College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Nov;313:115397. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115397. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
The rate of improvement in mortality slowed across many high-income countries after 2010. Following the 2007-08 financial crisis, macroeconomic policy was dominated by austerity as countries attempted to address perceived problems of growing state debt and government budget deficits. This study estimates the impact of austerity on mortality trends for 37 high-income countries between 2000 and 2019.
We fitted a suite of fixed-effects panel regression models to mortality data (period life expectancy, age-standardised mortality rates (ASMRs), age-stratified mortality rates and lifespan variation). Austerity was measured using the Alesina-Ardagna Fiscal Index (AAFI), Cyclically-Adjusted Primary Balance (CAPB), real indexed Government Expenditure, and Public Social Spending as a % of GDP. Sensitivity analyses varied the lag times, and confined the panel to economic downturns and to non-oil-dominated economies.
Slower improvements, or deteriorations, in life expectancy and mortality trends were seen in the majority of countries, with the worst trends in England & Wales, Estonia, Iceland, Scotland, Slovenia, and the USA, with generally worse trends for females than males. Austerity was implemented across all countries for at least some time when measured by AAFI and CAPB, and for many countries across all four measures (and particularly after 2010). Austerity adversely impacted life expectancy, ASMR, age-specific mortality and lifespan variation trends when measured with Government Expenditure, Public Social Spending and CAPB, but not with AAFI. However, when the dataset was restricted to periods of economic downturn and in economies not dominated hydrocarbon production, all measures of austerity were found to reduce the rate of mortality improvement.
Stalled mortality trends and austerity are widespread phenomena across high-income countries. Austerity is likely to be a cause of stalled mortality trends. Governments should consider alternative economic policy approaches if these harmful population health impacts are to be avoided.
2010 年后,许多高收入国家的死亡率改善速度放缓。2007-08 年金融危机后,各国试图解决日益严重的国家债务和政府预算赤字问题,宏观经济政策以紧缩为主。本研究估计 2000 年至 2019 年期间 37 个高收入国家的紧缩政策对死亡率趋势的影响。
我们使用一系列固定效应面板回归模型对死亡率数据(期间预期寿命、年龄标准化死亡率(ASMR)、年龄分层死亡率和寿命变化)进行拟合。紧缩政策用 Alesina-Ardagna 财政指数(AAFI)、周期性调整的初级余额(CAPB)、实际指数化政府支出和公共社会支出占 GDP 的百分比来衡量。敏感性分析改变了滞后时间,并将面板限制在经济衰退和非石油主导的经济体中。
大多数国家的预期寿命和死亡率趋势改善或恶化速度放缓,英格兰和威尔士、爱沙尼亚、冰岛、苏格兰、斯洛文尼亚和美国的情况最差,女性的趋势通常比男性更差。AAFI 和 CAPB 衡量的所有国家都至少在一段时间内实施了紧缩政策,而对许多国家来说,所有四个指标都实施了紧缩政策(尤其是 2010 年后)。当用政府支出、公共社会支出和 CAPB 衡量时,紧缩政策对预期寿命、ASMR、年龄特定死亡率和寿命变化趋势产生了不利影响,但用 AAFI 衡量时则没有。然而,当数据集仅限于经济衰退时期和非碳氢化合物生产主导的经济体时,发现所有紧缩政策衡量标准都降低了死亡率改善的速度。
高收入国家普遍存在死亡率趋势停滞不前和紧缩政策的现象。紧缩政策可能是死亡率趋势停滞不前的一个原因。如果要避免这些对人口健康产生有害影响的政策,政府应考虑采取替代的经济政策方法。