Department of Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Radiology, KAHER'S KLE Vishwanath Katti Institute of Dental Sciences, JNMC Campus, Nehru Nagar, Karnataka, 590010, Belagavi, India.
Department of Oral Medicine, Radiology and Special Care Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), 162, Poonamallee High Road, Chennai, 600077, India.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2023 Sep;19(3):409-439. doi: 10.1007/s12024-022-00520-2. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
This systematic review aims to determine whether linear or morphometric analysis of paranasal sinuses can be used for accurate determination of gender and to appraise which sinus can be evaluated for accurate gender determination.A comprehensive search of the specialized databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Clinical Key, ProQuest, Google Scholar, Epistomonikos, LILACS, OpenGrey) and other institutional repositories was performed for including the studies which assessed paranasal sinuses for gender determination. Quality assessment was carried out with the AQUA tool. The meta-analysis was performed with the eligible study data at 95% CI and p ≤ 0.05 in the random-effects model.Forty-six studies evaluating frontal sinus (13), maxillary sinus (26), frontal and maxillary sinus (5), or three paranasal sinuses (2) were included. All the included studies assessed height, length, width, and volume, respectively, and other additional parameters (area, perimeter) if wherever applicable. Frontal sinus had significantly higher values for males compared to females except for left height (LH) and left volume (LV). Maxillary sinus measurements were significantly higher in males contrasted to females except for LH. Sub-group analyses revealed that analyses involving the population had statistically significant results for all the measured parameters for both the sinuses (p < 0.05 and p = 0.00, respectively).Measurements obtained from assessing sinuses reveal that there are variations in size, among populations in different geographic regions. Hence, more studies with improved sample sizes and standardized measurement protocols should be carried out on different populations to see the diversity and their reliability.
本系统评价旨在确定线性或形态分析是否可用于准确确定性别,并评估可用于准确确定性别的鼻窦。通过对专门数据库(PubMed/MEDLINE、Science Direct、Clinical Key、ProQuest、Google Scholar、Epistomonikos、LILACS、OpenGrey)和其他机构知识库进行全面搜索,纳入了评估鼻窦性别鉴定的研究。使用 AQUA 工具进行质量评估。对合格研究数据进行荟萃分析,置信区间为 95%,随机效应模型 p≤0.05。
共纳入 46 项评估额窦(13 项)、上颌窦(26 项)、额窦和上颌窦(5 项)或三个鼻窦(2 项)的研究。所有纳入的研究分别评估了高度、长度、宽度和体积,以及其他适用的附加参数(面积、周长)。与女性相比,男性的额窦值明显更高,除了左侧高度(LH)和左侧体积(LV)。与女性相比,男性的上颌窦测量值明显更高,除了 LH。亚组分析显示,涉及人群的分析对于两个鼻窦的所有测量参数均具有统计学意义(p<0.05 和 p=0.00,分别)。
从评估鼻窦获得的测量值表明,在不同地理区域的不同人群中,鼻窦的大小存在差异。因此,应该在不同人群中进行更多具有更大样本量和标准化测量方案的研究,以了解其多样性和可靠性。