• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌患者肝转移的风险和预后因素:一项大样本队列研究。

The risk and prognostic factors for liver metastases in esophageal cancer patients: A large-cohort based study.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chuiyangliu Hospital, Chuiyangliu Hospital Affiliated to Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Thorac Cancer. 2022 Nov;13(21):2960-2969. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14642. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1111/1759-7714.14642
PMID:36168908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9626357/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to explore risk factors for liver metastases (LiM) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) and to identify prognostic factors in patients initially diagnosed with LiM.

METHODS

A total of 28 654 EC patients were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2018. A multivariate logistic regression model was utilized to identify risk factors for LiM. A Cox regression model was used to identify prognostic factors for patients with LiM.

RESULTS

Of 28 654 EC patients, 4062 (14.2%) had LiM at diagnosis. The median overall survival (OS) for patients with and without LiM was 6.00 (95% CI: 5.70-6.30) months and 15.00 (95% CI: 14.64-15.36) months, respectively. Variables significantly associated with LiM included gender, age, tumor site, histology, tumor grade, tumor size, clinical T stage, clinical N stage, bone metastases (BoM), brain metastases (BrM) and lung metastases (LuM). Variables independently predicting survival for EC patients with LiM were age, histology, tumor grade, BoM, BrM, LuM, and chemotherapy. A risk prediction model and two survival prediction models were then constructed revealing satisfactory predictive accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the largest known cohort of EC, independent predictors of LiM and prognostic indicators of survival for patients with LiM were identified. Two models for predicting survival as well as a risk prediction model were developed with robust predictive accuracy.

摘要

背景

本回顾性研究旨在探讨食管癌(EC)患者肝转移(LiM)的危险因素,并确定初诊 LiM 患者的预后因素。

方法

从 2010 年至 2018 年,从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中检索了 28654 例 EC 患者。利用多变量逻辑回归模型确定 LiM 的危险因素。利用 Cox 回归模型确定 LiM 患者的预后因素。

结果

在 28654 例 EC 患者中,4062 例(14.2%)在诊断时发生 LiM。有 LiM 和无 LiM 的患者的中位总生存期(OS)分别为 6.00(95%CI:5.70-6.30)个月和 15.00(95%CI:14.64-15.36)个月。与 LiM 显著相关的变量包括性别、年龄、肿瘤部位、组织学、肿瘤分级、肿瘤大小、临床 T 分期、临床 N 分期、骨转移(BoM)、脑转移(BrM)和肺转移(LuM)。独立预测 LiM 患者 EC 生存的变量为年龄、组织学、肿瘤分级、BoM、BrM、LuM 和化疗。然后构建了风险预测模型和两个生存预测模型,均显示出令人满意的预测准确性。

结论

基于已知最大的 EC 队列,确定了 LiM 的独立预测因素和 LiM 患者的生存预后指标。开发了两种具有稳健预测准确性的生存预测模型和一个风险预测模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b504/9626357/b201897ee290/TCA-13-2960-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b504/9626357/98ad07a6ec3a/TCA-13-2960-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b504/9626357/401b813f9f64/TCA-13-2960-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b504/9626357/b201897ee290/TCA-13-2960-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b504/9626357/98ad07a6ec3a/TCA-13-2960-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b504/9626357/401b813f9f64/TCA-13-2960-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b504/9626357/b201897ee290/TCA-13-2960-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The risk and prognostic factors for liver metastases in esophageal cancer patients: A large-cohort based study.食管癌患者肝转移的风险和预后因素:一项大样本队列研究。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Nov;13(21):2960-2969. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14642. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
2
A population-based investigation: How to identify high-risk T1-2N0 esophageal cancer patients?一项基于人群的调查:如何识别高危T1-2N0期食管癌患者?
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 17;9:1003487. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1003487. eCollection 2022.
3
The risk and prognostic factors for brain metastases in esophageal cancer patients: an analysis of the SEER database.食管癌患者脑转移的风险和预后因素:SEER 数据库分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08802-8.
4
Prognostic factors for liver metastasis in patients with small intestinal stromal tumor: A retrospective analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results.患者小肠间质瘤肝转移的预后因素:监测、流行病学和最终结果的回顾性分析。
World J Surg. 2024 Mar;48(3):598-609. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12073. Epub 2024 Jan 23.
5
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict survival outcome among epithelial ovarian cancer patients with site-distant metastases: a population-based study.基于人群的研究:构建并验证用于预测有远处转移的上皮性卵巢癌患者生存结局的列线图。
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 25;21(1):609. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07977-4.
6
Construction and validation of a nomogram for non small cell lung cancer patients with liver metastases based on a population analysis.基于人群分析构建并验证用于非小细胞肺癌伴肝转移患者的列线图。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):4011. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07978-8.
7
Two Novel Nomograms Predicting the Risk and Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer Patients With Lung Metastases: A Population-Based Study.两种预测肺转移胰腺癌患者风险和预后的新型列线图:基于人群的研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 31;10:884349. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.884349. eCollection 2022.
8
Metastasis pattern and prognosis in men with esophageal cancer patients: A SEER-based study.基于 SEER 数据库的研究:食管癌男性患者的转移模式与预后
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jun 25;100(25):e26496. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026496.
9
Prognostic value of site-specific metastases in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database analysis.胰腺腺癌中特定部位转移的预后价值:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 14;23(10):1872-1880. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1872.
10
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict synchronous lung metastases in patients with ovarian cancer: a large cohort study.开发和验证一种列线图模型以预测卵巢癌患者的同步肺转移:一项大样本队列研究。
Biosci Rep. 2020 Nov 27;40(11). doi: 10.1042/BSR20203089.

