Colomar Joshua, Corbi Francisco, Baiget Ernest
National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain.
Sport Performance Analysis Research Group (SPARG), University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
J Hum Kinet. 2022 Apr 26;82:5-15. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2022-0026. eCollection 2022 Apr.
The goal of this study was to investigate side-to-side differences and asymmetries regarding muscle characteristics in young tennis players. Thirty-four participants performed contractile property measurements (stiffness, tone, elasticity and time to relaxation) on the dominant and non-dominant extremities including nine muscle groups involved in the kinetic chain of main tennis strokes. Significant differences (p≤0.05) and small-to-moderate effect sizes for greater stiffness and tone were found for the dominant biceps femoris (-11.1% and -5.6%; ES=0.53 and 0.54) and the non-dominant vastus medialis (5.4% and 3.2%; ES=-0.33 and -0.41), while greater tone was present in the non-dominant pectoralis major (4.0%; ES=-0.56). Time to relaxation was increased in the dominant biceps femoris (10.3%; ES=-0.58), the non-dominant pectoralis major (5.1%; ES=-0.56) and the gastrocnemius (9.1%; ES=-0.5). The non-dominant infraspinatus and dominant rectus abdominis showed greater elasticity than contralateral muscles (9.9% and -8.0%; ES=-0.58 and 0.6, respectively). These results reflect the existence of small-to-moderate differences when comparing side-to-side values of contractile characteristics in a small amount of the muscle groups tested. However, passive measurements of a relaxed muscle do not seem to fully reflect possible adaptation and changes derived from gameplay in young tennis players.
本研究的目的是调查年轻网球运动员肌肉特征的左右差异和不对称性。34名参与者对优势和非优势肢体进行了收缩特性测量(刚度、张力、弹性和放松时间),测量的肌肉群包括参与主要网球击球动作动力链的9个肌肉群。研究发现,优势股二头肌的刚度和张力显著更高(分别为-11.1%和-5.6%;效应量ES=0.53和0.54),非优势股内侧肌的刚度和张力也显著更高(分别为5.4%和3.2%;效应量ES=-0.33和-0.41),而非优势胸大肌的张力更高(4.0%;效应量ES=-0.56)。优势股二头肌(10.3%;效应量ES=-0.58)、非优势胸大肌(5.1%;效应量ES=-0.56)和腓肠肌(9.1%;效应量ES=-0.5)的放松时间增加。非优势冈下肌和优势腹直肌的弹性比其对侧肌肉更大(分别为9.9%和-8.0%;效应量ES=-0.58和0.6)。这些结果反映出,在所测试的少量肌肉群中,收缩特性的左右值比较时存在小到中等程度的差异。然而,对放松肌肉的被动测量似乎并不能完全反映年轻网球运动员因比赛而产生的可能的适应性和变化。