• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将“用药理由”纳入药物处方流程:比利时佛兰德斯地区患者意见调查。

Incorporating 'reason for use' into the prescribing process of medication: a survey on the opinion of patients in Flanders, Belgium.

机构信息

University of Antwerp, Toxicological Centre, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610, Antwerp, Belgium.

Department of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-cosmetology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090, Jette, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 30;22(1):1216. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08596-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-022-08596-w
PMID:36180847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9523178/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A longstanding debate exists about including a 'reason for use' on prescriptions for medication. Little is known, however, about patients' opinions on this subject.

METHODS

An internet-based questionnaire, consisting mainly of Likert scale questions, was distributed online to the general public in Belgium. Results from 1034 responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Opinions from patients toward including a 'reason for use' on medication prescriptions were generally positive. A clear majority of 62% increased to 74% after providing information about the possible link between indication and medication dose. A majority of the participants expressed a positive attitude regardless of the pathology involved, although sexually transmitted diseases were of greatest concern. Other important aspects differentiating the opinion positively was the transmission of this information in an electronic-only form and limiting it to the regular pharmacist excluding further use by third parties such as other pharmacies or insurance companies. Patients using multiple medicines and those frequenting the same pharmacy also had a more favorable opinion about including the reason for use. In addition, analysis of physician and pharmacist questionnaire responses, explicitly excluded from the main analysis, confirmed the known contrasting opinions in these subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients have strong support for transferring information on the 'reason for use' of their prescriptions to their regular pharmacy if this is done in a secure and privacy-conscious way enabling increased patient safety and improved pharmaceutical care.

摘要

背景

长期以来,关于在药物处方上注明“用药理由”一直存在争议。然而,人们对此知之甚少。

方法

主要由李克特量表问题组成的基于互联网的问卷在比利时向公众在线分发。使用描述性统计方法分析了来自 1034 个回复的结果。

结果

患者对在药物处方上注明“用药理由”的意见普遍较为积极。在提供了关于指示与药物剂量之间可能存在联系的信息后,这一比例从 62%增加到了 74%。大多数参与者无论涉及何种疾病,都持积极态度,尽管性传播疾病最为令人关注。其他重要的区别因素是,以电子形式传递这些信息并将其限制在常规药剂师范围内,排除了其他第三方(如其他药店或保险公司)的进一步使用。同时,使用多种药物和经常光顾同一家药店的患者对注明用药理由的意见也更为积极。此外,对医生和药剂师问卷回复的分析(明确排除在主要分析之外)证实了这些亚组中已知的相反意见。

