Gowd Anirudh K, O'Neill Conor N, Barghi Ameen, O'Gara Tadhg J, Carmouche Jonathan J
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:e223-e232. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.090. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
Increased emphasis is being placed on efficiency and resource utilization when performing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and accurate prediction of complications is increasingly important to optimize care. This study aimed to compare predictive models for postoperative complications following ACDF using machine learning (ML) models based on traditional comorbidity indices.
In this retrospective case series, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried between 2011 and 2017 for all elective, primary ACDF cases. Levels of surgery, use of interbody implants, and graft selection were calculated by procedural codes. Six ML algorithms were constructed using available preoperative and intraoperative features. The overall dataset was randomly split into training (80%) and validation (20%) subsets wherein the training subset optimized the model, and the validation subset was evaluated for accuracy. ML models were compared with models constructed from American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and frailty index alone.
There were 42,194 ACDF cases eligible for inclusion. Mean age was 47.7 ± 11.6 years, body mass index was 30.4 ± 6.7, and levels of operation were 1.6 ± 0.7. ML algorithms uniformly outperformed comorbidity indices in predicting complications. Logistic regression ML algorithm was the best performing for predicting any adverse event (area under the curve [AUC] 0.73), transfusion (AUC 0.90), surgical site infection (AUC 0.63), and pneumonia (AUC 0.80). Gradient boosting trees ML algorithm was the best performing for predicting extended length of stay (AUC 0.73).
ML algorithms modeled the development of postoperative adverse events with superior accuracy to that of comorbidity indices and may guide preoperative clinical decision making before ACDF.
在进行颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)时,人们越来越重视效率和资源利用,准确预测并发症对于优化治疗愈发重要。本研究旨在比较基于传统合并症指数的机器学习(ML)模型对ACDF术后并发症的预测模型。
在这个回顾性病例系列中,查询了美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库在2011年至2017年间的所有择期、原发性ACDF病例。手术节段、椎间融合器的使用和植骨选择通过手术编码计算。使用可用的术前和术中特征构建了六种ML算法。将整个数据集随机分为训练子集(80%)和验证子集(20%),其中训练子集用于优化模型,验证子集用于评估准确性。将ML模型与仅由美国麻醉医师协会分类和衰弱指数构建的模型进行比较。
有42194例ACDF病例符合纳入标准。平均年龄为47.7±—11.6岁,体重指数为30.4±6.7,手术节段为1.6±0.7。在预测并发症方面,ML算法普遍优于合并症指数。逻辑回归ML算法在预测任何不良事件(曲线下面积[AUC]为0.73)、输血(AUC为0.90)、手术部位感染(AUC为0.63)和肺炎(AUC为0.80)方面表现最佳。梯度提升树ML算法在预测延长住院时间(AUC为0.73)方面表现最佳。
ML算法对术后不良事件发生情况的建模准确性优于合并症指数,可能会在ACDF术前指导临床决策。