• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
"It Works for Me": Pseudotherapy Use is Associated With Trust in Their Efficacy Rather Than Belief in Their Scientific Validity.“对我有效”:伪疗法的使用与对其疗效的信任有关,而不是对其科学有效性的信念。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;67:1604594. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604594. eCollection 2022.
2
Belief that Progress has Been Made in Curing Cancer Varies by Perception of Social Media Health Mis- and Disinformation, Education, Frequency of Social Media Use, and Healthcare System Trust: A Cross-Sectional Study.相信在治愈癌症方面已经取得进展的程度因对社交媒体健康错误和虚假信息的看法、教育程度、社交媒体使用频率以及对医疗保健系统的信任程度而异:一项横断面研究。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241289259. doi: 10.1177/10732748241289259.
3
Perceptions of risk from nanotechnologies and trust in stakeholders: a cross sectional study of public, academic, government and business attitudes.对纳米技术风险的认知与对利益相关者的信任:一项关于公众、学术、政府和企业态度的横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2015 Apr 26;15:424. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1795-1.
4
Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science.关于 COVID-19 的错误信息:不同潜在特征的证据,以及与对科学的信任之间的强关联。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x.
5
Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science.对公众效能的信念、信任以及对现代基因科学的态度。
Risk Anal. 2007 Aug;27(4):921-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00932.x.
6
Scientific Appearance and Homeopathy. Determinants of Trust in Complementary and Alternative Medicine.科学表象与顺势疗法。补充与替代医学的信任决定因素。
Health Commun. 2021 Sep;36(10):1278-1285. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1750764. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
7
Role of gender in perspectives of discrimination, stigma, and attitudes relative to cervical cancer in rural Sénégal.性别在塞内加尔农村地区对宫颈癌的歧视、污名和态度方面的作用。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232291. eCollection 2020.
8
Changes in trust and the use of Korean medicine in South Korea: a comparison of surveys in 2011 and 2014.韩国民众对韩医信任度的变化及韩医使用情况:2011年与2014年调查比较
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2017 Sep 16;17(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-1969-8.
9
Factors associated with a positive attitude towards receiving cancer information: a population-based study in Spain.与对接受癌症信息持积极态度相关的因素:西班牙一项基于人群的研究。
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):288-98. doi: 10.1111/hex.12349. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
10
Association between trust in the public healthcare system and selecting a surgeon in public hospitals in Israel: a cross-sectional population study.信任公立医院的公共医疗体系与选择公立医院的外科医生之间的关联:一项横断面的人群研究。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2020 Jul 27;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13584-020-00396-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The combined effect of patient classification systems and availability of resources can bias the judgments of treatment effectiveness.患者分类系统和资源可用性的综合影响可能会使治疗效果的判断产生偏差。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 7;15(1):15915. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01043-w.
2
"The Dark Side of Musculoskeletal Care": Why Do Ineffective Techniques Seem to Work? A Comprehensive Review of Complementary and Alternative Therapies.《肌肉骨骼护理的阴暗面》:为何无效的技术似乎有效?补充和替代疗法的全面综述
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 6;13(2):392. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13020392.

