Suppr超能文献

一项关于美国 COVID-19 披露污名和 COVID-19 检测犹豫的纵向研究。

A longitudinal study of COVID-19 disclosure stigma and COVID-19 testing hesitancy in the United States.

机构信息

Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.

Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, USA.

出版信息

Public Health. 2022 Nov;212:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study examines the relationship between COVID-19 disclosure stigma and COVID-19 testing hesitancy and assesses their changes between November 2020 and 2021.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a longitudinal cohort.

METHODS

A total of 355 participants completed four study waves between November 2020 and November 2021. Factor analyses and Cronbach's alpha assessed the factor structure and internal consistency of the COVID-19 Disclosure Stigma scale. Paired t-tests and McNemar's Chi-squared test assessed change between the study waves. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the relationship between COVID-19 disclosure stigma and testing hesitancy at four study waves.

RESULTS

COVID-19 disclosure stigma declined significantly between the last study waves (P = 0.030). The greatest disclosure concern was reporting a positive test to close contacts (range: 19%-21%) followed by disclosure to friends (range: 10%-15%) and family (range: 4%-10%). Over the course of the four study waves, COVID-19 testing hesitancy when symptomatic ranged from 23% to 30%. Older age, female gender, and having received a COVID-19 vaccine were associated with decreased odds of testing hesitancy. Greater COVID-19 disclosure stigma and more conservative political ideology showed a consistent relationship with increased odds of COVID-19 testing hesitancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings suggest that many people anticipate feeling stigmatized when disclosing positive test results, especially to close contacts. A substantial percentage of study participants reported hesitancy to be tested when symptomatic. This study identifies a need for interventions that normalize COVID-19 testing (e.g. engaging leaders with conservative followings), provide strategies for disclosing positive results, and allow anonymous notification of potential COVID-19 exposure.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨 COVID-19 披露耻辱感与 COVID-19 检测犹豫之间的关系,并评估它们在 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年间的变化。

研究设计

这是一项纵向队列研究。

方法

共有 355 名参与者在 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 11 月期间完成了四个研究波次。因子分析和 Cronbach's alpha 用于评估 COVID-19 披露耻辱感量表的因子结构和内部一致性。配对 t 检验和 McNemar 的卡方检验用于评估研究波次之间的变化。多变量逻辑回归模型用于在四个研究波次中研究 COVID-19 披露耻辱感与检测犹豫之间的关系。

结果

COVID-19 披露耻辱感在最后两个研究波次之间显著下降(P=0.030)。报告阳性检测结果给密切接触者是最令人担忧的披露问题(范围:19%-21%),其次是给朋友(范围:10%-15%)和家人(范围:4%-10%)。在四个研究波次中,有症状时进行 COVID-19 检测的犹豫程度在 23%至 30%之间。年龄较大、女性和接种 COVID-19 疫苗与检测犹豫的可能性降低有关。更大的 COVID-19 披露耻辱感和更保守的政治意识形态与 COVID-19 检测犹豫的可能性增加呈一致关系。

结论

研究结果表明,许多人在披露阳性检测结果时预计会感到耻辱,尤其是对密切接触者。相当一部分研究参与者在有症状时报告了检测犹豫。本研究确定了需要干预措施来使 COVID-19 检测正常化(例如,让保守派追随者中的领导参与),提供披露阳性结果的策略,并允许对潜在 COVID-19 暴露进行匿名通知。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f66/9411141/5afe69480ee0/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验