Suppr超能文献

股骨颈系统(FNS)的使用在成人股骨颈骨折的手术治疗中比空心螺钉固定效果更好:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The use of the femoral neck system (FNS) leads to better outcomes in the surgical management of femoral neck fractures in adults compared to fixation with cannulated screws: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Jul;33(5):2101-2109. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03407-8. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracapsular femoral neck fractures are challenging to treat, with outcomes depending on the quality of reduction, and the stability of fixation. Cannulated cancellous screws (CCS) are the most commonly used implants to fix these fractures, but failure rates are significant. The recently introduced femoral neck system (FNS) may be a better option than CCS fixation and this review attempts to compare the results.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched for eligible articles that had comparative data on the outcomes of fixation of adult femoral neck fractures with FNS and CCS. Data on various outcome parameters were collected. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Eight studies with 509 cases having a mean age of 50.8 years were included for final analysis. FNS was found to be associated with significantly reduced complication rates (p < 0.001), decreased incidence of postoperative femoral neck shortening (p < 0.001), quicker time to fracture union (p = 0.002), and better functional outcome scores (p < 0.001) compared to cannulated screws. FNS was also associated with a shorter operating time (mean difference 6.65 min) although not statistically significant (p = 0.24). CCS group had significantly reduced mean blood loss (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The available literature supports FNS as a better option for adult femoral neck fractures, with a lower complication rate, quicker union, and better clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

摘要

背景

囊内股骨颈骨折的治疗具有挑战性,其结果取决于复位质量和固定的稳定性。空心加压螺纹钉(CCS)是固定这些骨折最常用的植入物,但失败率很高。最近推出的股骨颈系统(FNS)可能是比 CCS 固定更好的选择,本综述试图对其结果进行比较。

方法

四个电子数据库搜索了具有 FNS 和 CCS 固定成人股骨颈骨折结果比较数据的合格文章。收集了各种结果参数的数据。使用具有 95%置信区间的随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析。

结果

最终分析纳入了 8 项研究,共 509 例,平均年龄为 50.8 岁。与 CCS 相比,FNS 显著降低了并发症发生率(p<0.001)、术后股骨颈缩短发生率(p<0.001)、骨折愈合时间更快(p=0.002)和功能结果评分更好(p<0.001)。与空心螺钉相比,FNS 还与较短的手术时间相关(平均差异 6.65 分钟),尽管无统计学意义(p=0.24)。CCS 组的平均失血量明显减少(p<0.001)。

结论

现有文献支持 FNS 是成人股骨颈骨折的更好选择,其并发症发生率更低、愈合更快、临床结果更好。

证据水平

3 级。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验