Suppr超能文献

全身利多卡因与右美托咪定对甲状腺癌手术后恢复质量和镇痛效果的影响:一项随机对照试验

Effects of Systemic Lidocaine Versus Dexmedetomidine on the Recovery Quality and Analgesia After Thyroid Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Shu Teng, Xu Siqi, Ju Xia, Hu Shenghong, Wang Shengbin, Ma Li

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Anqing Medical Center, Anhui Medical University, Anqing, China.

Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Anqing Medical Center, Anhui Medical University, Anqing, China.

出版信息

Pain Ther. 2022 Dec;11(4):1403-1414. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00442-5. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Surgical management is commonly used for thyroid cancer. We evaluated the effects of systemic lidocaine versus dexmedetomidine on the recovery quality and analgesia after thyroid cancer surgery.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with thyroid cancer were randomly allocated to group L (received lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg loading, continuously infused 1.5 mg/kg per hour), group D (received dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg/kg loading, continuously infused 0.5 µg/kg per hour) and group C (received normal saline), with 40 cases in each group. Anaesthesia induction and maintenance were performed using target-controlled infusions (TCIs) of propofol and remifentanil. The primary outcome of the quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) score was recorded on the day before surgery and postoperative day 1 (POD1). Secondary outcomes included the consumption of remifentanil during surgery, time to first required rescue analgesia, number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, postoperative cumulative consumption of tramadol, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, incidence of postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV) and side effects.

RESULTS

The total score of the QoR-15 at POD1 (median, IQR) was higher in group L (128.0, 122.0-132.8) and group D (127.5, 122.5-132.5) compared to group C (118.5, 113.0-123.5) (P = 0.000). Compared to group C, systemic lidocaine and dexmedetomidine reduced cumulative consumption of remifentanil and VAS pain score (P = 0.000). The time to first required rescue analgesia (mean, SD) was longer in group L (8.1 h, 1.2 h) and group D (8.5 h, 1.9 h) than group C (5.9 h, 0.9 h) (P = 0.000). The number of patients requiring rescue analgesia was lower in group L (8/40, 20%) and group D (6/40, 15%) than group C (16/40, 40%) (P = 0.029), and cumulative consumption of tramadol (mean, SD) was lower in group L (44.0 mg, 17.1 mg) and group D (51.7 mg, 14.1 mg) than group C (73.9 mg, 18.4 mg) (P = 0.000). The incidence of PONV in group L (7/40, 17.5%) and group D (9/40, 22.5%) was lower than group C (18/40, 45.0%) (P = 0.016). Bradycardia (heart rate  less than 50 beats/min or lower) was noted in 25 patients (25/40, 62.5%), which was reversed by intravenous administration of atropine 0.5 mg.

CONCLUSION

Systemic lidocaine and dexmedetomidine had similar effects on enhancing the quality of recovery, alleviating the intensity of pain and reducing the incidence of PONV after thyroid cancer surgery. However, dexmedetomidine may result in bradycardia. Therefore, lidocaine was superior to dexmedetomidine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR.org.cn (ChiCTR2000038442). Registered on September 22, 2020.

摘要

引言

手术治疗常用于甲状腺癌。我们评估了全身应用利多卡因与右美托咪定对甲状腺癌手术后恢复质量和镇痛效果的影响。

方法

总共120例甲状腺癌患者被随机分为L组(负荷剂量给予利多卡因1.5mg/kg,随后每小时持续输注1.5mg/kg)、D组(负荷剂量给予右美托咪定0.5μg/kg,随后每小时持续输注0.5μg/kg)和C组(给予生理盐水),每组40例。采用丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼靶控输注(TCI)进行麻醉诱导和维持。在手术前一天和术后第1天(POD1)记录恢复质量-15(QoR-15)评分这一主要结局指标。次要结局指标包括手术期间瑞芬太尼的用量、首次需要补救性镇痛的时间、需要补救性镇痛的患者数量、术后曲马多的累积用量、视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分、术后恶心或呕吐(PONV)的发生率以及副作用。

结果

与C组(118.5,113.0 - 123.5)相比,L组(128.0,122.0 - 132.8)和D组(127.5,122.5 - 132.5)在POD1时的QoR-15总分更高(P = 0.000)。与C组相比,全身应用利多卡因和右美托咪定减少了瑞芬太尼的累积用量和VAS疼痛评分(P = 0.000)。L组(8.1小时,1.2小时)和D组(8.5小时,1.9小时)首次需要补救性镇痛的时间比C组(5.9小时,0.9小时)更长(P = 0.000)。L组(8/40,20%)和D组(6/40,15%)需要补救性镇痛的患者数量低于C组(16/40,40%)(P = 0.029),L组(44.0mg,17.1mg)和D组(51.7mg,14.1mg)曲马多的累积用量低于C组(73.9mg,18.4mg)(P = 0.000)。L组(7/40,17.5%)和D组(9/40,22.5%)的PONV发生率低于C组(18/40,45.0%)(P = 0.016)。25例患者(25/40,62.5%)出现心动过缓(心率小于50次/分钟或更低),通过静脉注射0.5mg阿托品得以纠正。

结论

全身应用利多卡因和右美托咪定在提高甲状腺癌手术后的恢复质量、减轻疼痛强度和降低PONV发生率方面具有相似的效果。然而,右美托咪定可能导致心动过缓。因此,利多卡因优于右美托咪定。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR.org.cn)(ChiCTR2000038442)。于2020年9月22日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c63/9633913/4c61980912ae/40122_2022_442_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验