• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肯尼亚中学利用数字技术对健康进行批判性思考的情境化:一项定性分析。

Contextualizing critical thinking about health using digital technology in secondary schools in Kenya: a qualitative analysis.

作者信息

Chesire Faith, Ochieng Marlyn, Mugisha Michael, Ssenyonga Ronald, Oxman Matt, Nsangi Allen, Semakula Daniel, Nyirazinyoye Laetitia, Lewin Simon, Sewankambo Nelson K, Kaseje Margaret, Oxman Andrew D, Rosenbaum Sarah

机构信息

Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Tropical Institute of Community Health and Development, Kisumu, Kenya.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Oct 6;8(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01183-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-022-01183-0
PMID:36203201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9535840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Good health decisions depend on one's ability to think critically about health claims and make informed health choices. Young people can learn these skills through school-based interventions, but learning resources need to be low-cost and built around lessons that can fit into existing curricula. As a first step to developing and evaluating digital learning resources that are feasible to use in Kenyan secondary schools, we conducted a context analysis to explore interest in critical thinking for health, map where critical thinking about health best fits in the curriculum, explore conditions for introducing new learning resources, and describe the information and communication technology (ICT) infrastructure available for teaching and learning.

METHODS

We employed a qualitative descriptive approach. We interviewed 15 key informants, carried out two focus group discussions, observed ICT conditions in five secondary schools, reviewed seven documents, and conducted an online catalog of ICT infrastructure in all schools (n=250) in Kisumu County. Participants included national curriculum developers, national ICT officers, teachers, and national examiners. We used a framework analysis approach to analyze data and report findings.

FINDINGS

Although critical thinking is a core competence in the curriculum, critical thinking about health is not currently taught in Kenyan secondary schools. Teachers, health officials, and curriculum developers recognized the importance of teaching critical thinking about health in secondary schools. Stakeholders agreed that Informed Health Choices learning resources could be embedded in nine subjects. The National Institute of Curriculum Development regulates resources for learning; the development of new resources requires collaboration and approval from this body. Most schools do not use ICT for teaching, and for those few that do, the use is limited. Implementation of Kenya's ICT policy framework for schools faces several challenges which include inadequate ICT infrastructure, poor internet connectivity, and teachers' lack of training and experience.

CONCLUSION

Teaching critical thinking about health is possible within the current Kenyan lower secondary school curriculum, but the learning resources will need to be designed for inclusion in and across existing subjects. The National ICT Plan and Vision for 2030 provides an opportunity for scale-up and integration of technology in teaching and learning environments, which can enable future use of digital resources in schools. However, given the current ICT condition in schools in the country, digital learning resources should be designed to function with limited ICT infrastructure, unstable Internet access, and for use by teachers with low levels of experience using digital technology.

摘要

背景

良好的健康决策取决于个人对健康声明进行批判性思考并做出明智健康选择的能力。年轻人可以通过学校干预来学习这些技能,但学习资源需要低成本且围绕能够融入现有课程的课程内容来构建。作为开发和评估可在肯尼亚中学实际使用的数字学习资源的第一步,我们进行了一项背景分析,以探究对健康批判性思维的兴趣,确定健康批判性思维在课程中的最佳契合点,探索引入新学习资源的条件,并描述可用于教学的信息通信技术(ICT)基础设施。

方法

我们采用了定性描述方法。我们采访了15名关键信息提供者,进行了两次焦点小组讨论,观察了五所中学的ICT状况,查阅了七份文件,并编制了基苏木县所有学校(n = 250)的ICT基础设施在线目录。参与者包括国家课程开发者、国家ICT官员、教师和国家考官。我们使用框架分析方法来分析数据并报告研究结果。

结果

尽管批判性思维是课程中的一项核心能力,但肯尼亚中学目前并未教授健康方面的批判性思维。教师、卫生官员和课程开发者认识到在中学教授健康批判性思维的重要性。利益相关者一致认为,《明智的健康选择》学习资源可以融入九个学科。国家课程开发研究所负责规范学习资源;新资源的开发需要该机构的合作与批准。大多数学校不使用ICT进行教学,而少数使用的学校,其使用也很有限。肯尼亚学校ICT政策框架的实施面临若干挑战,包括ICT基础设施不足、互联网连接不佳以及教师缺乏培训和经验。

