• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中药注射剂与顺铂胸腔内注射治疗肺癌合并恶性胸腔积液的疗效比较:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络Meta分析

Chinese herbal injections versus intrapleural cisplatin for lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Xu Yi-Fang, Chen Yun-Ru, Bu Fan-Long, Huang Yu-Bei, Sun Yu-Xin, Li Cheng-Yin, Sellick Jodi, Liu Jian-Ping, Qin Dan-Mei, Liu Zhao-Lan

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.

Centre for Evidence-based Chinese Medicine, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;12:942941. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.942941. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2022.942941
PMID:36203451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9531116/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication in patients with advanced lung cancer that can severely compromise the quality of life and limit life expectancy. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that Chinese herbal injections (CHIs) may be beneficial in improving quality of life. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to explore several CHIs used for lung cancer patients with MPE.

METHODS

Seven databases were systematically searched for eligible RCTs from inception to November 2021. The primary outcome was the clinical effective rate. Secondary outcomes were the improvement rate of Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score and incidence of adverse events (AEs). The Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. Data analysis was performed using STATA 16.0 and R software 4.1.0. Both pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian NMA were conducted. Competing interventions were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Evidence grading was evaluated using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis online software (https://cinema.ispm.unibe.ch/).

RESULTS

A total of 44 studies involving 2,573 patients were included. The combined Huachansu injection (HCS) with intrapleural cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloro-platinum, DDP) had the highest probability of improving the clinical effective rate (SUCRA, 84.33%). The Kangai injection (KA) combined with DDP had the most improvement rate of KPS score (SUCRA, 80.82%), while the Fufangkushen injection (FFKS) alone was more likely to reduce AEs including gastrointestinal reactions (SUCRA, 89.92%), leukopenia (SUCRA, 91.85%), and chest pain (SUCRA, 98.17%). FFKS combined with DDP ranked the best in reducing the incidence of fever (SUCRA, 75.45%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our NMA showed that CHIs alone or combined with DDP could improve clinical effectiveness and quality of life and reduce AEs, compared to DDP alone. HSC and KA, combined with DDP, may be the most effective considering clinical effective rate and improvement of KPS score, respectively. FFKS, either used alone or in combination therapy with DDP, may be the best in reducing AEs. However, high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed to further support the evidence.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021285275.

摘要

背景

恶性胸腔积液(MPE)是晚期肺癌患者的常见并发症,会严重影响生活质量并缩短预期寿命。随机对照试验(RCT)表明,中药注射剂(CHIs)可能有助于改善生活质量。本网状Meta分析(NMA)旨在探讨几种用于肺癌合并MPE患者的中药注射剂。

方法

系统检索了7个数据库,以查找从数据库建立至2021年11月的符合条件的RCT。主要结局为临床有效率。次要结局为卡氏功能状态(KPS)评分改善率及不良事件(AE)发生率。采用Cochrane偏倚风险2工具评估纳入研究的质量。使用STATA 16.0和R软件4.1.0进行数据分析。进行了成对Meta分析和贝叶斯NMA。使用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)概率对竞争性干预措施进行排序。使用网络Meta分析置信度在线软件(https://cinema.ispm.unibe.ch/)评估证据等级。

结果

共纳入44项研究,涉及2573例患者。华蟾素注射液(HCS)联合胸腔内顺铂(顺二氨二氯铂,DDP)改善临床有效率的概率最高(SUCRA,84.33%)。康艾注射液(KA)联合DDP时KPS评分改善率最高(SUCRA,80.82%),而单独使用复方苦参注射液(FFKS)更有可能降低包括胃肠道反应(SUCRA,89.92%)、白细胞减少(SUCRA,91.85%)和胸痛(SUCRA,98.17%)在内的不良事件发生率。FFKS联合DDP在降低发热发生率方面排名最佳(SUCRA,75.45%)。

