Lord Rabbi Immanuel Jakobovits Center for Jewish Medical Ethics, Joyce and Irving Goldman School of Medicine, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
Yale J Biol Med. 2022 Sep 30;95(3):355-358. eCollection 2022 Sep.
In an era of evidence-based medicine and an increasing use of technology the question is raised again as to what extent emotions should play in medical and ethical decision-making. While clearly the correct facts in each case are a for ethical decision-making, and one should evaluate each situation rationally in accord with accepted ethical principles, the appropriate role of the emotions in decision-making is gaining increased attention in part as a result of newer research in neuroethics. In end-of-life care there often exists a disconnect between the "rational" analysis by many philosophers and ethicists and the emotional reactions of many physicians and nurses with respect to the comparison between withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. It is suggested that these attitudes of many health care workers should not be ignored because they represent a critical, almost universal, and laudable value of reluctance to take human life, a value so strongly ingrained in the ethos of the medical profession.
在循证医学和技术日益普及的时代,人们再次提出这样一个问题,即在医疗和伦理决策中,情感应该在多大程度上发挥作用。虽然在每个案例中,正确的事实显然是伦理决策的基础,并且应该根据公认的伦理原则理性地评估每种情况,但情感在决策中的适当作用越来越受到关注,部分原因是神经伦理学的新研究。在临终关怀中,许多哲学家和伦理学家的“理性”分析与许多医生和护士对维持生命治疗的 withholding 和 withdrawal 之间的情感反应之间经常存在脱节。有人认为,不应该忽视这些医疗保健工作者的态度,因为它们代表了一种对人类生命的抗拒的批判的、几乎普遍的、值得称赞的价值观,这种价值观深深植根于医学专业的精神之中。