Alzahrani Wael M
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, SAU.
Cureus. 2022 Aug 25;14(8):e28378. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28378. eCollection 2022 Aug.
To synthesize the available information on the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections against surgery as therapy strategies for medial epicondylitis (ME). We searched the Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases with the relevant keywords to identify the studies comparing the efficiency of PRP injections and ME surgery. We excluded non-English articles, case reports, and conference abstracts. Only two studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. No conflicts were reported between both studies. Both studies were carried out in the United States of America. The outcomes of PRP and surgical interventions were similar, with no reported statistical differences. Both studies recorded an excellent outcome following the PRP and surgical interventions, where the patients returned to full movement with no pain. The current evidence shows that PRP injections are just as effective as ME surgery in relieving pain and restoring function for those with ME, especially in the short and mid-term. Therefore, the injection of PRP is a promising treatment option for ME.
综合关于富血小板血浆(PRP)注射与手术作为治疗肱骨内上髁炎(ME)的治疗策略有效性的现有信息。我们使用相关关键词检索了Embase、MEDLINE和Cochrane图书馆数据库,以识别比较PRP注射与ME手术效率的研究。我们排除了非英文文章、病例报告和会议摘要。只有两项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入定性综合分析。两项研究均未报告冲突。两项研究均在美国进行。PRP和手术干预的结果相似,未报告统计学差异。两项研究均记录了PRP和手术干预后的良好结果,患者恢复了完全活动且无疼痛。目前的证据表明,PRP注射在缓解ME患者疼痛和恢复功能方面与ME手术同样有效,尤其是在短期和中期。因此,PRP注射是ME一种有前景的治疗选择。