• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我采集的联合拭子和唾液用于2019冠状病毒病诊断的诊断性能、稳定性和可用性:一项病例对照研究

Diagnostic Performance, Stability, and Usability of Self-Collected Combo Swabs and Saliva for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Diagnosis: A Case-Control Study.

作者信息

Choi Seong Jin, Jung Jongtak, Kim Eu Suk, Kim Hong Bin, Park Jeong Su, Park Kyoung Un, Lee Hyunju, Lee Eunyoung, Choe Pyoeng Gyun, Kim Ji-Yeon, Lee Eun Joo, Song Kyoung-Ho

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Infect Chemother. 2022 Sep;54(3):517-528. doi: 10.3947/ic.2022.0081.

DOI:10.3947/ic.2022.0081
PMID:36196610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9533156/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-sampling procedures to detect severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is important for patients who have difficulty visiting the hospital and may decrease the burden for health care workers (HCWs). The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance, stability and usability of self-collected nasal and oral combo swabs and saliva specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a case-control study with 50 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and 50 healthy volunteers from March, 2021 to June, 2021. We performed real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction to compare the diagnostic performance of self-collected specimens using positive percent agreements (PPAs).

RESULTS

The PPAs between self-collected and HCW-collected specimens were 77.3 - 81.0% and 80.5 -86.7% for the combo swabs and saliva specimens, respectively. The PPAs increased to 88.9 - 89.2% and 81.2 - 82.1% with a cycle threshold value ≤30.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of self sampling was comparable to that of HCW sampling in patients with high viral loads and may thus assist in the early diagnosis of COVID-19.

摘要

背景

对于就医困难的患者而言,检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的自我采样程序很重要,并且可能减轻医护人员的负担。本研究的目的是评估自我采集的鼻拭子和口拭子组合样本以及唾液样本的诊断性能、稳定性和可用性。

材料与方法

我们在2021年3月至2021年6月期间对50例2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者和50名健康志愿者进行了一项病例对照研究。我们进行了实时逆转录聚合酶链反应,以使用阳性百分比一致性(PPA)比较自我采集样本的诊断性能。

结果

对于鼻拭子和口拭子组合样本以及唾液样本,自我采集样本与医护人员采集样本之间的PPA分别为77.3 - 81.0%和80.5 - 86.7%。当循环阈值≤30时,PPA分别提高到88.9 - 89.2%和81.2 - 82.1%。

