Boyd D P, Begley T M
Br J Med Psychol. 1987 Jun;60(2):155-61. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1987.tb02726.x.
Controversy has arisen over the usefulness and reliability of the Jenkins Activity Survey (JAS) as a measure of Type A behaviour. Ray & Bozek (1980), Jenkins & Zyzanski (1982) and Ray (1984) have exchanged contrasting views. Our data show low internal consistency scores for the four components of the JAS: i.e. the Type A scale itself and factors speed and impatience (S), job involvement (J), and hard-driving competitiveness (H); and a low test-retest reliability result for the Type A scale. Further, the weighted scoring scheme of the JAS is questioned. Recommendations are made to eliminate the weighted scoring scheme, delete factors S, J, and H, and revise specific items in the JAS.
詹金斯活动调查(JAS)作为一种衡量A型行为的方法,其有效性和可靠性引发了争议。雷和博泽克(1980年)、詹金斯和齐赞斯基(1982年)以及雷(1984年)交换了截然不同的观点。我们的数据显示,JAS的四个组成部分的内部一致性得分较低,即A型量表本身以及速度和不耐烦因素(S)、工作投入度(J)和强硬竞争因素(H);A型量表的重测信度结果也较低。此外,JAS的加权计分方案也受到质疑。建议取消加权计分方案,删除因素S、J和H,并修订JAS中的具体项目。