引用本文的文献

1
Anlotinib combined with benmelstobart as a chemo-free first-line treatment in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: an exploratory multicenter, single-arm phase II clinical trial.安罗替尼联合苯美司他作为晚期食管鳞状细胞癌无化疗一线治疗方案:一项探索性多中心、单臂II期临床试验。
Mol Cancer. 2025 Jun 11;24(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12943-025-02376-w.
2
Use machine learning to predict pulmonary metastasis of esophageal cancer: a population-based study.利用机器学习预测食管癌肺转移:一项基于人群的研究。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Sep 16;150(9):420. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05937-6.
3
The effect of liver metastases on clinical efficacy of first-line programmed death-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A post hoc analysis of ASTRUM-007 and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The risk and prognostic factors for brain metastases in esophageal cancer patients: an analysis of the SEER database.食管癌患者脑转移的风险和预后因素:SEER 数据库分析。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1057. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08802-8.
2
Predicting the risk of interval distant metastases in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing chemoradiotherapy.预测接受放化疗的食管鳞癌患者发生间隔远处转移的风险。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2022 Feb;121(2):539-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.06.002. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
3
Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival of T1 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with lymph node metastasis.
肝转移对一线程序性死亡受体-1 抑制剂联合化疗治疗食管鳞癌临床疗效的影响:ASTRUM-007 的事后分析和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(10):e7203. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7203.
4
Comparing the Efficacy of Carboplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil, and Best Supportive Care for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis from a Tertiary Hospital in Southern Thailand.比较卡铂联合5-氟尿嘧啶、顺铂联合5-氟尿嘧啶及最佳支持治疗对晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效:来自泰国南部一家三级医院的倾向评分分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 17;13(6):1735. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061735.
预测伴有淋巴结转移的T1期食管鳞状细胞癌患者总生存期的列线图的开发与验证
Transl Oncol. 2021 Aug;14(8):101127. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101127. Epub 2021 May 18.
4
Systematic profiling of ferroptosis gene signatures predicts prognostic factors in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.铁死亡基因特征的系统分析预测食管鳞状细胞癌的预后因素。
Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2021 Feb 20;21:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2021.02.011. eCollection 2021 Jun 25.
5
Lung Metastases in Newly Diagnosed Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Study.新诊断食管癌的肺转移:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;11:603953. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.603953. eCollection 2021.
6
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
7
Metastatic pattern in esophageal and gastric cancer: Influenced by site and histology.食管癌和胃癌的转移模式:受部位和组织学影响。
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct 21;26(39):6037-6046. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i39.6037.
8
Infiltration Depth is the Most Relevant Risk Factor for Overall Metastases in Early Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.浸润深度是早期食管腺癌发生总体转移的最相关危险因素。
World J Surg. 2020 Apr;44(4):1192-1199. doi: 10.1007/s00268-019-05291-6.
9
The effect of tumor locations of esophageal cancer on the metastasis to liver or lung.食管癌肿瘤位置对肝或肺转移的影响。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Oct;11(10):4205-4210. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.09.67.
10
Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.食管和胃食管交界处癌,2019 年第 2 版,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jul 1;17(7):855-883. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033.