Suppr超能文献

槟城医院全血捐献者的血管迷走神经反应。一项统计流行病学研究。

Vasovagal reaction among whole blood donors in Hospital Pulau Pinang. A statistical-epidemiological study.

作者信息

Hasan Ilyas, Arshad Anizah, Rahim Norhaza Abdul, Soo Peng Yen

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Penang General Hospital, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

出版信息

Asian J Transfus Sci. 2020 Jan-Jun;14(1):28-32. doi: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_111_17. Epub 2020 Jul 24.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Whole blood donation is generally considered a safe procedure; however, a small percentage of donors could develop vasovagal reactions (VVRs) during or after completion of blood donation.

AIMS

This study was undertaken to establish the prevalence of VVR among whole blood donors in Hospital Pulau Pinang and to investigate factors that lead to its occurrence.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 27,890 whole blood donations in 2016.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

For each donation, donor's demographic and blood donation-related information was extracted from the blood bank database.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Qualitative data including age group, sex, race, frequency, and location of donation were analyzed using Chi-square tests, while blood pressure was analyzed using -test.

RESULTS

Overall, 425 cases of VVRs were reported, resulting in a VVR rate of 1.5% (one event in every 65 donations). We found a statistically significant association ( < 0.05) between the occurrence of VVRs with the young age group, female gender, Indian race, first-time donor, lower predonation blood pressure, and donation performed in a mobile donation campaign. The most common vasovagal symptoms are lightheadedness (88%), followed by nausea (5.4%), muscle twitching (3.5%), vomiting (1.4%), loss of consciousness <30 s (1.4%), and paresthesia (0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of VVRs among whole blood donors in Hospital Pulau Pinang appeared to be low. Our study reaffirms that blood donation is a relatively safe process, and the incidence of VVR can be further reduced by ensuring strict screening procedure before blood donation.

摘要

背景

全血捐献通常被认为是一种安全的程序;然而,一小部分献血者在献血过程中或献血完成后可能会出现血管迷走神经反应(VVRs)。

目的

本研究旨在确定槟城医院全血献血者中VVRs的患病率,并调查导致其发生的因素。

设置与设计

进行了一项横断面研究,涉及2016年的27890次全血捐献。

研究对象与方法

对于每次捐献,从血库数据库中提取献血者的人口统计学和献血相关信息。

所用统计分析方法

使用卡方检验分析包括年龄组、性别、种族、献血频率和地点在内的定性数据,而血压则使用t检验进行分析。

结果

总体而言,报告了425例VVRs病例,VVR率为1.5%(每65次捐献中有1例)。我们发现VVRs的发生与年轻年龄组、女性、印度种族、首次献血者、献血前血压较低以及在流动献血活动中进行的献血之间存在统计学显著关联(P<0.05)。最常见的血管迷走神经症状是头晕(88%),其次是恶心(5.4%)、肌肉抽搐(3.5%)、呕吐(1.4%)、意识丧失<30秒(1.4%)和感觉异常(0.2%)。

结论

槟城医院全血献血者中VVRs的患病率似乎较低。我们的研究重申,献血是一个相对安全的过程,通过确保献血前严格的筛查程序,可以进一步降低VVR的发生率。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验