结论

我们的NMA表明,与单独使用DDP相比,中药注射剂单独使用或与DDP联合使用可提高临床疗效和生活质量,并减少不良事件。分别考虑临床有效率和KPS评分改善情况,HSC和KA联合DDP可能最为有效。FFKS单独使用或与DDP联合治疗在减少不良事件方面可能是最佳的。然而,需要更大样本量的高质量RCT来进一步支持这些证据。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,标识符CRD42021285275。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d77a/9531116/4d2ef450360f/fonc-12-942941-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d77a/9531116/80ab82982a82/fonc-12-942941-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d77a/9531116/8f189430230c/fonc-12-942941-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d77a/9531116/4d2ef450360f/fonc-12-942941-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d77a/9531116/80ab82982a82/fonc-12-942941-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d77a/9531116/8f189430230c/fonc-12-942941-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d77a/9531116/4d2ef450360f/fonc-12-942941-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Chinese herbal injections versus intrapleural cisplatin for lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.中药注射剂与顺铂胸腔内注射治疗肺癌合并恶性胸腔积液的疗效比较:一项基于随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;12:942941. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.942941. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparative efficacy of various CHIs combined with western medicine for non-small cell lung cancer: A bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.各种中药注射剂联合西药治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 10;13:1037620. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1037620. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Different Traditional Chinese Medicine Injections in the Treatment of Cancer-Related Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.不同中药注射剂治疗癌痛的疗效与安全性比较分析:一项贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 7;12:803676. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.803676. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for Treating Severe Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.中药注射剂治疗重症肺炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jan 10;12:743486. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.743486. eCollection 2021.
5
Chinese herbal injections in combination with radiotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.中药注射剂联合放疗治疗晚期胰腺癌:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Integr Med Res. 2023 Dec;12(4):101004. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2023.101004. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
6
Comparative Efficacy of Tonic Chinese Herbal Injections for Treating Sepsis or Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.滋补类中药注射剂治疗脓毒症或脓毒性休克的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 15;13:830030. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.830030. eCollection 2022.
7
Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for the Treatment of Primary Nephrotic Syndrome: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.中药注射剂治疗原发性肾病综合征的疗效:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Oct 16;11:579241. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.579241. eCollection 2020.
8
The efficacy of azithromycin combined with seven types of Chinese medicine injections in the treatment of pneumonia in children: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.阿奇霉素联合七种中药注射剂治疗儿童肺炎的疗效:一项系统评价和贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 24;15:1378445. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1378445. eCollection 2024.
9
The Optimal Chinese Herbal Injections for Use With Radiotherapy to Treat Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.用于食管癌放射治疗的最佳中药注射剂:系统评价与贝叶斯网络Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Jan 4;9:1470. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01470. eCollection 2018.
10
Effectiveness and Safety of Chinese Herbal Injections Combined with SOX Chemotherapy Regimens for Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.中药注射剂联合SOX化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌的有效性和安全性:一项贝叶斯网络Meta分析
J Cancer. 2024 Jan 1;15(4):889-907. doi: 10.7150/jca.91301. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Intrapleural administration with traditional Chinese medicine injections ( preparations) in controlling malignant pleural effusion: a clustered systematic review and meta-analysis.中药注射剂(制剂)胸腔内给药控制恶性胸腔积液的聚类系统评价与Meta分析
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Apr 24;16:1519794. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1519794. eCollection 2025.
2
Cinobufagin inhibits M2‑like tumor‑associated macrophage polarization to attenuate the invasion and migration of lung cancer cells.华蟾酥毒基抑制 M2 型肿瘤相关巨噬细胞极化从而减轻肺癌细胞的侵袭和迁移。
Int J Oncol. 2024 Nov;65(5). doi: 10.3892/ijo.2024.5690. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Malignant Pleural Effusions-A Review of Current Guidelines and Practices.恶性胸腔积液——当前指南与实践综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 26;10(23):5535. doi: 10.3390/jcm10235535.
2
Advances in analytical techniques and quality control of traditional Chinese medicine injections.中药注射液分析技术与质量控制的进展。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2021 Nov 30;206:114353. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114353. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
3
Traditional Chinese Medicine in Cancer Care: An Overview of 5834 Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Chinese.
Chemical Composition, Pharmacological Effects and Clinical Applications of Cinobufacini.
华蟾素的化学成分、药理作用及临床应用。
Chin J Integr Med. 2024 Apr;30(4):366-378. doi: 10.1007/s11655-024-3708-6. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
中医药治疗癌症的疗效评价:基于 5834 项中文随机对照试验的系统综述。
Integr Cancer Ther. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:15347354211031650. doi: 10.1177/15347354211031650.
4
Clinical Application of Chinese Herbal Injection for Cancer Care: Evidence-Mapping of the Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Randomized Controlled Trials.中药注射剂在癌症护理中的临床应用:系统评价、Meta分析和随机对照试验的证据图谱
Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 7;12:666368. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.666368. eCollection 2021.
5
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
7
CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis.CINeMA:一种评估网络荟萃分析结果可信度的方法。
PLoS Med. 2020 Apr 3;17(4):e1003082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003082. eCollection 2020 Apr.
8
Clinical efficacy and safety of aidi injection combination with vinorelbine and cisplatin for advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 54 randomized controlled trials.艾迪注射液联合长春瑞滨和顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效和安全性:54 项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacol Res. 2020 Mar;153:104637. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104637. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
9
Malignant pleural effusion management: keeping the flood gates shut.恶性胸腔积液的处理:堵住决堤之口。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Jun;8(6):609-618. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30373-X. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
10
BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses.BUGSnet:一个 R 包,用于方便贝叶斯网络荟萃分析的实施和报告。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0829-2.