Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Michael and Susan Dell Center for Healthy Living, UTHealth Science Center at Houston, Austin Campus, Austin, TX, USA.
Child Obes. 2023 Oct;19(7):470-478. doi: 10.1089/chi.2022.0084. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
It is essential to quantify the accuracy and precision of bioelectrical impedance (BIA)-estimated percent body fat (%BF) to better interpret community-based research findings that utilize opportunistic measures. Study 1 measured the accuracy of a new dual-frequency foot-to-foot BIA device (Tanita DC-430U) compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) among healthy elementary school-aged children ( = 50). Study 2 examined the precision of BIA %BF estimates within and between days among children and adults ( = 38). Regarding accuracy, Tanita DC-430U underestimated %BF by 8.0 percentage points compared with DXA (20.6% vs. 28.5%), but correctly ranked children in terms of %BF. Differences in %BF between BIA and DXA were driven by lower BIA-estimated fat mass (7.8 kg vs. 9.9 kg, < 0.05) and higher BIA-estimated fat-free mass (25.3 kg vs. 24.1 kg, < 0.05). The absolute agreement between BIA and DXA for estimated %BF was moderate (concordance correlation coefficients = 0.53). Regarding precision, measures taken at the same time, but on different days (root mean square standard deviation [RMSD] = 0.42-0.74) were more precise than the measures taken at different times within a single day (RMSD = 1.04-1.10). The Tanita DC-430U substantially underestimated %BF compared with DXA, highlighting the need to assess accuracy of new BIA devices when they are introduced to the market. Opportunistic measures of %BF estimates were most precise when taken at consistent times and in the morning, but may be utilized throughout the day with an understanding of within- and between-day variability.
定量评估生物电阻抗(BIA)估计的体脂肪百分比(%BF)的准确性和精密度对于更好地解释基于社区的研究结果至关重要,这些研究结果利用了机会性测量方法。研究 1 测量了一种新的双频足底-足底 BIA 设备(Tanita DC-430U)与健康小学生(n=50)之间双能 X 射线吸收法(DXA)相比的准确性。研究 2 检查了儿童和成人 BIA %BF 估计值在日内和日间的精密度(n=38)。在准确性方面,与 DXA 相比,Tanita DC-430U 低估了 8.0 个百分点的 %BF(20.6%对 28.5%),但正确地按 %BF 对儿童进行了排名。BIA 和 DXA 之间 %BF 的差异是由 BIA 估计的脂肪量较低(7.8kg 对 9.9kg,<0.05)和 BIA 估计的去脂体重较高(25.3kg 对 24.1kg,<0.05)所致。BIA 和 DXA 之间估计的 %BF 的绝对一致性是中等的(一致性相关系数=0.53)。在精密度方面,在同一时间但在不同天进行的测量(均方根标准偏差 [RMSD] = 0.42-0.74)比在一天内不同时间进行的测量更精确(RMSD = 1.04-1.10)。与 DXA 相比,Tanita DC-430U 大大低估了 %BF,这突出表明在新的 BIA 设备推向市场时,需要评估其准确性。在一致的时间和早上进行 %BF 估计的机会性测量最精确,但如果了解日内和日间的可变性,也可以在一天中的任何时间使用。