结论

在病毒载量高的患者中,自我采样的诊断性能与医护人员采样相当,因此可能有助于COVID-19的早期诊断。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b323/9533156/9032f19a5ad8/ic-54-517-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b323/9533156/96e1ec2dab2a/ic-54-517-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b323/9533156/dba24acbec1c/ic-54-517-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b323/9533156/9032f19a5ad8/ic-54-517-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b323/9533156/96e1ec2dab2a/ic-54-517-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b323/9533156/dba24acbec1c/ic-54-517-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b323/9533156/9032f19a5ad8/ic-54-517-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Performance, Stability, and Usability of Self-Collected Combo Swabs and Saliva for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Diagnosis: A Case-Control Study.自我采集的联合拭子和唾液用于2019冠状病毒病诊断的诊断性能、稳定性和可用性:一项病例对照研究
Infect Chemother. 2022 Sep;54(3):517-528. doi: 10.3947/ic.2022.0081.
2
Performance Analysis of Self-Collected Nasal and Oral Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.自我采集鼻拭子和咽拭子用于检测新型冠状病毒2的性能分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Sep 21;12(10):2279. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102279.
3
Diagnostic Performance of Self-Collected Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swab for the Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the Clinical Setting.临床环境中,自我采集唾液与鼻咽拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的诊断性能比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0046821. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00468-21. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
4
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) on Self-Collected Nasal Swab Compared With Professionally Collected Nasopharyngeal Swab.与专业采集的鼻咽拭子相比,通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测自我采集的鼻拭子中的SARS-CoV-2 RNA。
Cureus. 2022 Jun 3;14(6):e25618. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25618. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Buccal swabs as non-invasive specimens for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2.颊拭子作为非侵入性标本用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型。
J Int Med Res. 2021 May;49(5):3000605211016996. doi: 10.1177/03000605211016996.
6
Self-Collected Oral Fluid and Nasal Swabs Demonstrate Comparable Sensitivity to Clinician Collected Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Detection.自我采集的口腔液和鼻腔拭子与临床医生采集的鼻咽拭子在检测 2019 年冠状病毒病方面具有相当的敏感性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 2;73(9):e3106-e3109. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1589.
7
Validation of self-collected buccal swab and saliva as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19.验证自我采集的口腔拭子和唾液作为 COVID-19 的诊断工具。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;104:255-261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.080. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
8
Comparison of saliva with healthcare workers- and patient-collected swabs in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in a large cohort.比较唾液样本与医护人员和患者采集拭子在大型队列中 COVID-19 诊断中的应用。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 5;21(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06343-w.
9
Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 on Self-Collected Saliva or Anterior Nasal Specimens Compared With Healthcare Personnel-Collected Nasopharyngeal Specimens.与医护人员采集的鼻咽标本相比,自我采集的唾液或前鼻标本中严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的检测。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(Suppl 1):S65-S73. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab330.
10
Self-Collected versus Healthcare Worker-Collected Swabs in the Diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.自我采集与医护人员采集的拭子在严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2诊断中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Sep 9;10(9):678. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10090678.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-swabbing versus assisted swabbing for viral detection by qRT-PCR: the experience from SARS-CoV-2 based on a meta-analysis of six prospectively designed evaluations conducted in a UK setting.自我采样与辅助采样用于 qRT-PCR 检测病毒:基于在英国进行的六项前瞻性设计评估的荟萃分析,针对 SARS-CoV-2 的经验。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Aug;43(8):1621-1630. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04866-z. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

本文引用的文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection is associated with high nasopharyngeal viral load.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型奥密克戎变异株感染与鼻咽部病毒载量高有关。
J Infect. 2022 Jun;84(6):834-872. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.02.025. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
2
Viral Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Variants in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Persons.接种疫苗和未接种疫苗人群中新冠病毒变异株的病毒动力学
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 23;385(26):2489-2491. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2102507. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
3
Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant: a new chapter in the COVID-19 pandemic.奥密克戎新冠病毒变体:新冠疫情的新篇章。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 11;398(10317):2126-2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02758-6. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
4
Transmission Dynamics of the Delta Variant of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in South Korea.韩国 SARS-CoV-2 感染的德尔塔变异株传播动态。
J Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 2;225(5):793-799. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab586.
5
Community transmission and viral load kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) variant in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the UK: a prospective, longitudinal, cohort study.英国未接种和接种疫苗人群中 SARS-CoV-2 德尔塔(B.1.617.2)变异株的社区传播和病毒载量动力学:一项前瞻性、纵向、队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;22(2):183-195. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00648-4. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
6
The Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant has a higher viral load than the Beta and the historical variants in nasopharyngeal samples from newly diagnosed COVID-19 patients.在新诊断的新冠患者的鼻咽样本中,新冠病毒德尔塔变异株的病毒载量高于贝塔变异株和既往变异株。
J Infect. 2021 Oct;83(4):e1-e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.08.027. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
7
Performance of Unobserved Self-Collected Nasal Swabs for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR Utilizing a Remote Specimen Collection Strategy.采用远程样本采集策略,通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)时,未观察到的自我采集鼻拭子的性能。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 28;8(4):ofab039. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab039. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同采样方法在 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测中的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1233-1245. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00146-8. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
9
Self-Collected Oral Fluid Saliva Is Insensitive Compared With Nasal-Oropharyngeal Swabs in the Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Outpatients.在门诊患者中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2时,与鼻-口咽拭子相比,自行采集的口腔唾液样本不够敏感。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Dec 30;8(2):ofaa648. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa648. eCollection 2021 Feb.
10
Modeling SARS-CoV-2 viral kinetics and association with mortality in hospitalized patients from the French COVID cohort.对法国新冠队列中住院患者的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒动力学建模及其与死亡率的关联
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017962118.