• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解在医疗环境中实施“混合”干预措施的挑战与成功之处:一项患者参与试验的过程评估结果

Understanding the challenges and successes of implementing 'hybrid' interventions in healthcare settings: findings from a process evaluation of a patient involvement trial.

作者信息

Hampton Sarah, Murray Jenni, Lawton Rebecca, Sheard Laura

机构信息

Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

Yorkshire Quality and Safety Research Group, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jan 28;34(2):92-99. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017268.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017268
PMID:39107110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11874326/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

'Hybrid' interventions in which some intervention components are fixed across sites and others are flexible (locally created) are thought to allow for adaptation to the local context while maintaining fidelity. However, there is little evidence regarding the challenges and facilitators of implementing hybrid interventions. This paper reports on a process evaluation of a patient safety hybrid intervention called Your Care Needs You (YCNY). YCNY was tested in the Partners at Care Transitions (PACT) randomised controlled trial and aimed to enhance older patients and their families' involvement in their care in order to achieve safer transitions from hospital to home.

METHODS

The process evaluation took place across eight intervention wards taking part in the PACT trial. 23 interviews and 37 informal conversations were conducted with National Health Service (NHS) staff. Patients (n=19) were interviewed twice, once in hospital and once after discharge. Interviews with staff and patients concerned the delivery and experiences of YCNY. Ethnographic observations (n=81 hours) of relevant activities (eg, multidisciplinary team meetings, handovers, etc) were undertaken.

RESULTS

The main finding relates to how staff understood and engaged with YCNY, which then had a major influence on its implementation. While staff broadly valued the aims of YCNY, staff from seven out of the eight wards taking part in the process evaluation enacted YCNY in a mostly task-based manner. YCNY implementation often became a hurried activity which concentrated on delivering fixed intervention components rather than a catalyst for culture change around patient involvement. Factors such as understaffing, constraints on staff time and the COVID-19 pandemic contributed towards a 'taskification' of intervention delivery, which meant staff often did not have capacity to creatively devise flexible intervention components. However, one ward with a sense of distributed ownership of YCNY had considerable success implementing flexible components.

DISCUSSION

Hybrid interventions may allow aspects of an intervention to be adapted to the local context. However, the current constrained and pressured environment of the NHS left staff with little ability to creatively engage with devising flexible intervention components, despite recognising the need for and being motivated to deliver the intervention.

摘要

引言

“混合”干预是指一些干预组件在各地点是固定的,而其他组件是灵活的(在当地创建),人们认为这种干预在保持保真度的同时能够适应当地情况。然而,关于实施混合干预的挑战和促进因素的证据很少。本文报告了一项名为“您的护理需要您”(YCNY)的患者安全混合干预的过程评估。YCNY在“护理过渡伙伴关系”(PACT)随机对照试验中进行了测试,旨在增强老年患者及其家庭对其护理的参与度,以实现从医院到家庭的更安全过渡。

方法

过程评估在参与PACT试验的8个干预病房中进行。对国民保健服务(NHS)工作人员进行了23次访谈和37次非正式交谈。对19名患者进行了两次访谈,一次在医院,一次在出院后。与工作人员和患者的访谈涉及YCNY的实施和体验。对相关活动(如多学科团队会议、交接班等)进行了81小时的人种学观察。

结果

主要发现涉及工作人员如何理解和参与YCNY,这进而对其实施产生了重大影响。虽然工作人员普遍重视YCNY的目标,但参与过程评估的8个病房中有7个病房的工作人员大多以基于任务的方式实施YCNY。YCNY的实施往往变成一项匆忙的活动,集中于提供固定的干预组件,而不是围绕患者参与进行文化变革的催化剂。人员不足、工作人员时间受限以及新冠疫情等因素导致干预实施出现“任务化”,这意味着工作人员往往没有能力创造性地设计灵活的干预组件。然而,一个对YCNY有分布式所有权意识的病房在实施灵活组件方面取得了相当大的成功。

讨论

混合干预可能使干预的某些方面能够适应当地情况。然而,国民保健服务当前受限且压力大的环境使工作人员尽管认识到实施干预的必要性并有积极性,但几乎没有能力创造性地参与设计灵活的干预组件。

