Suppr超能文献

自尊、羞耻和自我批评的自我报告测量之间的判别效度低:对自我评价测量和负面自我评价量表创建的影响。

Low levels of discriminant validity between self-report measures of self-esteem, shame, and self-criticism: Implications for the measurement of self-evaluation and creation of the Negative Self-Evaluation Scale.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

Department of Human Development and Quantitative Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Assess. 2022 Oct;34(10):923-936. doi: 10.1037/pas0001156.

Abstract

This article examined the discriminant and convergent validity of commonly used self-report measures of self-criticism, self-esteem, and shame. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using multiple self-report measures of each construct showed low levels of discriminant validity between self-reported self-esteem, shame, and self-criticism and instead demonstrated correspondingly high levels of shared variance. However, bifactor analyses on the items across each measure suggested that self-report measures of self-esteem, shame, and self-criticism may contain distinct characteristics that are underrepresented in current measures of each construct. Based on the factor loadings in item-level bifactor analyses, a new measure, the Negative Self-Evaluation Scale (NSES), was constructed to improve the assessment of the unique characteristics of shame, self-esteem, and self-criticism. Implications for current and future practices concerning the measurement of each construct are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

这篇文章考察了常用的自我报告的自我批评、自尊和羞耻感的度量标准的判别和收敛有效性。使用每个结构的多个自我报告度量的验证性因子分析 (CFA) 显示,自我报告的自尊、羞耻和自我批评之间的判别有效性较低,而表现出相应的高共享方差。然而,对每个度量的项目进行双因素分析表明,自尊、羞耻和自我批评的自我报告度量可能包含当前每个结构度量中代表性不足的独特特征。基于项目水平双因素分析中的因子负荷,构建了一个新的度量标准,即负面自我评估量表 (NSES),以改善对羞耻、自尊和自我批评的独特特征的评估。讨论了对每个结构的当前和未来实践的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验