Morris Sue E, Revette Anna C, Brandoff Douglas E, Leiter Richard E, Sannes Timothy S, Thomas Jane deLima
Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2023 Apr;26(4):472-480. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0331. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
As the field of palliative care continues to grow, many clinicians will care for patients with whom they have personal connections. Breaching the boundary between a clinician's personal and professional life is potentially an unrecognized risk for burnout. We explored the challenges of caring for patients personally known to clinicians and the types of support needed, with a view to developing preliminary practice guidelines. Focus groups. Thirteen psychosocial oncology and palliative care clinicians who care for adult patients participated in one of two focus groups. Six participants were physicians, four were nurse practitioner/registered nurse/physician assistant (NP/RN/PAs), and three were psychosocial clinicians. Using NVivo 12, we analyzed focus group transcripts from clinicians about their experiences caring for patients they know personally, the impact of such experiences, and the type of support and guidelines that could benefit clinicians in these unique situations. Navigating boundaries and managing the psychological impact on the clinician, including fear of negative evaluation, increased anxiety and emotional exhaustion were the most challenging aspects of providing such care. Suggested guidelines include an early team meeting, a buddy system, a conversation guide to address the dual relationship, and embedded psychological support and mentorship. Feedback from clinicians identified preliminary guidelines that incorporate tools palliative care teams can use to improve support for clinicians caring for patients with whom they have a personal connection. These tools address the psychosocial aspects of care and have the potential to help clinicians feel a greater sense of control in these often, challenging and emotionally taxing situations.
随着姑息治疗领域的不断发展,许多临床医生将为与他们有私人关系的患者提供护理。突破临床医生个人生活与职业生活之间的界限可能是一种未被认识到的职业倦怠风险。我们探讨了照顾临床医生认识的患者所面临的挑战以及所需的支持类型,以期制定初步的实践指南。焦点小组。13名照顾成年患者的心理社会肿瘤学和姑息治疗临床医生参加了两个焦点小组中的一个。6名参与者是医生,4名是执业护士/注册护士/医师助理(NP/RN/PA),3名是心理社会临床医生。我们使用NVivo 12分析了临床医生关于他们照顾认识的患者的经历、此类经历的影响以及在这些特殊情况下可能使临床医生受益的支持和指南类型的焦点小组记录。界定界限以及管理对临床医生的心理影响,包括对负面评价的恐惧、焦虑增加和情绪疲惫,是提供此类护理最具挑战性的方面。建议的指南包括早期团队会议、伙伴制度、处理双重关系的对话指南,以及嵌入式心理支持和指导。临床医生的反馈确定了初步指南,其中纳入了姑息治疗团队可用于改善对照顾与他们有私人关系的患者的临床医生的支持的工具。这些工具涉及护理的心理社会方面,有可能帮助临床医生在这些通常具有挑战性和情感负担的情况下获得更强的掌控感。