结论

在肯尼亚当前的初中课程中教授健康批判性思维是可行的,但学习资源需要设计成能够融入并贯穿现有学科。《2030年国家ICT计划与愿景》为在教学环境中扩大技术规模和整合提供了机会,这可以使未来学校能够使用数字资源。然而,鉴于该国学校目前的ICT状况,数字学习资源应设计为在有限的ICT基础设施、不稳定的互联网接入条件下运行,并供使用数字技术经验较少的教师使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f20b/9535840/34729c4a5c54/40814_2022_1183_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f20b/9535840/34729c4a5c54/40814_2022_1183_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f20b/9535840/34729c4a5c54/40814_2022_1183_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Contextualizing critical thinking about health using digital technology in secondary schools in Kenya: a qualitative analysis.肯尼亚中学利用数字技术对健康进行批判性思考的情境化:一项定性分析。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Oct 6;8(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01183-0.
2
Learning to think critically about health using digital technology in Ugandan lower secondary schools: A contextual analysis.利用数字技术在乌干达初中阶段培养学生对健康问题的批判性思维:背景分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0260367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260367. eCollection 2022.
3
Teaching critical thinking about health using digital technology in lower secondary schools in Rwanda: A qualitative context analysis.卢旺达初中利用数字技术开展健康批判性思维教学:一项质性情境分析
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 22;16(3):e0248773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248773. eCollection 2021.
4
Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources.在中学阶段教授有关健康信息和选择的批判性思维:数字资源的以人为中心的设计。
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 4;12:481. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.132580.3. eCollection 2023.
5
Feasibility of contextualizing the Informed Health Choices learning resources in Italy: A pilot study in a primary school in Florence.在意大利使知情健康选择学习资源本地化的可行性:佛罗伦萨一所小学的试点研究。
F1000Res. 2022 Oct 12;11:1167. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123728.1. eCollection 2022.
6
Teaching and learning how to make informed health choices: Protocol for a context analysis in Spanish primary schools.教授和学习如何做出明智的健康选择:西班牙小学中的情境分析方案。
F1000Res. 2021 Apr 22;10:312. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.51961.2. eCollection 2021.
7
Does the use of the Informed Healthcare Choices (IHC) primary school resources improve the ability of grade-5 children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of treatments: protocol for a cluster-randomised trial.使用《明智医疗选择》(IHC)小学资源是否能提高乌干达五年级儿童评估有关治疗效果说法的可信度的能力:一项整群随机试验方案
Trials. 2017 May 18;18(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1958-8.
8
Use of the informed health choices educational intervention to improve secondary students' ability to think critically about health interventions in Uganda: A cluster-randomized trial.在乌干达使用明智健康选择教育干预措施来提高中学生对健康干预措施进行批判性思考的能力:一项整群随机试验。
J Evid Based Med. 2023 Sep;16(3):285-293. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12553. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
9
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
10
Protocol for assessing stakeholder engagement in the development and evaluation of the Informed Health Choices resources teaching secondary school students to think critically about health claims and choices.评估利益相关者在制定和评估“知情健康选择”资源中的参与情况的方案,该资源旨在教导中学生批判性地思考健康声明和选择。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 12;15(10):e0239985. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239985. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
What is the effect of the Informed Health Choices secondary school intervention on the ability of students in Rwanda to think critically about health choices after one-year follow-up? A cluster-randomized trial.经过一年的随访,“明智健康选择”中学干预措施对卢旺达学生批判性思考健康选择能力的影响如何?一项整群随机试验。
Trials. 2025 May 15;26(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08779-w.
2
The effects of teaching strategies on learning to think critically in primary and secondary schools: an overview of systematic reviews.教学策略对中小学批判性思维培养的影响:系统综述概述
F1000Res. 2025 Apr 16;13:1426. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.158087.2. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Teaching critical thinking about health using digital technology in lower secondary schools in Rwanda: A qualitative context analysis.卢旺达初中利用数字技术开展健康批判性思维教学:一项质性情境分析
