• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善从医院到家庭过渡的安全性和体验:一项“您的护理需要您”干预措施与常规护理的整群随机对照可行性试验。

Improving the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial of the 'Your Care Needs You' intervention versus usual care.

作者信息

Baxter Ruth, Murray Jenni, Cockayne Sarah, Baird Kalpita, Mandefield Laura, Mills Thomas, Lawton Rebecca, Hewitt Catherine, Richardson Gerry, Sheard Laura, O'Hara Jane K

机构信息

Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Oct 1;8(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01180-3.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-022-01180-3
PMID:36183129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9525931/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 'Your Care Needs You' (YCNY) intervention aims to increase the safety and experience of transitions for older people through greater patient involvement during the hospital stay.

METHODS

A cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial was conducted on NHS inpatient wards (clusters) where ≥ 40% of patients were routinely ≥ 75 years. Wards were randomised to YCNY or usual care using an unequal allocation ratio (3:2). We aimed to recruit up to 20 patients per ward. Follow-up included routine data collection and questionnaires at 5-, 30-, and 90-days post-discharge. Eligible patients were ≥ 75 years, discharged home, stayed overnight on participating wards, and could read and understand English. The trial assessed the feasibility of delivering YCNY and the trial methodology through recruitment rates, outcome completion rates, and a qualitative evaluation. The accuracy of using routinely coded data for the primary outcome in the definitive trial was assessed by extracting discharge information for up to ten nonindividual consenting patients per ward.

RESULTS

Ten wards were randomised (6 intervention, 4 control). One ward withdrew, and two wards were unable to deliver the intervention. Seven-hundred twenty-one patients were successfully screened, and 161 were recruited (95 intervention, 66 control). The patient post-discharge attrition rate was 17.4% (n = 28). Primary outcome data were gathered for 91.9% of participants with 75.2% and 59.0% providing secondary outcome data at 5 and 30 days post-discharge respectively. Item completion within questionnaires was generally high. Post-discharge follow-up was terminated early due to the COVID-19 pandemic affecting 90-day response rates (16.8%). Data from 88 nonindividual consenting patients identified an error rate of 15% when using routinely coded data for the primary outcome. No unexpected serious adverse events were identified. Most patients viewed YCNY favourably. Staff agreed with it in principle, but ward pressures and organisational contexts hampered implementation. There was a need to sustain engagement, provide clarity on roles and responsibilities, and account for fluctuations in patients' health, capacity, and preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

If implementation challenges can be overcome, YCNY represents a step towards involving older people as partners in their care to improve the safety and experience of their transitions from hospital to home.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN: 51154948.

摘要

背景

“你的护理需要你”(YCNY)干预措施旨在通过在住院期间让患者更多地参与,提高老年人转院的安全性和体验。

方法

在国民保健服务(NHS)的住院病房(群组)中进行了一项群组随机对照可行性试验,这些病房中≥40%的患者通常年龄≥75岁。病房以不等的分配比例(3:2)随机分为YCNY组或常规护理组。我们的目标是每个病房招募多达20名患者。随访包括出院后5天、30天和90天的常规数据收集和问卷调查。符合条件的患者年龄≥75岁,出院回家,在参与试验的病房过夜,并且能够阅读和理解英语。该试验通过招募率、结果完成率和定性评估,评估了实施YCNY和试验方法的可行性。通过提取每个病房多达十名未签署个人同意书患者的出院信息,评估在确定性试验中使用常规编码数据作为主要结局的准确性。

结果

十个病房被随机分组(6个干预组,4个对照组)。一个病房退出,两个病房无法实施干预措施。成功筛查了721名患者,招募了161名(95名干预组,66名对照组)。患者出院后的失访率为17.4%(n = 28)。91.9%的参与者收集到了主要结局数据,分别有75.2%和59.0%的参与者在出院后5天和30天提供了次要结局数据。问卷中的项目完成率总体较高。由于新冠疫情影响了90天的回复率(16.8%),出院后随访提前终止。从88名未签署个人同意书的患者数据中发现,使用常规编码数据作为主要结局时错误率为15%。未发现意外的严重不良事件。大多数患者对YCNY持积极态度。工作人员原则上表示认同,但病房压力和组织环境阻碍了实施。需要持续保持参与度,明确角色和职责,并考虑患者健康、能力和偏好的波动情况。

