Suppr超能文献

在德国,接受血栓切除术的中风患者的治疗时间如何影响功能结局?来自德国中风登记处的结果。

How do treatment times impact on functional outcome in stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy in Germany? Results from the German Stroke Registry.

机构信息

Klinik und Hochschulambulanz für Neurologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.

Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Stroke. 2021 Oct;16(8):953-961. doi: 10.1177/1747493020985260. Epub 2021 Jan 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional outcome post-stroke depends on time to recanalization. Effect of in-hospital delay may differ in patients directly admitted to a comprehensive stroke center and patients transferred via a primary stroke center. We analyzed the current door-to-groin time in Germany and explored its effect on functional outcome in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Data were collected in 25 stroke centers in the German Stroke Registry-Endovascular Treatment a prospective, multicenter, observational registry study including stroke patients with large vessel occlusion. Functional outcome was assessed at three months by modified Rankin Scale. Association of door-to-groin time with outcome was calculated using binary logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Out of 4340 patients, 56% were treated primarily in a comprehensive stroke center and 44% in a primary stroke center and then transferred to a comprehensive stroke center ("drip-and-ship" concept). Median onset-to-arrival at comprehensive stroke center time and door-to-groin time were 103 and 79 min in comprehensive stroke center patients and 225 and 44 min in primary stroke center patients. The odds ratio for poor functional outcome per hour of onset-to-arrival-at comprehensive stroke center time was 1.03 (95%CI 1.01-1.05) in comprehensive stroke center patients and 1.06 (95%CI 1.03-1.09) in primary stroke center patients. The odds ratio for poor functional outcome per hour of door-to-groin time was 1.30 (95%CI 1.16-1.46) in comprehensive stroke center patients and 1.04 (95%CI 0.89-1.21) in primary stroke center patients. Longer door-to-groin time in comprehensive stroke center patients was associated with admission on weekends (odds ratio 1.61; 95%CI 1.37-1.97) and during night time (odds ratio 1.52; 95%CI 1.27-1.82) and use of intravenous thrombolysis (odds ratio 1.28; 95%CI 1.08-1.50).

CONCLUSION

Door-to-groin time was especially relevant for outcome of comprehensive stroke center patients, whereas door-to-groin time was much shorter in primary stroke center patients.Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03356392. Unique identifier NCT03356392.

摘要

背景

中风后功能恢复取决于再通时间。直接收入综合卒中中心的患者与通过初级卒中中心转诊的患者的院内延迟的影响可能不同。我们分析了德国目前的门到动脉穿刺时间,并在真实环境中探讨了其对功能结果的影响。

方法

在德国卒中登记-血管内治疗的 25 个卒中中心收集数据,这是一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性登记研究,纳入了大血管闭塞的卒中患者。通过改良Rankin 量表在三个月时评估功能结局。使用二元逻辑回归模型计算门到动脉穿刺时间与结局的相关性。

结果

4340 例患者中,56%在综合卒中中心接受初始治疗,44%在初级卒中中心接受初始治疗后转诊至综合卒中中心(“滴注-转运”概念)。综合卒中中心患者的发病至到达综合卒中中心时间和门到动脉穿刺时间中位数分别为 103 分钟和 79 分钟,初级卒中中心患者分别为 225 分钟和 44 分钟。发病至到达综合卒中中心时间每增加 1 小时,综合卒中中心患者的功能结局不良的优势比为 1.03(95%CI 1.01-1.05),初级卒中中心患者为 1.06(95%CI 1.03-1.09)。门到动脉穿刺时间每增加 1 小时,综合卒中中心患者的功能结局不良的优势比为 1.30(95%CI 1.16-1.46),初级卒中中心患者为 1.04(95%CI 0.89-1.21)。综合卒中中心患者门到动脉穿刺时间较长与周末入院(优势比 1.61;95%CI 1.37-1.97)和夜间入院(优势比 1.52;95%CI 1.27-1.82)以及使用静脉溶栓治疗(优势比 1.28;95%CI 1.08-1.50)相关。

结论

门到动脉穿刺时间对综合卒中中心患者的结局特别重要,而初级卒中中心患者的门到动脉穿刺时间要短得多。

临床试验注册

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03356392。独特标识符 NCT03356392。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验