Lee Li-Wen, Liao Yu-San, Lu Hsueh-Kuan, Hsiao Pei-Lin, Chen Yu-Yawn, Chi Ching-Chi, Hsieh Kuen-Chang
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi Campus, Chiayi, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 3;12(2):e0171568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171568. eCollection 2017.
Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a convenient and child-friendly method for longitudinal analysis of changes in body composition. However, most validation studies of BIA have been performed on adult Caucasians. The present cross-sectional study investigated the validity of two portable BIA devices, the Inbody 230 (BIA8MF) and the Tanita BC-418 (BIA8SF), in healthy Taiwanese children.
Children aged 7-12 years (72 boys and 78 girls) were recruited. Body composition was measured by the BIA8SF and the BIA8MF. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was used as the reference method.
There were strong linear correlations in body composition measurements between the BIA8SF and DXA and between the BIA8MF and DXA. Both BIAs underestimated fat mass (FM) and percentage body fat (%BF) relative to DXA in both genders The degree of agreement in lean body mass (LBM), FM, and %BF estimates was higher between BIA8MF and DXA than between BIA8SF and DXA. The Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) for LBM8MF met the criteria of substantial to perfect agreement whereas the ρc for FM8MF met the criteria of fair to substantial agreement. Bland-Altman analysis showed a clinically acceptable agreement between LBM measures by BIA8MF and DXA. The limit of agreement in %BF estimation by BIA and DXA were wide and the errors were clinically important. For the estimation of ALM, BIA8SF and BIA8MF both provided poor accuracy.
For all children, LBM measures were precise and accurate using the BIA8MF whereas clinically significant errors occurred in FM and %BF estimates. Both BIAs underestimated FM and %BF in children. Thus, the body composition results obtained using the inbuilt equations of the BIA8SF and BIA8MF should be interpreted with caution, and high quality validation studies for specific subgroups of children are required prior to field research.
生物电阻抗分析(BIA)是一种方便且对儿童友好的用于纵向分析身体成分变化的方法。然而,大多数BIA的验证研究是在成年白种人身上进行的。本横断面研究调查了两种便携式BIA设备,Inbody 230(BIA8MF)和Tanita BC - 418(BIA8SF)在健康台湾儿童中的有效性。
招募了7至12岁的儿童(72名男孩和78名女孩)。通过BIA8SF和BIA8MF测量身体成分。双能X线吸收法(DXA)用作参考方法。
BIA8SF与DXA之间以及BIA8MF与DXA之间的身体成分测量存在强线性相关性。两种BIA方法相对于DXA均低估了男女的脂肪量(FM)和体脂百分比(%BF)。BIA8MF与DXA之间在瘦体重(LBM)、FM和%BF估计值的一致性程度高于BIA8SF与DXA之间。LBM8MF的林氏一致性相关系数(ρc)符合从实质一致到完全一致的标准,而FM8MF的ρc符合从一般一致到实质一致的标准。Bland - Altman分析显示BIA8MF和DXA测量的LBM之间具有临床可接受的一致性。BIA和DXA估计%BF的一致性界限较宽,误差在临床上具有重要意义。对于去脂体重(ALM)的估计,BIA8SF和BIA8MF的准确性均较差。
对于所有儿童,使用BIA8MF测量LBM精确且准确,而在FM和%BF估计中出现了具有临床意义的误差。两种BIA方法均低估了儿童的FM和%BF。因此,使用BIA8SF和BIA8MF内置方程获得的身体成分结果应谨慎解释,并且在进行现场研究之前需要针对特定儿童亚组进行高质量的验证研究。