Suppr超能文献

具有 LexA/UmuD 嵌合特性的 Acinetobacter 调节 UmuDAb 蛋白可响应 DNA 损伤而切割。

The Acinetobacter regulatory UmuDAb protein cleaves in response to DNA damage with chimeric LexA/UmuD characteristics.

机构信息

Department of Biology and Chemistry, Morehead State University, KY, USA.

出版信息

FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012 Sep;334(1):57-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02618.x. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

Abstract

In the DNA damage response of most bacteria, UmuD forms part of the error-prone (UmuD'(2) )C polymerase V and is activated for this function by self-cleavage after DNA damage. However, the umuD homolog (umuDAb) present throughout the Acinetobacter genus encodes an extra N-terminal region, and in Acinetobacter baylyi, regulates transcription of DNA damage-induced genes. UmuDAb expressed in cells was correspondingly larger (24 kDa) than the Escherichia coli UmuD (15 kDa). DNA damage from mitomycin C or UV exposure caused UmuDAb cleavage in both E. coli wild-type and ΔumuD cells on a timescale resembling UmuD, but did not require UmuD. Like the self-cleaving serine proteases LexA and UmuD, UmuDAb required RecA for cleavage. This cleavage produced a UmuDAb' fragment of a size consistent with the predicted cleavage site of Ala83-Gly84. Site-directed mutations at Ala83 abolished cleavage, as did mutations at either the Ser119 or Lys156 predicted enzymatic residues. Co-expression of the cleavage site mutant and an enzymatic mutant did not allow cleavage, demonstrating a strictly intramolecular mechanism of cleavage that more closely resembles the LexA-type repressors than UmuD. These data show that UmuDAb undergoes a post-translational, LexA-like cleavage event after DNA damage, possibly to achieve its regulatory action.

摘要

在大多数细菌的 DNA 损伤反应中,UmuD 形成易错(UmuD'(2))C 聚合酶 V 的一部分,并在 DNA 损伤后通过自我切割而被激活。然而,整个不动杆菌属中的 umuD 同源物(umuDAb)编码一个额外的 N 端区域,在鲍氏不动杆菌中,它调节 DNA 损伤诱导基因的转录。在细胞中表达的 UmuDAb 比大肠杆菌的 UmuD(15 kDa)更大(24 kDa)。丝裂霉素 C 或紫外线照射造成的 DNA 损伤在大肠杆菌野生型和 ΔumuD 细胞中引起 UmuDAb 的切割,其时间尺度类似于 UmuD,但不需要 UmuD。与自我切割丝氨酸蛋白酶 LexA 和 UmuD 一样,UmuDAb 需要 RecA 进行切割。这种切割产生了一个大小与预测的 Ala83-Gly84 切割位点一致的 UmuDAb'片段。在 Ala83 处的定点突变消除了切割,在预测的酶残基 Ser119 或 Lys156 处的突变也是如此。切割位点突变体和酶突变体的共表达不允许切割,这表明切割是一种严格的分子内机制,更类似于 LexA 型抑制剂,而不是 UmuD。这些数据表明,UmuDAb 在 DNA 损伤后经历了一种翻译后、类似于 LexA 的切割事件,可能是为了实现其调节作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Locking down SOS Mutagenesis Repression in a Dynamic Pathogen.锁定动态病原体中的 SOS 诱变抑制。
J Bacteriol. 2022 Nov 15;204(11):e0022022. doi: 10.1128/jb.00220-22. Epub 2022 Oct 4.

本文引用的文献

3
The dimeric SOS mutagenesis protein UmuD is active as a monomer.二聚体 SOS 诱变蛋白 UmuD 以单体形式发挥活性。
J Biol Chem. 2011 Feb 4;286(5):3607-17. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.167254. Epub 2010 Nov 29.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验