Lee Hwan-Hee, Chun You-Seung, Kim Weon-Yoo, Lim Young-Wook, Kim Seung-Chan
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 May 19;51(1):210. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02891-x.
The use of fixation and arthroplasty in treating elderly patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) remains controversial. The femoral neck system (FNS) is known to have relatively stronger axial and rotational stability compared with cancellous screw fixation. This study aimed to evaluate how effective internal fixation using a FNS is for non-displaced FNF in elderly patients.
All patients with nondisplaced (Garden I and II) FNF between July 2019 and November 2023 were eligible for osteosynthesis surgery at three institutions. Ninety-five patients (50 under 75 years of age and 45 over 75 years of age) who were treated with FNS with a follow-up period of more than 1 year were included. Clinical data (age, sex, direction, body mass index, injury mechanism, bone mineral density (BMD), and time to operation) were extracted from patient records. Institutional imaging software was used for radiographic analysis to evaluate surgical site complications at 1 year. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for reoperation.
The mean age of the younger group was 61.0 years, whereas that of the elderly group was 81.2 years. No significant differences were observed between the two groups except for BMD and time to operation. Three reoperations were observed in the younger group (6%), and four cases were observed in the elderly group (8.9%) (p = 0.894), and no significant difference in other surgical complications was observed between the two groups. BMD was identified as an independent risk factor for reoperation.
FNS may be used as an alternative to elderly and younger patients with nondisplaced FNFs. However, the reoperation rate may increase in severe osteoporosis patients with very low hip BMD.
在老年无移位股骨颈骨折(FNF)患者的治疗中,固定术和关节成形术的应用仍存在争议。与松质骨螺钉固定相比,股骨颈系统(FNS)已知具有相对更强的轴向和旋转稳定性。本研究旨在评估使用FNS进行内固定治疗老年患者无移位FNF的有效性。
2019年7月至2023年11月期间所有无移位(Garden I和II型)FNF患者均有资格在三家机构接受骨接合术。纳入95例接受FNS治疗且随访时间超过1年的患者(50例年龄在75岁以下,45例年龄在75岁以上)。从患者记录中提取临床数据(年龄、性别、骨折方向、体重指数、损伤机制、骨密度(BMD)和手术时间)。使用机构成像软件进行影像学分析,以评估1年时的手术部位并发症。进行多因素逻辑回归分析以确定再次手术的独立危险因素。
较年轻组的平均年龄为61.0岁,而老年组为81.2岁。除BMD和手术时间外,两组之间未观察到显著差异。较年轻组观察到3例再次手术(6%),老年组观察到4例(8.9%)(p = 0.894),两组之间在其他手术并发症方面未观察到显著差异。BMD被确定为再次手术的独立危险因素。
FNS可作为老年和年轻无移位FNF患者的一种替代治疗方法。然而,髋部BMD极低的严重骨质疏松患者的再次手术率可能会增加。