血管内治疗(EVT)患者的DGPT。以分钟为单位报告连续变量“动脉内(IA)治疗时间”的均值和标准差。使用曼-惠特尼检验比较两组之间的变量。使用SAS v9.4(SAS Institute Inc.,卡里,北卡罗来纳州)进行分析,显著p值≤0.05。结果 共有304例(男性:142例,女性:162例)患者被EMS发出卒中警报。139例患者的VES为阳性。其中,64例(46%)为男性,75例(54%)为女性。分别有57例(41%)、44例(31.6%)、31例(22.3%)和7例(5%)患者的VES评分为1、2、3和4。共有48例VES阳性患者接受了EVT。在VES方案实施前有62例患者接受了EVT。VES方案实施后接受EVT患者的平均DGPT为65分钟,显著短于(p=0.0009)VES方案实施前患者平均109分钟的DGPT。结论 VES是一种在现场识别LVO既简化又有效的工具。VES的实施显著缩短了LVO患者的DGPT。