Glindmeyer H W, Jones R N, Barkman H W, Weill H
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987 Aug;136(2):449-52. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/136.2.449.
Quantitative test criteria have been developed to assess the acceptability of spirometric tracings. Most automated spirometers have been programmed with the criteria in order to assist in data collection. These instruments compare computed parameters from the collected tracings with the criteria and, after 3 acceptable FVC maneuvers have been collected, print out a statement indicating that "tests meet acceptability criteria." Technicians, nurses, and even their medical supervisors are beginning to rely on these statements as assuring overall test quality. However, a review of actual curves indicates that unacceptable results can be obtained from tests that comply with these standards. Although quantitative test criteria are a positive step toward quality assurance, they should be treated as they were developed, as "minimum" criteria. All curves should be inspected for visible defects, especially if the results are used to follow subjects longitudinally.
已经制定了定量测试标准来评估肺量计描记图的可接受性。大多数自动肺量计都已根据这些标准进行编程,以协助数据收集。这些仪器将收集到的描记图的计算参数与标准进行比较,在收集到3次可接受的用力肺活量(FVC)动作后,打印出一份声明,表明“测试符合可接受标准”。技术人员、护士甚至他们的医学主管开始依赖这些声明来确保整体测试质量。然而,对实际曲线的审查表明,符合这些标准的测试可能会得到不可接受的结果。尽管定量测试标准是朝着质量保证迈出的积极一步,但它们应按照其制定初衷,被视为“最低”标准。所有曲线都应检查是否存在明显缺陷,特别是当结果用于纵向跟踪受试者时。