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 22;16(3):e0248773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248773. eCollection 2021.
2
Community pharmacist in public health emergencies: Quick to action against the coronavirus 2019-nCoV outbreak.社区药剂师在公共卫生突发事件中的作用:迅速应对 2019 年新型冠状病毒疫情。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Apr;16(4):583-586. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.003. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
Effects of the Informed Health Choices podcast on the ability of parents of primary school children in Uganda to assess the trustworthiness of claims about treatment effects: one-year follow up of a randomised trial.
Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study.
乌干达采用健康明智选择干预措施进行健康批判性思维教学的过程评估:一项混合方法研究
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Dec 20;12(6). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00484.
4
Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Kenya: A Mixed Methods Study.肯尼亚采用明智健康选择干预措施开展健康批判性思维教学的过程评估:一项混合方法研究
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Dec 20;12(6). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00485.
5
Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Rwanda: A Mixed Methods Study.在卢旺达使用明智健康选择干预措施开展健康批判性思维教学的过程评估:一项混合方法研究
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Dec 20;12(6). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00483.
6
Effects of the informed health choices secondary school intervention after 1 year: a prospective meta-analysis using individual participant data.知情健康选择中学干预 1 年后的效果:使用个体参与者数据的前瞻性荟萃分析。
Trials. 2024 Oct 30;25(1):733. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08577-w.
7
Teaching critical thinking about health information and choices in secondary schools: human-centred design of digital resources.在中学阶段教授有关健康信息和选择的批判性思维:数字资源的以人为中心的设计。
F1000Res. 2024 Sep 4;12:481. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.132580.3. eCollection 2023.
8
Key concepts for informed health choices: Where's the evidence?知情选择的关键概念:证据在哪里?
F1000Res. 2023 Nov 27;11:890. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123051.1. eCollection 2022.
9
Prioritisation of Informed Health Choices (IHC) key concepts to be included in lower secondary school resources: A consensus study.优先考虑将知情健康选择(IHC)关键概念纳入中学资源:一项共识研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 7;18(4):e0267422. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267422. eCollection 2023.
《知情健康选择播客对乌干达小学生家长评估治疗效果相关声明可信度能力的影响:一项随机试验的一年随访结果》
Trials. 2020 Feb 14;21(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4093-x.
4
Informed health choices intervention to teach primary school children in low-income countries to assess claims about treatment effects: process evaluation.知情健康选择干预措施,以教导低收入国家的小学生评估有关治疗效果的主张:过程评估。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 11;9(9):e030787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030787.
5
Key Concepts for assessing claims about treatment effects and making well-informed treatment choices.评估关于治疗效果的主张并做出明智治疗选择的关键概念。
F1000Res. 2018 Nov 12;7:1784. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16771.2. eCollection 2018.
6
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估——第 2 部分:如何对信心进行全面的 CERQual 评估并创建定性研究结果总结表。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0689-2.
7
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series.应用 GRADE-CERQual 对定性证据综合研究结果进行评估:简介系列。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3.
8
Key Concepts for Informed Health Choices: a framework for helping people learn how to assess treatment claims and make informed choices.知情健康决策的关键概念:帮助人们学习如何评估治疗主张并做出明智选择的框架。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018 Feb;23(1):29-33. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110829.
9
Effects of the Informed Health Choices primary school intervention on the ability of children in Uganda to assess the reliability of claims about treatment effects: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.知情健康选择小学干预对乌干达儿童评估治疗效果可靠性能力的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):374-388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31226-6. Epub 2017 May 22.
10
Measuring ability to assess claims about treatment effects: the development of the 'Claim Evaluation Tools'.衡量评估治疗效果相关声明的能力:“声明评估工具”的开发
BMJ Open. 2017 May 17;7(5):e013184. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013184.