• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与痴呆症患者及其照护者合作开展技术研究和设计:反思与建议。

Partnering with people living with dementia and care partners in technology research and design: Reflections and recommendations.

机构信息

The Florence Project, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Aust Occup Ther J. 2022 Dec;69(6):723-741. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12843. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

DOI:10.1111/1440-1630.12843
PMID:36203322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10092369/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Occupational therapists may recommend and support technology use for facilitating independence, safety, wellbeing, and participation. There are high expectations for technology for people living with dementia. However, there is recognition that technologies will need to improve to deliver these expected benefits. People living with dementia have historically been excluded from direct involvement in research and design. A program of participatory research was undertaken to codesign technologies and technology research with people living with dementia and care partners. This work aims to capture the requirements, actions, and barriers experienced in forming these partnerships in technology research and design.

METHODS

A shared metareflection of experiences was conducted by members (5) of the research teams involved in three participatory research and technology design studies. The team comprising living experience experts, an occupational therapist, and interaction designer reflected on their experiences and derived recommendations. Key considerations for effective partnerships were drawn inductively by the authors from study experiences, materials, and reflexive discussion.

FINDINGS

Six core areas were identified. These were four action areas-(1) Agree on the value; (2) The time to start partnering is now; (3) Ask not assume; and (4) Push back on 'we always have'-(5) barriers and tensions, and (6) unexpected benefits. The reflections indicated that genuine partnerships and engagements were possible with living experience experts in research and design teams. These required resourcing and focussed actions to promote partnership. Despite some structural changes that encourage partnering, there are considerable barriers to this engagement; however, benefits beyond the expected ones can be realised.

CONCLUSION

Genuine partnerships in technology research and design with living experience experts are possible and lead to benefits for the team, research outcomes, and technologies. Recommended actions could support expansion of effective partnerships with people living with dementia and care partners as well as other partnerships in research.

摘要

简介

职业治疗师可能会推荐并支持技术的使用,以促进独立性、安全性、幸福感和参与感。对于患有痴呆症的人来说,技术的应用寄予了很高的期望。然而,人们认识到技术需要改进,才能实现这些预期的效益。患有痴呆症的人在历史上一直被排除在直接参与研究和设计之外。我们开展了一项参与式研究计划,与患有痴呆症的患者及其护理伙伴共同设计技术和技术研究。这项工作旨在了解在技术研究和设计中形成这些伙伴关系的要求、行动和障碍。

方法

参与三项参与式研究和技术设计研究的研究团队的五名成员(5)共同进行了一次共享元反思。该团队由生活经验专家、一名职业治疗师和交互设计师组成,他们对自己的经验进行了反思,并提出了建议。作者从研究经验、材料和反思性讨论中归纳出有效伙伴关系的关键考虑因素。

结果

确定了六个核心领域。这些领域包括四个行动领域——(1)就价值达成一致;(2)现在就开始建立伙伴关系;(3)不要想当然地提问;(4)对“我们总是这样”提出质疑;(5)障碍和紧张局势;(6)意外的好处。反思表明,与研究和设计团队中的生活经验专家建立真正的伙伴关系是可能的,这需要资源和有针对性的行动来促进伙伴关系。尽管有一些鼓励合作的结构性变化,但这种合作仍存在相当大的障碍,但也可以实现超出预期的好处。

结论

与生活经验专家在技术研究和设计方面建立真正的伙伴关系是可能的,并能为团队、研究成果和技术带来好处。建议的行动可以支持与患有痴呆症的患者及其护理伙伴以及研究中的其他伙伴关系的有效伙伴关系的扩大。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6b8/10092369/ac376d9f6ac8/AOT-69-723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6b8/10092369/ac376d9f6ac8/AOT-69-723-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6b8/10092369/ac376d9f6ac8/AOT-69-723-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Partnering with people living with dementia and care partners in technology research and design: Reflections and recommendations.与痴呆症患者及其照护者合作开展技术研究和设计:反思与建议。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2022 Dec;69(6):723-741. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12843. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
2
Personal and complex: The needs and experiences related to technology use for people living with dementia.个人化且复杂:与痴呆症患者使用技术相关的需求和体验。
Dementia (London). 2022 Jul;21(5):1511-1531. doi: 10.1177/14713012221084521. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
3
Bridging gaps in the design and implementation of socially assistive technologies for dementia care: the role of occupational therapy.弥合用于痴呆症护理的社会辅助技术在设计与实施方面的差距:职业治疗的作用。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Apr;19(3):595-603. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2022.2111610. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
Creating a consumer-driven global community of practice to support action within environmental design with people living with dementia: assistive technology challenges and opportunities.创建一个以消费者为导向的全球实践社区,支持有认知障碍的人参与环境设计的行动:辅助技术的挑战和机遇。
Brain Impair. 2023 Sep;24(2):219-228. doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2023.4. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
5
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
6
Stakeholder's experiences of living and caring in technology-rich supported living environments for tenants living with dementia.利益相关者在为患有痴呆症的租户提供的技术丰富的支持性居住环境中的生活和护理体验。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Feb 1;23(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03751-2.
7
Assistive technology and telecare to maintain independent living at home for people with dementia: the ATTILA RCT.辅助技术和远程监护以维持痴呆症患者的独立居家生活:ATTILA RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(19):1-156. doi: 10.3310/hta25190.
8
Strengthening mental health research outcomes through genuine partnerships with young people with lived or living experience: A pilot evaluation study.通过与有过或正在经历精神健康问题的年轻人建立真正的伙伴关系,加强精神健康研究成果:一项试点评估研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Aug;26(4):1703-1715. doi: 10.1111/hex.13777. Epub 2023 May 17.
9
Evolving partnerships: engagement methods in an established health services research team.不断发展的伙伴关系:一个成熟的卫生服务研究团队中的参与方法
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 9;7(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00314-w.
10
Partnering with people with dementia and their care partners, aged care service experts, policymakers and academics: A co-design process.与痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴、老年护理服务专家、政策制定者和学者合作:一个共同设计的过程。
Australas J Ageing. 2019 Sep;38 Suppl 2:53-58. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12635.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the digital divide for people with aphasia: a study protocol for codesigning web accessibility tools and guidelines.弥合失语症患者的数字鸿沟:一项关于共同设计网络可及性工具和指南的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 10;15(8):e099273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099273.
2
The involvement of individuals with speech and language impairments in research: insights from a co-creation process.有言语和语言障碍的个体参与研究:共同创造过程中的见解。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 4;11(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00762-8.
3
Between empowerment, patronization, and surveillance. A semi-structured interview study with persons with dementia and family caregivers on the empowering opportunities and perils of intelligent assistive technologies.

