• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际羞辱的国内影响:来自气候变化和人权的证据

The Domestic Impact of International Shaming: Evidence from Climate Change and Human Rights.

作者信息

Koliev Faradj, Page Douglas, Tallberg Jonas

机构信息

Faradj Koliev is a researcher in the Department of Political Science at Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Douglas Page is an assistant professor in the Department of Political Science at Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, PA, USA.

出版信息

Public Opin Q. 2022 Aug 12;86(3):748-761. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfac026. eCollection 2022 Fall.

DOI:10.1093/poq/nfac026
PMID:36196433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9521198/
Abstract

Do international shaming efforts affect citizens' support for government policies? While it is a frequent claim in the literature that shaming works through domestic politics, we know little about how and when international criticism affects domestic public opinion. We address this question through an originally designed survey experiment in Sweden, which (i) compares the effects of international shaming in two issue areas-human rights and climate change, and (ii) tests whether government responses to criticism moderate the impact of shaming. Our main findings are fourfold. First, we find substantial effects of international shaming on domestic public opinion. These effects hold across both issue areas and irrespective of whether citizens support government parties or not. Second, human rights shaming has a stronger impact on citizens' support for government policies than climate shaming. Third, shaming is most effective among citizens who are more supportive of climate action, human rights, and international cooperation. Finally, our findings are mixed with respect to the effect of government responses. While government responses do not moderate the effects of human rights shaming, they seem to mitigate the effects of climate shaming.

摘要

国际羞辱行动会影响公民对政府政策的支持吗?虽然文献中经常声称羞辱是通过国内政治起作用的,但我们对国际批评如何以及何时影响国内公众舆论知之甚少。我们通过在瑞典进行的一项原创性调查实验来解决这个问题,该实验(i)比较了在人权和气候变化这两个议题领域国际羞辱的效果,以及(ii)测试政府对批评的回应是否会缓和羞辱的影响。我们的主要发现有四点。第一,我们发现国际羞辱对国内公众舆论有重大影响。这些影响在两个议题领域都存在,且不论公民是否支持政府政党。第二,人权羞辱对公民对政府政策的支持的影响比气候羞辱更强。第三,羞辱在那些更支持气候行动、人权和国际合作的公民中最有效。最后,关于政府回应的效果,我们的发现喜忧参半。虽然政府回应并没有缓和人权羞辱的影响,但它们似乎减轻了气候羞辱的影响。

相似文献

1
The Domestic Impact of International Shaming: Evidence from Climate Change and Human Rights.国际羞辱的国内影响:来自气候变化和人权的证据
Public Opin Q. 2022 Aug 12;86(3):748-761. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfac026. eCollection 2022 Fall.
2
Naming and shaming as a strategy for enforcing the Paris Agreement: The role of political institutions and public concern.点名羞辱作为执行《巴黎协定》的策略:政治机构和公众关注的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 3;120(40):e2305075120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305075120. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
3
On Effectiveness and Legitimacy of 'Shaming' as a Strategy for Combatting Climate Change.论“羞耻感”作为应对气候变化策略的有效性和合法性。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Oct;23(5):1289-1306. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9909-z. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
4
Liberté, Égalité, Crédibilité: An experimental study of citizens' perceptions of government responses to COVID-19 in eight countries.自由、平等、可信度:关于八个国家公民对政府应对新冠疫情反应认知的一项实验研究
Public Adm Rev. 2023 Jan 5. doi: 10.1111/puar.13588.
5
Integrating Youth Perspectives: Adopting a Human Rights and Public Health Approach to Climate Action.融入青年视角:采取人权和公共卫生方法应对气候行动。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 15;19(8):4840. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084840.
6
"Co-construction" in deliberative democracy: lessons from the French Citizens' Convention for Climate.协商民主中的“共建”:法国气候公民大会的经验教训
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):207. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01212-6. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
7
A research roadmap for complementary and alternative medicine - what we need to know by 2020.补充和替代医学研究路线图——到2020年我们需要了解的内容。
Forsch Komplementmed. 2014;21(2):e1-16. doi: 10.1159/000360744. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
8
Problems, policy and politics - perspectives of public health leaders on food insecurity and human rights in Australia.问题、政策与政治——澳大利亚公共卫生领导人对粮食不安全与人权的看法
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 12;21(1):1132. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11188-8.
9
Politicians' high-status signals make less-educated citizens more supportive of aggression against government: A video-vignette survey experiment.政客的高地位信号使受教育程度较低的公民更支持对政府的侵略:一项视频短片调查实验。
Br J Sociol. 2024 Sep;75(4):500-518. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13099. Epub 2024 May 10.
10
How issue frames shape beliefs about the importance of climate change policy across ideological and partisan groups.议题框架如何塑造不同意识形态和党派群体对气候变化政策重要性的看法。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181401. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Naming and shaming as a strategy for enforcing the Paris Agreement: The role of political institutions and public concern.点名羞辱作为执行《巴黎协定》的策略:政治机构和公众关注的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 3;120(40):e2305075120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305075120. Epub 2023 Sep 25.