• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对急诊科多元化、公平性和包容性氛围的看法。

Patient perspectives of the climate of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the emergency department.

作者信息

Davuluri Kavya, Goyal Nikhil, Gomez Acevedo Harold, Folt Jason, Jayaprakash Namita, Slezak Michelle, Caldwell Martina T

机构信息

University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine Henry Ford Health System Detroit Michigan USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Sep 17;3(5):e12798. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12798. eCollection 2022 Oct.

DOI:10.1002/emp2.12798
PMID:36176501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9482342/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Assessing the diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) climate of emergency departments (EDs) can inform organizational change to provide equitable, inclusive, and high-quality care to their diverse patient populations. The purpose of this project was to investigate patient perspectives on the climate of DEI in an urban ED.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional survey study conducted in a large-volume, urban ED in Detroit, MI, from November 2018 to January 2019. The survey was developed by an experienced ED DEI committee via an iterative process and broad consensus.

RESULTS

During their care in the ED, 849 patients completed an anonymous survey about their perspectives and experiences of DEI in that ED. Overall, the responses were favorable as most respondents reported that the ED staff treated patients from all races equally (75.8%) and made patients feel accepted (86%). However, some respondents felt that the ED staff's treatment of populations with greater complexity, such as patients who are mentally ill (16.8%) or lower income (14.3%), needs the most improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This DEI climate assessment survey of ED patients' perspectives revealed important insights that could guide strategic initiatives to advance DEI in the ED. This assessment may serve as a model for continuous evaluation of DEI over time and in multiple healthcare settings to help guide organizational change efforts.

摘要

目的

评估急诊科的多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)氛围,可为组织变革提供信息,以便为其多样化的患者群体提供公平、包容和高质量的护理。本项目的目的是调查患者对城市急诊科DEI氛围的看法。

方法

这是一项横断面调查研究,于2018年11月至2019年1月在密歇根州底特律市一家大型城市急诊科进行。该调查由一个经验丰富的急诊科DEI委员会通过迭代过程和广泛共识制定。

结果

在急诊科接受治疗期间,849名患者完成了一项关于他们对该急诊科DEI的看法和经历的匿名调查。总体而言,回应是积极的,因为大多数受访者表示急诊科工作人员平等对待所有种族的患者(75.8%),并让患者感到被接纳(86%)。然而,一些受访者认为急诊科工作人员对病情更复杂的人群,如精神疾病患者(16.8%)或低收入患者(14.3%)的治疗最需要改进。

