Department of Health Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.
Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, USA.
Public Health. 2022 Nov;212:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.08.003. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
This study examines the relationship between COVID-19 disclosure stigma and COVID-19 testing hesitancy and assesses their changes between November 2020 and 2021.
This was a longitudinal cohort.
A total of 355 participants completed four study waves between November 2020 and November 2021. Factor analyses and Cronbach's alpha assessed the factor structure and internal consistency of the COVID-19 Disclosure Stigma scale. Paired t-tests and McNemar's Chi-squared test assessed change between the study waves. Multivariable logistic regression models examined the relationship between COVID-19 disclosure stigma and testing hesitancy at four study waves.
COVID-19 disclosure stigma declined significantly between the last study waves (P = 0.030). The greatest disclosure concern was reporting a positive test to close contacts (range: 19%-21%) followed by disclosure to friends (range: 10%-15%) and family (range: 4%-10%). Over the course of the four study waves, COVID-19 testing hesitancy when symptomatic ranged from 23% to 30%. Older age, female gender, and having received a COVID-19 vaccine were associated with decreased odds of testing hesitancy. Greater COVID-19 disclosure stigma and more conservative political ideology showed a consistent relationship with increased odds of COVID-19 testing hesitancy.
Study findings suggest that many people anticipate feeling stigmatized when disclosing positive test results, especially to close contacts. A substantial percentage of study participants reported hesitancy to be tested when symptomatic. This study identifies a need for interventions that normalize COVID-19 testing (e.g. engaging leaders with conservative followings), provide strategies for disclosing positive results, and allow anonymous notification of potential COVID-19 exposure.
本研究旨在探讨 COVID-19 披露耻辱感与 COVID-19 检测犹豫之间的关系,并评估它们在 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年间的变化。
这是一项纵向队列研究。
共有 355 名参与者在 2020 年 11 月至 2021 年 11 月期间完成了四个研究波次。因子分析和 Cronbach's alpha 用于评估 COVID-19 披露耻辱感量表的因子结构和内部一致性。配对 t 检验和 McNemar 的卡方检验用于评估研究波次之间的变化。多变量逻辑回归模型用于在四个研究波次中研究 COVID-19 披露耻辱感与检测犹豫之间的关系。
COVID-19 披露耻辱感在最后两个研究波次之间显著下降(P=0.030)。报告阳性检测结果给密切接触者是最令人担忧的披露问题(范围:19%-21%),其次是给朋友(范围:10%-15%)和家人(范围:4%-10%)。在四个研究波次中,有症状时进行 COVID-19 检测的犹豫程度在 23%至 30%之间。年龄较大、女性和接种 COVID-19 疫苗与检测犹豫的可能性降低有关。更大的 COVID-19 披露耻辱感和更保守的政治意识形态与 COVID-19 检测犹豫的可能性增加呈一致关系。
研究结果表明,许多人在披露阳性检测结果时预计会感到耻辱,尤其是对密切接触者。相当一部分研究参与者在有症状时报告了检测犹豫。本研究确定了需要干预措施来使 COVID-19 检测正常化(例如,让保守派追随者中的领导参与),提供披露阳性结果的策略,并允许对潜在 COVID-19 暴露进行匿名通知。