Kemp Jordyn A, Olson Megan A, Tao Matthew A, Burcal Christopher J
University of Nebraska at Omaha.
University of Nebraska Medical Center.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;16(3):597-605. doi: 10.26603/001c.24148.
Lateral epicondylitis (LE) is one of the most commonly reported musculoskeletal disorders in the upper extremity. The mechanism of LE is repetitive motion that causes a strain of the extensor tendons. This consequently causes pain and tendinosis at the tendinous attachment site on the lateral epicondyle. Most cases of LE are treated nonoperatively with a variety of interventions, such as injections.
The aim of this systematic review (SR) is to synthesize the current evidence on the efficacy of platelet rich plasma (PRP) injections versus corticosteroid (CS) injections as treatment interventions for LE.
Systematic Review.
Online databases were searched from database inception to February 24th, 2020 for relevant SR's evaluating PRP vs. CS injections as treatment methods for LE. Two independent researchers searched and screened for articles that were systematic reviews that directly compared PRP to CS injections for LE.
A total of five SR's were included in this review that were published between 2016 and 2020. CS injections were more efficacious for short-term pain relief, and PRP injections were more efficacious for long-term pain relief and improved function.
PRP injections appear to be a more effective long-term treatment option than CS injections for those with LE who did not respond to conservative management.
外侧肱骨髁炎(LE)是上肢最常报告的肌肉骨骼疾病之一。LE的发病机制是重复性运动导致伸肌腱劳损。这进而导致外侧髁上肌腱附着部位疼痛和肌腱病。大多数LE病例采用多种干预措施进行非手术治疗,如注射治疗。
本系统评价(SR)的目的是综合目前关于富血小板血浆(PRP)注射与皮质类固醇(CS)注射作为LE治疗干预措施疗效的证据。
系统评价。
从数据库建立至2020年2月24日检索在线数据库,以查找评估PRP与CS注射作为LE治疗方法的相关SR。两名独立研究人员检索并筛选直接比较PRP与CS注射治疗LE的系统评价文章。
本评价共纳入2016年至2020年间发表的5篇SR。CS注射在短期疼痛缓解方面更有效,而PRP注射在长期疼痛缓解和功能改善方面更有效。
对于保守治疗无效的LE患者,PRP注射似乎是比CS注射更有效的长期治疗选择。
1级。