本文引用的文献

1
Personal and complex: The needs and experiences related to technology use for people living with dementia.个人化且复杂:与痴呆症患者使用技术相关的需求和体验。
Dementia (London). 2022 Jul;21(5):1511-1531. doi: 10.1177/14713012221084521. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
2
Advocating the rights of people with dementia to contribute to research: Considerations for researchers and ethics committees.倡导痴呆症患者参与研究的权利:研究人员和伦理委员会应考虑的事项。
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Jun;41(2):309-313. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13023. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
3
Placing assistive technology and telecare in everyday practices of people with dementia and their caregivers: findings from an embedded ethnography of a national dementia trial.
介于赋权、施惠与监督之间。一项针对痴呆症患者及其家庭照料者开展的关于智能辅助技术的赋权机遇与风险的半结构化访谈研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Apr 5;26(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01203-7.
4
A multi-person reflection on using public and patient involvement and engagement to develop dementia research.关于利用公众和患者参与及介入来开展痴呆症研究的多人反思。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jan 27;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00678-3.
5
Lessons learned from a design thinking workshop: Intervention design involving persons living with dementia and care partners.从设计思维工作坊中学到的经验教训:涉及痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴的干预设计。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jan;72(1):282-285. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18576. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
6
Addressing Cognitive Function and Psychological Well-Being in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review on the Use of Technology-Based Interventions.探讨慢性肾脏病患者的认知功能和心理健康:基于技术干预的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 14;20(4):3342. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043342.
7
Reflecting on Living Labs as Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Networks to Evaluate Technological Products for People Living with Dementia.反思生活实验室作为多方利益相关者协作网络,以评估面向痴呆症患者的技术产品。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;20(3):1673. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031673.
将辅助技术和远程护理融入痴呆症患者及其照护者的日常实践中:一项全国性痴呆症试验的嵌入式民族志研究结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01896-y.
4
Are you really doing 'codesign'? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations.你真的在做“共同设计”吗?在与弱势群体合作时的批判性反思。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 3;10(11):e038339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038339.
5
Assessment of need and practice for assistive technology and telecare for people with dementia-The ATTILA (Assistive Technology and Telecare to maintain Independent Living At home for people with dementia) trial.痴呆症患者辅助技术和远程护理的需求评估与实践——ATTILA(为痴呆症患者在家维持独立生活的辅助技术和远程护理)试验
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2019 Sep 3;5:420-430. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.07.010. eCollection 2019.
6
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
7
Role of Occupational Therapy Practitioners in Mass Market Technology Research and Development.职业治疗从业者在大众市场技术研发中的作用。
Am J Occup Ther. 2019 Jan/Feb;73(1):7301347010p1-7301347010p6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2019.028167.
8
Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit.辅助技术政策:来自首届全球辅助技术研究、创新与教育(GREAT)峰会的立场文件。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Jul;13(5):454-466. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1468496. Epub 2018 May 23.
9
Intelligent Assistive Technology for people living with dementia is a rapidly growing and changing area requiring clinical consideration.针对痴呆症患者的智能辅助技术是一个快速发展且不断变化的领域,需要临床予以考虑。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2017 Dec;64(6):510-511. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12434.
10
Development of a discussion tool to enable well-being by providing choices for people with dementia: a qualitative study incorporating codesign and participatory action research.开发一种讨论工具,通过为痴呆症患者提供选择来促进其福祉:一项纳入协同设计和参与式行动研究的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 14;7(11):e017672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017672.