结论

如果以安全和注重隐私的方式将处方的“用药理由”信息转交给患者的常规药房,患者会强烈支持,这将提高患者安全性并改善药物治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d5/9524067/f6368df13d78/12913_2022_8596_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d5/9524067/dd1978d54748/12913_2022_8596_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d5/9524067/06f21138568d/12913_2022_8596_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d5/9524067/f49656bd5dce/12913_2022_8596_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d5/9524067/f6368df13d78/12913_2022_8596_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d5/9524067/dd1978d54748/12913_2022_8596_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d5/9524067/06f21138568d/12913_2022_8596_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d5/9524067/f49656bd5dce/12913_2022_8596_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45d5/9524067/f6368df13d78/12913_2022_8596_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Incorporating 'reason for use' into the prescribing process of medication: a survey on the opinion of patients in Flanders, Belgium.将“用药理由”纳入药物处方流程:比利时佛兰德斯地区患者意见调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 30;22(1):1216. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08596-w.
2
[Opinions and attitudes of Flemish pharmacists and general practitioners towards INN prescribing. A survery in Antwerp and East Flanders].[弗拉芒药剂师和全科医生对国际非专利药品名称(INN)处方的意见和态度。在安特卫普和东佛兰德省的一项调查]
J Pharm Belg. 2013 Jun(2):18-31.
3
On-the-ground application of the 'temporary recommendation for use' regulatory measure on off-label use of baclofen for alcohol dependence in France: a regional survey of community pharmacies.法国对巴氯芬用于酒精依赖的标签外使用实施“临时使用建议”监管措施的实地应用:社区药房的区域调查
Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr;32(2):234-238. doi: 10.1111/fcp.12332. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
4
Patient experiences of over-the-counter medicine purchases in Flemish community pharmacies.弗拉芒社区药房非处方药购买的患者体验。
Pharm World Sci. 2009 Aug;31(4):450-457. doi: 10.1007/s11096-009-9293-0. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
5
The effectiveness of a 'Do Not Use' list and perceptions of healthcare professionals on error-prone abbreviations.“请勿使用”清单的有效性及医疗保健专业人员对易出错缩写词的看法。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Oct;36(5):1000-6. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-9987-9. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
6
Community pharmacy practice in Japan--results of a survey.日本社区药房实践——一项调查结果
J Clin Pharm Ther. 1998 Jun;23(3):223-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2710.1998.00155.x.
7
Why do Belgian Community Pharmacists Still Treat Electronic Prescriptions as Paper-Based?为什么比利时社区药剂师仍将电子处方视为纸质处方?
J Med Syst. 2019 Oct 23;43(11):327. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1456-5.
8
Pharmaceutical counseling: Between evidence-based medicine and profits.药学咨询:在循证医学与利润之间
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S87-8. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150701.
9
Evaluation of the quality of 'do not use' medication abbreviation audits: a key enabler to successful implementation of audit and feedback.评估“不要使用”药物缩写医嘱审核的质量:成功实施审核和反馈的关键促成因素。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2021 Jun;43(3):748-752. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01232-3. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
10
What do Australian consumers, pharmacists and prescribers think about documenting indications on prescriptions and dispensed medicines labels?: A qualitative study.澳大利亚消费者、药剂师和开处方者对在处方和配药标签上记录适应症有何看法?一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):734. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2704-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting vaccine uptake during COVID-19 crisis: A motivational approach.预测 COVID-19 危机期间的疫苗接种率:一种动机方法。
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 21;40(2):288-297. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.068. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
2
Including the Reason for Use on Prescriptions Sent to Pharmacists: Scoping Review.包括发送给药剂师的处方上的使用原因:范围综述。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Nov 25;8(4):e22325. doi: 10.2196/22325.
3
A cross-sectional survey to map Clinical Pharmacy Education and Practice in Europe.一项针对欧洲临床药学教育和实践的横断面调查。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Feb;44(1):118-126. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01321-3. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
4
Drug-Related Problems of Patients in Primary Health Care Institutions: A Systematic Review.基层医疗卫生机构患者的药物相关问题:一项系统综述
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Aug 17;12:698907. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.698907. eCollection 2021.
5
Can COVID-19 symptoms as reported in a large-scale online survey be used to optimise spatial predictions of COVID-19 incidence risk in Belgium?在一项大规模在线调查中报告的新冠病毒病症状能否用于优化比利时新冠病毒病发病风险的空间预测?
Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;35:100379. doi: 10.1016/j.sste.2020.100379. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
6
Medication management surrounding transitions of care: A qualitative assessment of community pharmacists' preferences (MEMO TOC).护理过渡期间的药物管理:社区药剂师偏好的定性评估(备忘录目录)
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2020 Aug 27;153(5):301-307. doi: 10.1177/1715163520947444. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
7
Pharmacists' perspectives on the value of reason for use information.药剂师对用药理由信息价值的看法。
Can Pharm J (Ott). 2020 Aug 18;153(5):294-300. doi: 10.1177/1715163520946052. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
8
How do I keep myself safe? Patient perspectives on including reason for use information on prescriptions and medication labels: a qualitative thematic analysis.我如何保护自己的安全?患者对在处方和药品标签上包含用药原因信息的看法:一项定性主题分析。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2020 Oct 7;13:63. doi: 10.1186/s40545-020-00268-6. eCollection 2020.
9
Going web or staying paper? The use of web-surveys among older people.上网还是用纸?老年人对网络调查的使用情况。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01138-0.
10
2019 John M. Eisenberg Patient Safety and Quality Awards: An Interview with Gordon D. Schiff.2019年约翰·M·艾森伯格患者安全与质量奖:对戈登·D·希夫的访谈
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Jul;46(7):371-380. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.04.008. Epub 2020 Apr 29.