• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童急诊科就诊儿童的 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断方法的一致性。

Agreement between diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 infection in children seen at the Emergency Department of a children's hospital.

机构信息

Departamento de Urgencia, Hospital de Niños R. Gutiérrez, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Unidad Febril de Urgencia, Hospital de Niños R. Gutiérrez, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Arch Argent Pediatr. 2022 Oct;120(5):325-331. doi: 10.5546/aap.2022.eng.325. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

DOI:10.5546/aap.2022.eng.325
PMID:36190216
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rapid antigen tests (RAgTs) for SARS-CoV-2 are considered adequate for diagnosis at the point of care. Our objective was to establish the agreement between reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) and RAgTs in the pediatric population.

POPULATION AND METHODS

All patients aged 1 month to 17 years and 11 months seen at the Emergency Fever Unit of a children's hospital between 6-11-2021 and 10-3-2021 were recruited. The Panbio COVID-19 Ag® test (Abbott Diagnostic) was compared to the reference method RT-qPCR (as per the protocol suggested by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

RESULTS

A total of 6491 patients were included. The prevalence of COVID-19 was 2.8%. Symptoms were observed in 92.1%. Sensitivity, specificity, and the kappa index of agreement for the RAgT were 71.0%, 99.9%, and 0.813, respectively. The kappa index and the RAgT sensitivity were significantly higher in the group aged 13-17 years (0.89 and 82.4%, respectively) compared to the groups aged 0-5 and 6-12 years. This may be due to the lower viral load observed in patients younger than 12 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Although RAgTs shorten the time to result and improve the isolation strategy for COVID-19 patients, their sensitivity in children younger than 12 years or asymptomatic children is not within the recommended ranges, especially during periods of low disease prevalence.

摘要

简介

SARS-CoV-2 的快速抗原检测(RAgT)被认为可在护理点进行充分诊断。我们的目的是确定 RAgT 在儿科人群中与逆转录-定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)的一致性。

人群和方法

2021 年 11 月 6 日至 3 月 10 日期间,在一家儿童医院的急诊发热科就诊的所有 1 个月至 17 岁零 11 个月的患者均被纳入研究。Panbio COVID-19 Ag® 检测(雅培诊断)与参考方法 RT-qPCR(根据美国疾病控制与预防中心的方案)进行比较。

结果

共纳入 6491 例患者。COVID-19 的患病率为 2.8%。92.1%的患者有症状。RAgT 的敏感性、特异性和一致性kappa 指数分别为 71.0%、99.9%和 0.813。与 0-5 岁和 6-12 岁组相比,13-17 岁组的 kappa 指数和 RAgT 敏感性更高(分别为 0.89 和 82.4%)。这可能是由于 12 岁以下患者的病毒载量较低所致。

结论

尽管 RAgT 缩短了获得结果的时间并改善了 COVID-19 患者的隔离策略,但在 12 岁以下儿童或无症状儿童中,其敏感性不在推荐范围内,尤其是在疾病低流行期间。

相似文献

1
Agreement between diagnostic methods for SARS-CoV-2 infection in children seen at the Emergency Department of a children's hospital.儿童急诊科就诊儿童的 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断方法的一致性。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2022 Oct;120(5):325-331. doi: 10.5546/aap.2022.eng.325. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
[Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests in COVID-19 Patients].[评估新冠病毒快速抗原检测在新冠肺炎患者中的诊断性能]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Apr;56(2):251-262. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229805.
3
Comparison of antigen test and polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 in children younger than 12 years.比较抗原检测和聚合酶链反应在 12 岁以下儿童中的 SARS-CoV-2 检测。
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2022 Oct;120(5):336-339. doi: 10.5546/aap.2022.eng.336. Epub 2022 Aug 19.
4
Panbio antigen rapid test is reliable to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first 7 days after the onset of symptoms.Panbio 抗原快速检测在症状出现后 7 天内对诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染是可靠的。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104659. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104659. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
5
Think of the Children: Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test in Pediatric Population.为孩子们着想:儿科人群中新型冠状病毒2型快速抗原检测的评估
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 May 1;40(5):385-388. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003101.
6
Prospective evaluation of the point-of-care use of a rapid antigenic SARS-CoV-2 immunochromatographic test in a paediatric emergency department.在儿科急诊中使用即时 SARS-CoV-2 抗原免疫层析检测的前瞻性评估。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 May;28(5):734.e1-734.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.12.019. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
7
Acceptance of Different Self-sampling Methods for Semiweekly SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Asymptomatic Children and Childcare Workers at German Day Care Centers: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.接受不同的自我采样方法用于无症状儿童和日托中心儿童保育工作者的半周 SARS-CoV-2 检测:一项非随机对照试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231798. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31798.
8
[Evaluation of two COVID-19 antigenic diagnostic tests: and compared to ].[两种新冠病毒抗原诊断检测的评估:与……相比的……和……] (由于原文中具体的检测名称缺失,翻译可能不够完整准确)
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Aug 6;39:228. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.39.228.30752. eCollection 2021.
9
Frontline Screening for SARS-CoV-2 Infection at Emergency Department Admission by Third Generation Rapid Antigen Test: Can We Spare RT-qPCR?第三代快速抗原检测在急诊科入院时对SARS-CoV-2感染进行一线筛查:我们能否省去逆转录定量聚合酶链反应检测?
Viruses. 2021 May 1;13(5):818. doi: 10.3390/v13050818.
10
Real-life evaluation of a COVID-19 rapid antigen detection test in hospitalized children.在院儿童中 COVID-19 快速抗原检测的真实世界评估。
J Med Virol. 2021 Oct;93(10):6040-6044. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27149. Epub 2021 Jul 1.