Department of Biology and Chemistry, Morehead State Universitygrid.260234.1, Morehead, Kentucky, USA.
J Bacteriol. 2022 Nov 15;204(11):e0016522. doi: 10.1128/jb.00165-22. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
Acinetobacter baumannii strain 17978 is an opportunistic pathogen with a unique DNA damage repair response that lacks the LexA repressor but induces ~150 genes after DNA damage. It uses the UmuD homolog UmuDAb and the small protein DdrR, unique to Acinetobacter, to repress multiple horizontally acquired error-prone polymerase genes through an unknown mechanism. We used reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and immunoblotting to elucidate UmuDAb regulatory requirements and DdrR contributions to the corepression of this specialized regulon. Mutations in the putative UmuDAb helix-turn-helix (HTH) domain could not repress the expression of the UmuDAb/DdrR regulon. A insertion mutation in these HTH mutant backgrounds produced even greater derepression of the regulon, suggesting that DdrR exerts an additional level of control over this mutagenic response. These HTH mutant A. baumannii cells overexpressed UmuDAb, cleaving it after treatment with the DNA-damaging agent mitomycin C. This showed that DdrR was not required for UmuDAb self-cleavage and that UmuDAb repression and self-cleavage actions were independent. An uncleavable mutant with an A-to-Y change at position 83 (A83Y) could neither induce the UmuDAb/DdrR regulon nor conduct SOS mutagenesis. However, a prophage-encoded operon was still partially induced after DNA damage in this mutant. Surprisingly, that prophage's putative repressor was dispensable for prophage-encoded induction, implying another repressor's involvement. This study revealed that UmuDAb behaves like LexA, requiring an N-terminal HTH motif for repression and C-terminal self-cleavage for gene induction and subsequent SOS mutagenesis, and DdrR cooperates with it to exert an additional level of repressive control on this pathogen's mutagenic response to DNA damage. Acinetobacter baumannii is a nosocomial pathogen that acquires antibiotic resistance genes through conjugative transfer and carries out a robust mutagenic DNA damage response. After exposure to conditions typically encountered in health care settings, such as antibiotics, UV light, and desiccation, this species induces error-prone UmuD'C polymerases. This mutagenic capability increases A. baumannii survival and virulence and is regulated by the UmuDAb/DdrR corepressor system unique to the Acinetobacter genus. Our study has revealed that the DdrR protein provides an additional layer of control in preventing mutagenic polymerase expression by enhancing UmuDAb repression actions. Understanding these repressors could lead to new drug targets, as multidrug resistance in hospital-acquired infections has decreased treatment options, with limited new drugs being developed.
鲍曼不动杆菌 17978 株是一种机会性病原体,具有独特的 DNA 损伤修复反应,缺乏 LexA 阻遏物,但在 DNA 损伤后诱导约 150 个基因。它利用 UmuD 同源物 UmuDAb 和 Acinetobacter 特有的小蛋白 DdrR,通过未知机制抑制多种水平获得的易错聚合酶基因。我们使用逆转录定量 PCR 和免疫印迹来阐明 UmuDAb 的调节要求和 DdrR 对该特化调节子的核心抑制作用。假定的 UmuDAb 螺旋-转角-螺旋 (HTH) 结构域中的突变不能抑制 UmuDAb/DdrR 调节子的表达。这些 HTH 突变背景中的 插入突变甚至产生了更大的调节子去抑制,表明 DdrR 对这种诱变反应施加了额外的控制。这些 HTH 突变的鲍曼不动杆菌细胞过度表达 UmuDAb,在用 DNA 损伤剂丝裂霉素 C 处理后切割它。这表明 DdrR 不需要 UmuDAb 的自我切割,并且 UmuDAb 的抑制和自我切割作用是独立的。位置 83 处 A 到 Y 变化的不可切割的 突变体(A83Y)既不能诱导 UmuDAb/DdrR 调节子,也不能进行 SOS 诱变。然而,在这种突变体中,噬菌体编码的 操纵子在 DNA 损伤后仍然部分诱导。令人惊讶的是,该噬菌体的假定阻遏物对于噬菌体编码的 诱导是可有可无的,暗示了另一个阻遏物的参与。这项研究表明,UmuDAb 表现得像 LexA 一样,需要 N 端 HTH 基序来抑制,C 端自我切割来诱导基因表达和随后的 SOS 诱变,并且 DdrR 与之合作,对这种病原体对 DNA 损伤的诱变反应施加额外的抑制控制。鲍曼不动杆菌是一种医院获得性病原体,通过共轭转移获得抗生素耐药基因,并进行强大的诱变 DNA 损伤反应。在暴露于通常在医疗保健环境中遇到的条件下,如抗生素、紫外线和干燥后,该物种诱导易错的 UmuD'C 聚合酶。这种诱变能力增加了鲍曼不动杆菌的存活和毒力,并受到 Acinetobacter 属特有的 UmuDAb/DdrR 核心抑制系统的调节。我们的研究表明,DdrR 蛋白通过增强 UmuDAb 抑制作用提供了防止诱变聚合酶表达的额外控制层。了解这些阻遏物可能会导致新的药物靶点,因为医院获得性感染中的多药耐药性降低了治疗选择,而新开发的药物有限。