结论

这项关于急诊科患者看法的DEI氛围评估调查揭示了重要的见解,可指导推进急诊科DEI的战略举措。该评估可作为随着时间推移在多个医疗环境中持续评估DEI的模型,以帮助指导组织变革努力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/9482342/17fdc17affa4/EMP2-3-e12798-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/9482342/17fdc17affa4/EMP2-3-e12798-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/9482342/17fdc17affa4/EMP2-3-e12798-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient perspectives of the climate of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the emergency department.患者对急诊科多元化、公平性和包容性氛围的看法。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Sep 17;3(5):e12798. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12798. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
The Current State of Departmental Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts Within US Academic Radiation Oncology Departments.美国学术放射肿瘤学系部门多样性、公平性和包容性工作的现状。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Jun 1;116(2):219-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.071. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
3
Programmatic engagement in diversity, equity, and inclusion in U.S. vascular surgery training programs.美国血管外科培训项目中在多样性、公平性和包容性方面的规划性参与。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Mar;77(3):930-938. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.10.051. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
4
Emergency department care experiences among members of equity-deserving groups: quantitative results from a cross-sectional mixed methods study.公平权益群体成员在急诊部门的就医体验:一项横断面混合方法研究的定量结果。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 21;23(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00792-z.
5
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Endocrinology: A Survey and Vision for the Future.内分泌学中的多样性、公平性和包容性:调查与未来展望。
Endocr Pract. 2022 Aug;28(8):737-743. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
6
Identifying the prevalence and characteristics of diversity, equity, and inclusion leaders in academic emergency medicine.确定学术急诊医学中多元化、公平性和包容性领导者的患病率及特征。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Mar 21;8(2):e10965. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10965. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
Review of Best Practices for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committees Within Colleges of Pharmacy.药学学院多样性、公平性和包容性委员会最佳实践回顾。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(4):ajpe9043. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9043. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
8
Faculty Perspectives on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Building a Foundation for Pediatrics.教师对多样性、公平性和包容性的看法:为儿科学奠定基础。
Pediatrics. 2023 Apr 1;151(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-058394.
9
Diversity, equity, and inclusion within the Society for Pediatric Anesthesia: A mixed methods assessment.儿科麻醉学会中的多样性、公平性和包容性:混合方法评估。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2023 Jun;33(6):435-445. doi: 10.1111/pan.14642. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
10
Understanding faculty perceptions and experiences related to climate, diversity, equity, and inclusion at a college of pharmacy: A pilot study.了解药学院教师对气候、多样性、公平和包容的看法和经验:一项试点研究。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2024 Jan;16(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.12.002. Epub 2023 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining the Emergency Department Care Experiences of Equity-Deserving Groups Using an Intersectional Lens.用交叉视角审视有公平权益需求群体的急诊护理体验。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241290888. doi: 10.1177/21501319241290888.
2
Identifying the prevalence and characteristics of diversity, equity, and inclusion leaders in academic emergency medicine.确定学术急诊医学中多元化、公平性和包容性领导者的患病率及特征。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Mar 21;8(2):e10965. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10965. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Invited Editorial: Patient perspectives of the climate of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the emergency department.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes, Behavior, and Comfort of Emergency Medicine Residents in Caring for LGBT Patients: What Do We Know?急诊医学住院医师在照料 LGBT 患者时的态度、行为与舒适度:我们了解些什么?
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Jan 21;3(2):129-135. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10318. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Understanding organisational culture for healthcare quality improvement.理解组织文化以提升医疗质量。
BMJ. 2018 Nov 28;363:k4907. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4907.
3
Effective diversity, equity, and inclusion practices.有效的多元化、公平性和包容性实践。
特邀社论:患者对急诊科多样性、公平性和包容性氛围的看法。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Sep 17;3(5):e12805. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12805. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Healthc Manage Forum. 2018 Sep;31(5):196-199. doi: 10.1177/0840470418773785. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
4
Lies, Damned Lies, and Surveys.谎言、该死的谎言与调查。
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Dec;9(6):677-679. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00698.1.
5
How to Create a Bad Survey Instrument.如何设计一份糟糕的调查问卷。
J Grad Med Educ. 2017 Aug;9(4):411-415. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00375.1.
6
Exploring the Value Proposition of Primary Care for Safety-Net Patients Who Utilize Emergency Departments to Address Unmet Needs.探索初级保健对利用急诊科来满足未满足需求的安全网患者的价值主张。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2017 Oct;8(4):285-293. doi: 10.1177/2150131917721652. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
7
Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.医疗保健专业人员中的隐性偏见:一项系统综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Mar 1;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0179-8.
8
Why Diversity and Inclusion Are Critical to the American College of Emergency Physicians' Future Success.为何多元化与包容性对美国急诊医师学会未来的成功至关重要。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;69(6):714-717. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.030. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
9
Executive Leadership and Physician Well-being: Nine Organizational Strategies to Promote Engagement and Reduce Burnout.行政领导与医生福祉:促进参与度和减少职业倦怠的九种组织策略。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Jan;92(1):129-146. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
10
What Cognitive Psychology Tells Us About Emergency Department Physician Decision-making and How to Improve It.认知心理学关于急诊科医生决策的启示以及如何改进决策
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;24(1):117-119. doi: 10.1111/acem.13110.