结论

如果能够克服实施挑战,YCNY代表着朝着让老年人成为其护理伙伴迈出的一步,以改善他们从医院到家的转院安全性和体验。

试验注册

国际标准随机对照试验编号:51154948。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/309c/9526299/2a241fccd7f4/40814_2022_1180_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/309c/9526299/2a241fccd7f4/40814_2022_1180_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/309c/9526299/2a241fccd7f4/40814_2022_1180_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial of the 'Your Care Needs You' intervention versus usual care.改善从医院到家庭过渡的安全性和体验:一项“您的护理需要您”干预措施与常规护理的整群随机对照可行性试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Oct 1;8(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01180-3.
2
Improving patient experience and safety at transitions of care through the Your Care Needs You (YCNY) intervention: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.通过“您的护理需要您”(YCNY)干预改善护理转接过程中的患者体验和安全:一项整群随机对照可行性试验的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 2;6:123. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00655-5. eCollection 2020.
3
Evaluating an intervention to improve the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home for older people (Your Care Needs You): a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation.评价一项干预措施,以改善老年人从医院到家庭过渡的安全性和体验(Your Care Needs You):一项集群随机对照试验和过程评估的方案。
Trials. 2023 Oct 14;24(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07716-z.
4
5
Understanding the challenges and successes of implementing 'hybrid' interventions in healthcare settings: findings from a process evaluation of a patient involvement trial.了解在医疗环境中实施“混合”干预措施的挑战与成功之处:一项患者参与试验的过程评估结果
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jan 28;34(2):92-99. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017268.
6
7
A non-randomised feasibility study of an intervention to optimise medicines at transitions of care for patients with heart failure.一项针对心力衰竭患者在护理转接过程中优化药物治疗的干预措施的非随机可行性研究。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Mar 26;7(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00819-x.
8
CovEMERALD: Assessing the feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of remotely delivered Eye Movement Desensitisation and Reprocessing following Covid-19 related critical illness: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.CovEMERALD:评估新冠相关危重病后远程提供眼动脱敏再处理的可行性和初步效果:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Nov 17;21(1):929. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04805-1.
9
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home: a cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention to involve older people in their care (Your Care Needs You).提高从医院到家庭过渡的安全性与体验:一项让老年人参与自身护理的干预措施(“你的护理需要你”)的整群随机对照试验
Age Ageing. 2025 May 3;54(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf142.
2
Evaluating an intervention to improve the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home for older people (Your Care Needs You): a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation.评价一项干预措施,以改善老年人从医院到家庭过渡的安全性和体验(Your Care Needs You):一项集群随机对照试验和过程评估的方案。
Trials. 2023 Oct 14;24(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07716-z.

本文引用的文献

1
A qualitative formative evaluation of a patient facing intervention to improve care transitions for older people moving from hospital to home.一项针对改善老年人从医院到家庭过渡期间护理交接的患者导向干预措施的定性形成性评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2796-2806. doi: 10.1111/hex.13560. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
2
Doing involvement: A qualitative study exploring the 'work' of involvement enacted by older people and their carers during transition from hospital to home.参与实践:一项定性研究,探讨老年人及其照护者在从医院到家庭的过渡期间实施的参与“工作”。
Health Expect. 2021 Dec;24(6):1936-1947. doi: 10.1111/hex.13327. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
3
The challenges facing the NHS in England in 2021.
2021年英国国民保健制度面临的挑战。
BMJ. 2020 Dec 31;371:m4973. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4973.
4
Improving patient experience and safety at transitions of care through the Your Care Needs You (YCNY) intervention: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.通过“您的护理需要您”(YCNY)干预改善护理转接过程中的患者体验和安全:一项整群随机对照可行性试验的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 2;6:123. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00655-5. eCollection 2020.
5
Delivering exceptionally safe transitions of care to older people: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary staff perspectives.为老年人提供特别安全的医疗服务交接:一项多学科工作人员视角的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05641-4.
6
A systematic review of older patients' experiences and perceptions of communication about managing medication across transitions of care.一项关于老年患者在跨护理过渡中管理药物时的沟通体验和感知的系统评价。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 Feb;17(2):273-291. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
'Handing over to the patient': A FRAM analysis of transitional care combining multiple stakeholder perspectives.“交予患者手中”:从多个利益相关者视角分析过渡期护理中的交接工作。
Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103060. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103060. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
8
How to analyse longitudinal data from multiple sources in qualitative health research: the pen portrait analytic technique.如何在定性健康研究中分析来自多个来源的纵向数据:肖像分析技术。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Aug 2;19(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0810-0.
9
Developing a measure to assess the quality of care transitions for older people.开发一种评估老年人护理交接质量的工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 19;19(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4306-8.
10
How older people enact care involvement during transition from hospital to home: A systematic review and model.老年人如何在从医院到家庭的过渡期间参与护理:系统评价和模型。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):883-893. doi: 10.1111/hex.12930. Epub 2019 Jul 13.