Douglas Karen M, Sutton Robbie M
School of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom; email:
Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:271-298. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-032420-031329. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
Conspiracy theories are abundant in social and political discourse, with serious consequences for individuals, groups, and societies. However, psychological scientists have started paying close attention to them only in the past 20 years. We review the spectacular progress that has since been made and some of the limitations of research so far, and we consider the prospects for further progress. To this end, we take a step back to analyze the defining features that make conspiracy theories different in kind from other beliefs and different in degree from each other. We consider how these features determine the adoption, consequences, and transmission of belief in conspiracy theories, even though their role as causal or moderating variables has seldom been examined. We therefore advocate for a research agenda in the study of conspiracy theories that starts-as is routine in fields such as virology and toxicology-with a robust descriptive analysis of the ontology of the entity at its center.
阴谋论在社会和政治话语中比比皆是,对个人、群体和社会都产生了严重影响。然而,直到过去20年,心理学家才开始密切关注它们。我们回顾了此后取得的显著进展以及目前研究的一些局限性,并探讨了进一步取得进展的前景。为此,我们退一步分析阴谋论与其他信念在本质上不同以及彼此之间在程度上不同的决定性特征。我们思考这些特征如何决定对阴谋论信念的接受、影响及传播,尽管它们作为因果或调节变量的作用很少被研究。因此,我们倡导在阴谋论研究中制定一个研究议程,该议程如同病毒学和毒理学等领域的常规做法一样,从对处于核心地位的实体本体进行有力的描述性分析开始。