Suppr超能文献

英国医院进行的异恶酰抗炎药与萘普生的双盲多中心研究。

Double-blind multicentre UK hospital studies of isoxicam vs naproxen.

作者信息

Cardoe N, Hart F D

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):167S-172S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1986.tb03000.x.

Abstract

1 Two multicentre, parallel group, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy comparison studies were conducted between isoxicam in the usual dose of 200 mg once daily and naproxen 500 mg twice daily. 2 The drugs were administered for 4 weeks to 230 patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee in the first trial and to 249 patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis in the second. 3 The studies compared treatments for both safety and overall effectiveness in the relief of pain. 4 In the osteoarthritis trial, overall pain was reduced by both drugs after 2 weeks of therapy but only isoxicam produced further improvement after 4 weeks. 5 Isoxicam produced reductions comparable to those produced by naproxen in pain on standing from the sitting position, pain on walking, and pain on movement of the affected joint, after 2 and 4 weeks. 6 After 4 weeks, isoxicam given once daily in the morning was significantly more effective than naproxen given in the morning and the evening in relieving not only total pain as assessed by a visual analogue scale but, as importantly, night pain. 7 Compared to naproxen therapy, isoxicam therapy was associated with significantly more patients whose disease state was improved at 2 weeks, as assessed by physicians. 8 In the rheumatoid arthritis trial, isoxicam was equally as effective as naproxen in reducing joint tenderness, joint swelling, and pain; at 4 weeks there was a trend in favour of isoxicam in reduction of joint swelling and pain. 9 Isoxicam reduced morning stiffness significantly more than naproxen after 4 weeks; this trend was apparent at 2 weeks.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要
  1. 开展了两项多中心、平行组、随机、双盲、双模拟对照研究,比较了每日一次服用常规剂量200毫克的异恶酰胺与每日两次服用500毫克萘普生的效果。2. 在第一项试验中,对230名髋部和/或膝部骨关节炎患者给药4周,第二项试验中对249名类风湿性关节炎患者给药4周。3. 这些研究比较了两种药物在缓解疼痛方面的安全性和总体有效性。4. 在骨关节炎试验中,两种药物在治疗2周后均使总体疼痛减轻,但只有异恶酰胺在4周后产生了进一步改善。5. 在2周和4周后,异恶酰胺在减轻从坐姿站立时的疼痛、行走时的疼痛以及患关节活动时的疼痛方面,产生了与萘普生相当的疼痛减轻效果。6. 4周后,每天早晨服用一次的异恶酰胺在缓解不仅通过视觉模拟量表评估的总体疼痛,而且同样重要的是夜间疼痛方面,比早晨和晚上服用的萘普生显著更有效。7. 与萘普生治疗相比,根据医生评估,在2周时疾病状态得到改善的患者中,接受异恶酰胺治疗的明显更多。8. 在类风湿性关节炎试验中,异恶酰胺在减轻关节压痛、关节肿胀和疼痛方面与萘普生同样有效;在4周时,在减轻关节肿胀和疼痛方面有倾向于异恶酰胺的趋势。9. 4周后,异恶酰胺比萘普生更显著地减轻晨僵;这种趋势在2周时就很明显。(摘要截选至250词)

相似文献

9
Isoxicam vs ketoprofen in ankylosing spondylitis.异恶酰草胺与酮洛芬治疗强直性脊柱炎的对比
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):157S-160S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1986.tb02998.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Isoxicam.异恶酰草胺
Clin Rheum Dis. 1984 Aug;10(2):385-99.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验