相似文献

1
Understanding the challenges and successes of implementing 'hybrid' interventions in healthcare settings: findings from a process evaluation of a patient involvement trial.了解在医疗环境中实施“混合”干预措施的挑战与成功之处:一项患者参与试验的过程评估结果
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jan 28;34(2):92-99. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017268.
2
Improving patient experience and safety at transitions of care through the Your Care Needs You (YCNY) intervention: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial.通过“您的护理需要您”(YCNY)干预改善护理转接过程中的患者体验和安全:一项整群随机对照可行性试验的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 2;6:123. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00655-5. eCollection 2020.
3
Evaluating an intervention to improve the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home for older people (Your Care Needs You): a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation.评价一项干预措施,以改善老年人从医院到家庭过渡的安全性和体验(Your Care Needs You):一项集群随机对照试验和过程评估的方案。
Trials. 2023 Oct 14;24(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07716-z.
4
Improving the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial of the 'Your Care Needs You' intervention versus usual care.改善从医院到家庭过渡的安全性和体验:一项“您的护理需要您”干预措施与常规护理的整群随机对照可行性试验。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Oct 1;8(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01180-3.
5
Improving the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home: a cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention to involve older people in their care (Your Care Needs You).提高从医院到家庭过渡的安全性与体验:一项让老年人参与自身护理的干预措施(“你的护理需要你”)的整群随机对照试验
Age Ageing. 2025 May 3;54(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf142.
6
A service-user digital intervention to collect real-time safety information on acute, adult mental health wards: the WardSonar mixed-methods study.服务用户数字干预措施,以实时收集急性成人精神科病房的安全信息:WardSonar 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 May;12(14):1-182. doi: 10.3310/UDBQ8402.
7
Implementing an artificial intelligence command centre in the NHS: a mixed-methods study.在英国国家医疗服务体系中实施人工智能指挥中心:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Oct;12(41):1-108. doi: 10.3310/TATM3277.
8
Health screening clinic to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism among NHS Staff: eTHOS a pilot RCT.健康筛查门诊减少 NHS 员工旷工和出勤主义:eTHOS 一项试点 RCT。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(23):1-105. doi: 10.3310/KDST3869.
9
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
10
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home: a cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention to involve older people in their care (Your Care Needs You).提高从医院到家庭过渡的安全性与体验:一项让老年人参与自身护理的干预措施(“你的护理需要你”)的整群随机对照试验
Age Ageing. 2025 May 3;54(5). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf142.
2
Are 'hybrid' interventions inherently self-sabotaging?“混合式”干预措施本质上是否会自我破坏?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Jan 28;34(2):70-72. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-018017.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating an intervention to improve the safety and experience of transitions from hospital to home for older people (Your Care Needs You): a protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation.评价一项干预措施,以改善老年人从医院到家庭过渡的安全性和体验(Your Care Needs You):一项集群随机对照试验和过程评估的方案。
Trials. 2023 Oct 14;24(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07716-z.
2
Unpacking the Cinderella black box of complex intervention development through the Partners at Care Transitions (PACT) programme of research.通过关爱过渡合作伙伴(PACT)计划研究,揭开复杂干预措施开发的灰姑娘黑盒子。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1478-1490. doi: 10.1111/hex.13682. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
A qualitative formative evaluation of a patient facing intervention to improve care transitions for older people moving from hospital to home.一项针对改善老年人从医院到家庭过渡期间护理交接的患者导向干预措施的定性形成性评价。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2796-2806. doi: 10.1111/hex.13560. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
4
What fuels suboptimal care of peripheral intravenous catheter-related infections in hospitals? A qualitative study of decision-making among Spanish nurses.是什么导致医院对外周静脉导管相关感染的护理不尽人意?西班牙护士决策的定性研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Aug 19;11(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01144-5.
5
Doing involvement: A qualitative study exploring the 'work' of involvement enacted by older people and their carers during transition from hospital to home.参与实践:一项定性研究,探讨老年人及其照护者在从医院到家庭的过渡期间实施的参与“工作”。
Health Expect. 2021 Dec;24(6):1936-1947. doi: 10.1111/hex.13327. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
6
'Handing over to the patient': A FRAM analysis of transitional care combining multiple stakeholder perspectives.“交予患者手中”:从多个利益相关者视角分析过渡期护理中的交接工作。
Appl Ergon. 2020 May;85:103060. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103060. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
7
How older people enact care involvement during transition from hospital to home: A systematic review and model.老年人如何在从医院到家庭的过渡期间参与护理:系统评价和模型。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):883-893. doi: 10.1111/hex.12930. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
8
Scaffolding our systems? Patients and families 'reaching in' as a source of healthcare resilience.支撑我们的系统?患者和家庭“主动参与”作为医疗恢复力的一个来源。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):3-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008216. Epub 2018 May 15.
9
Implementation science at the crossroads.处于十字路口的实施科学。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):331-332. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007502. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
10
Exploring how ward staff engage with the implementation of a patient safety intervention: a UK-based qualitative process evaluation.探索病房工作人员如何参与患者安全干预措施的实施:一项基于英国的定性过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 13;7(7):e014558. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014558.