Suppr超能文献

大马士革玫瑰局部应用和口服对成人急性疼痛的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effects of Topical Application and Oral Intake of Rosa damascena on Acute Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Koohpayeh Seyedeh Atefeh, Hosseini Meimanat, Nasiri Morteza, Rezaei Masoud

机构信息

Student Research Committee, Department of Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Community Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Oman Med J. 2022 Sep 30;37(5):e412. doi: 10.5001/omj.2022.33. eCollection 2022 Sep.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of available studies regarding the effects of the traditional herb (as topical application and oral intake) on the severity of acute pain in adults.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed on the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scientific Information Database, and Magiran from inception to 20 March 2021. We included parallel-group and cross-over randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of any products containing in oral and topical administration forms to placebo, non-treatment, or conventional treatment. Two researchers independently performed the document screening and selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. A random-effect model was used to pool the data.

RESULTS

From a total of 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria, four studies administered through topical application and seven by oral intake. Nine studies recruited only females. Ten studies had parallel-group design, while one adopted cross-over design. The oral intake of reduced pain severity non-significantly (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.55, 95% CI: -1.27-0.17; 0.132). However, the topical application of this treatment had no pain-alleviating effect (SMD = 0.10, 95% CI: -0.75-0.96; 0.814). One study reported mild allergic rhinitis as an adverse effect of the treatment. Risk of bias assessment revealed that three of the eleven studies had good methodological quality, six had fair quality, and two were of poor quality.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that the oral intake of may have a non-significant alleviating effect on acute pain severity in adults. However, its topical application has not shown pain-alleviating effect. More robust randomized controlled trials are needed for accurate estimation of the effects of oral and topical use of on the severity of different types of acute pain in adults.

摘要

目的

对现有关于传统草药(局部应用和口服)对成人急性疼痛严重程度影响的研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

对以下数据库进行系统检索:Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、PubMed、Scopus、科学网核心合集、Embase、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、科学信息数据库以及自创建至2021年3月20日的Magiran。我们纳入了平行组和交叉随机对照试验,这些试验比较了任何含该草药的口服和局部给药形式的产品与安慰剂、非治疗或传统治疗的效果。两名研究人员独立进行文献筛选和选择、数据提取以及偏倚风险评估。采用随机效应模型汇总数据。

结果

在总共11项符合纳入标准的研究中,4项研究通过局部应用该草药,7项通过口服。9项研究仅招募女性。10项研究采用平行组设计,1项采用交叉设计。口服该草药对疼痛严重程度的降低无显著意义(标准化均数差(SMD)=-0.55,95%置信区间:-1.27 - 0.17;P = 0.132)。然而,局部应用该治疗无减轻疼痛的效果(SMD = 0.10,95%置信区间:-0.75 - 0.96;P = 0.814)。一项研究报告轻度过敏性鼻炎为该治疗的不良反应。偏倚风险评估显示,11项研究中有3项方法学质量良好,6项质量中等,2项质量较差。

结论

本系统评价和荟萃分析表明,口服该草药可能对成人急性疼痛严重程度有不显著的减轻作用。然而,其局部应用未显示出减轻疼痛的效果。需要更有力的随机对照试验来准确评估口服和局部应用该草药对成人不同类型急性疼痛严重程度的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验