Sultan Sadia, Baig Mohammad Amjad, Irfan Syed Mohammed, Ahmed Syed Ijlal, Hasan Syeda Faiza
Department of Hematology and Blood Bank, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Liaquat National Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Oman Med J. 2016 Mar;31(2):124-8. doi: 10.5001/omj.2016.24.
Fragmented blood transfusion services along with an unmotivated blood donation culture often leads to blood shortage. Donor retention is crucial to meet the increasing blood demand, and adverse donor reactions have a negative impact on donor return. The aim of this study was to estimate adverse donor reactions and identify any demographic association. .
We conducted a prospective study between January 2011 and December 2013. A total of 41,759 healthy donors were enrolled. Professionally trained donor attendants drew blood and all donors were observed during and following donation for possible adverse events for 20 minutes. Blood donors were asked to report if they suffered from any delayed adverse consequences. .
Out of 41,759 blood donors, 537 (1.3%) experienced adverse reactions. The incidence was one in every 78 donations. The mean age of donors who experienced adverse events was 26.0±6.8 years, and all were male. Out of 537 donors, 429 (80%) developed vasovagal reaction (VVR), 133 (25%) had nausea, 63 (12%) fainted, 35 (6%) developed hyperventilation, 9 (2%) had delayed syncope, and 9 (2%) developed hematoma. Arterial prick, nerve injury, cardiac arrest, and seizures were not observed. Donors aged less than < 30 years and weighing < 70 kg were significantly associated with VVR, hyperventilation, and nausea (p < 0.005). Undergraduates and Urdu speaking donors also had a significant association with fainting and nausea, respectively (p < 0.05). .
The prevalence of adverse events was low at our tertiary center. A VVR was the predominant adverse reaction and was associated with age and weight. Our study highlights the importance of these parameters in the donation process. A well-trained and experienced phlebotomist and pre-evaluation counseling of blood donors could further minimize the adverse reactions.
输血服务碎片化以及无偿献血文化缺乏积极性常常导致血液短缺。留住献血者对于满足不断增长的血液需求至关重要,而献血者的不良反应会对其再次献血产生负面影响。本研究的目的是评估献血者的不良反应并确定其与人口统计学特征的关联。
我们在2011年1月至2013年12月期间进行了一项前瞻性研究。共招募了41759名健康献血者。由经过专业培训的献血服务人员采血,并在献血期间及献血后对所有献血者进行20分钟的观察,以发现可能的不良事件。询问献血者是否有任何延迟出现的不良后果。
在41759名献血者中,537名(1.3%)出现了不良反应。发生率为每78次献血中有1例。出现不良反应的献血者的平均年龄为26.0±6.8岁,且均为男性。在537名献血者中,429名(80%)发生了血管迷走神经反应(VVR),133名(25%)出现恶心,63名(12%)晕厥,35名(6%)出现过度换气,9名(2%)出现延迟性晕厥,9名(2%)出现血肿。未观察到动脉穿刺、神经损伤、心脏骤停和癫痫发作。年龄小于30岁且体重小于70千克的献血者与VVR、过度换气和恶心显著相关(p<0.005)。大学生和说乌尔都语的献血者分别与晕厥和恶心也有显著关联(p<0.05)。
在我们的三级医疗中心,不良事件的发生率较低。VVR是主要的不良反应,且与年龄和体重有关。我们的研究强调了这些参数在献血过程中的重要性。训练有素且经验丰富的采血人员以及对献血者进行预先评估咨询可以进一步减少不良反应的发生。