本文引用的文献

1
Diseases that resolve spontaneously can increase the belief that ineffective treatments work.有些疾病会自行缓解,这会让人误以为无效的治疗方法是有效的。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jun;255:113012. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113012. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
2
Scientific Appearance and Homeopathy. Determinants of Trust in Complementary and Alternative Medicine.科学表象与顺势疗法。补充与替代医学的信任决定因素。
Health Commun. 2021 Sep;36(10):1278-1285. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1750764. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
3
Protecting consumers from fraudulent health claims: A taxonomy of psychological drivers, interventions, barriers, and treatments.保护消费者免受欺诈性健康声明的影响:心理驱动因素、干预措施、障碍和治疗方法的分类。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Aug;259:112790. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112790. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
4
Causal illusion as a cognitive basis of pseudoscientific beliefs.因果错觉作为伪科学信仰的认知基础。
Br J Psychol. 2020 Nov;111(4):840-852. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12441. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
5
Differences in healthcare utilisation between users and non-users of homeopathic products in Spain: Results from three waves of the National Health Survey (2011-2017).西班牙使用和未使用顺势疗法产品的人群在医疗保健利用方面的差异:来自三次全国健康调查(2011-2017 年)的数据结果。
PLoS One. 2019 May 13;14(5):e0216707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216707. eCollection 2019.
6
Complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer: A systematic review.癌症患者对补充替代医学的使用:系统评价。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2019 May;35:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
[Sociodemographic profile of the homeopathy user in Spain].[西班牙顺势疗法使用者的社会人口统计学概况]
Aten Primaria. 2019 Oct;51(8):499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
"Do-it-yourself": Vaccine rejection and complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).“自己动手”:疫苗抵制与补充替代医学(CAM)。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jan;196:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.022. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Europe: Health-related and sociodemographic determinants.欧洲补充和替代医学的使用:与健康相关和社会人口统计学的决定因素。
Scand J Public Health. 2018 Jun;46(4):448-455. doi: 10.1177/1403494817733869. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
10
The social and behavioural determinants of health in Europe: findings from the European Social Survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.欧洲健康问题的社会和行为决定因素:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康问题社会决定因素特别模块的研究结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):55-62. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw231.

“对我有效”:伪疗法的使用与对其疗效的信任有关,而不是对其科学有效性的信念。

"It Works for Me": Pseudotherapy Use is Associated With Trust in Their Efficacy Rather Than Belief in Their Scientific Validity.

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Joint Research Institute National Distance Education University and Health Institute Carlos III (IMIENS), Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Public Health. 2022 Sep 16;67:1604594. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604594. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/ijph.2022.1604594
PMID:36188754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9522909/
Abstract

To identify how perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs towards pseudotherapies, health, medicine, and the public health system influence the pseudotherapy use in Spain. We carried out a cross-sectional study using the Survey of Social Perception of Science and Technology-2018 (5,200 interviews). Dependent variable: ever use of pseudotherapies. Covariables: attitude towards medicine, health and public health system; perceived health; assessment of the scientific character of homeopathy/acupuncture. The association was estimated using prevalence ratios obtained by Poisson regression models. The model was adjusted for age and socioeconomic variables. Pseudotherapy use was higher in women (24.9%) than in men (14.2%) ( < 0.001). The probability of use in men ( < 0.001) and women ( < 0.001) increases with the belief in pseudotherapies' usefulness. Among men, a proactive attitude (reference: passive) towards medicine and health (RP:1.3), and a negative (reference: positive) assessment of the quality of the public health system increased use-probability (RP:1.2). For women, poor health perceived (referencie: good) increased likelihood of use (RP:1.2). Pseudotherapy use in Spain was associated with confidence in its usefulness irrespective of users' assessment of its scientific validity.

摘要

为了确定人们对伪疗法、健康、医学和公共卫生系统的看法、态度和信念如何影响西班牙伪疗法的使用,我们进行了一项横断面研究,使用了 2018 年社会科学技术感知调查(5200 次访谈)。因变量:曾经使用过伪疗法。协变量:对医学、健康和公共卫生系统的态度;感知健康;对顺势疗法/针灸的科学性质的评估。使用泊松回归模型获得的患病率比来估计关联。该模型调整了年龄和社会经济变量。女性(24.9%)比男性(14.2%)更倾向于使用伪疗法(<0.001)。男性(<0.001)和女性(<0.001)使用的概率随着对伪疗法有效性的信念而增加。在男性中,对医学和健康的积极(参考:被动)态度(RP:1.3),以及对公共卫生系统质量的消极(参考:积极)评估,增加了使用的可能性(RP:1.2)。对于女性,感知到的健康状况较差(参考:良好)增加了使用的可能性(RP:1.2)。在西班牙,伪疗法的使用与对其有效性的信心有关,而不论使用者对其科学有效性的评估如何。