• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低肺癌和结直肠癌筛查率在一个安全网急诊人群中。

Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 11;23(5):739-745. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55351.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55351
PMID:36205665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9541977/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A suspected diagnosis of cancer through an emergency department (ED) visit is associated with poor clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the rate at which ED patients attend cancer screenings for lung, colorectal (CRC), and breast cancers based on national guidelines set forth by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. Patients were randomly approached in the Eskenazi Hospital ED between August 2019-February 2020 and were surveyed to determine whether they would be eligible and had attended lung, CRC, and breast cancer screenings, as well as their awareness of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Patients who were English-speaking and ≥18 years old, and who were not critically ill or intoxicated or being seen for acute decompensated psychiatric illness were offered enrollment. Enrolled subjects were surveyed to determine eligibility for lung, colorectal, and breast cancer screenings based on guidelines set by the USPSTF. No cancer screenings were actually done during the ED visit.

RESULTS

A total of 500 patients were enrolled in this study. More participants were female (54.4%), and a majority were Black (53.0%). Most participants had both insurance (80.2%) and access to primary care (62.8%). Among the entire cohort, 63.0% identified as smokers, and 62.2% (140/225) of the 50- to 80-year-old participants qualified for lung cancer screening. No patients were screened for lung cancer in this cohort (0/225). Only 0.6% (3/500) were aware that LDCT was the preferred method for screening. Based on pack years, 35.5% (32/90) of the patients who were 40-49 years old and 6.7% (6/90) of those 30-39 years old would eventually qualify for screening. Regarding CRC screening, 43.6% (218/500) of the entire cohort was eligible. However, of those patients only 54% (118/218) had been screened. Comparatively, 77.7% (87/112) of the eligible females had been screened for breast cancer, but only 54.5% (61/112) had been screened in the prior two years.

CONCLUSION

Many ED patients are not screened for lung/colorectal/breast cancers even though many are eligible and have reported access to primary care. This study demonstrates an opportunity and a need to address cancer screening in the ED.

摘要

简介

通过急诊部(ED)就诊疑似癌症诊断与临床结局不佳相关。本研究的目的是根据美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)制定的国家指南,探讨 ED 患者根据国家指南进行肺癌、结直肠癌(CRC)和乳腺癌筛查的比率。

方法

这是一项前瞻性队列研究。2019 年 8 月至 2020 年 2 月期间,在 Eskenazi 医院 ED 随机接触患者,并对其进行调查,以确定他们是否符合条件并接受了肺癌、CRC 和乳腺癌筛查,以及他们对低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查肺癌的认识。纳入标准为:年龄在 18 岁及以上、英语流利、病情未处于危急或中毒状态、或并非因急性失代偿性精神疾病就诊的患者。纳入的患者接受调查,以确定他们是否符合 USPSTF 制定的肺癌、结直肠癌和乳腺癌筛查指南。在 ED 就诊期间并未进行任何癌症筛查。

结果

本研究共纳入 500 名患者。参与者中女性(54.4%)居多,大多数为黑人(53.0%)。大多数参与者均有保险(80.2%)和初级保健(62.8%)。在整个队列中,63.0%的参与者为吸烟者,50-80 岁的参与者中有 62.2%(140/225)符合肺癌筛查条件。本队列中未进行肺癌筛查(0/225)。仅有 0.6%(3/500)的患者知晓 LDCT 是筛查的首选方法。根据吸烟包年数,40-49 岁的患者中有 35.5%(32/90)和 30-39 岁的患者中有 6.7%(6/90)最终将符合筛查条件。关于 CRC 筛查,整个队列中有 43.6%(218/500)的患者符合条件。然而,这些患者中只有 54%(118/218)接受了筛查。相比之下,77.7%(87/112)符合条件的女性已接受乳腺癌筛查,但只有 54.5%(61/112)在过去两年内接受了筛查。

结论

尽管许多 ED 患者有资格接受初级保健,但许多患者并未接受肺癌/结直肠癌/乳腺癌筛查。本研究表明,在 ED 中进行癌症筛查的机会和需求。

相似文献

1
Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population.低肺癌和结直肠癌筛查率在一个安全网急诊人群中。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 11;23(5):739-745. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55351.
2
Evaluation of the Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.肺癌低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查的获益与危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究。
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):988-997. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1077.
3
Intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among emergency department patients: results from a randomised pilot study.提高急诊科患者结直肠癌筛查率的干预措施:一项随机试点研究的结果。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jun 20;41(7):422-428. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213761.
4
Performance of Risk Factor-Based Guidelines and Model-Based Chest CT Lung Cancer Screening in World Trade Center-Exposed Fire Department Rescue/Recovery Workers.基于风险因素的指南和基于模型的胸部CT肺癌筛查在世贸中心暴露的消防救援/恢复工作人员中的表现
Chest. 2021 May;159(5):2060-2071. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.11.028. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
Modeling Strategies to Optimize Cancer Screening in USPSTF Guideline-Noncompliant Women.优化美国预防服务工作组指南中不符合筛查标准女性癌症筛查的建模策略
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):885-894. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0952.
6
Assessing the efficiency of eligibility criteria for low-dose computed tomography lung screening in China according to current guidelines.根据现行指南评估中国低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查的入选标准的效率。
BMC Med. 2024 Jun 26;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03445-5.
7
Changes in Health Care Access and Preventive Health Screenings by Race and Ethnicity.种族和民族的医疗保健机会和预防性健康筛查的变化。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235058. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5058.
8
Estimated US Cancer Deaths Prevented With Increased Use of Lung, Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening.增加使用肺癌、结直肠癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查可预防的美国估计癌症死亡人数。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344698. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44698.
9
The aggregate value of cancer screenings in the United States: full potential value and value considering adherence.美国癌症筛查的总价值:充分潜力价值和考虑依从性的价值。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 7;23(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09738-4.
10
Characteristics of Persons Screened for Lung Cancer in the United States : A Cohort Study.美国肺癌筛查人群的特征:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Nov;175(11):1501-1505. doi: 10.7326/M22-1325. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying lung cancer in Emergency Department patients outside national lung cancer screening guidelines.在不符合国家肺癌筛查指南的急诊科患者中识别肺癌。
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):695-706. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1399. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Effectiveness of colonoscopy, immune fecal occult blood testing, and risk-graded screening strategies in colorectal cancer screening.结肠镜检查、免疫粪便潜血检测及风险分级筛查策略在结直肠癌筛查中的有效性。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):2270-2280. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2270.
3
Prediction and analysis of albumin-bilirubin score combined with liver function index and carcinoembryonic antigen on liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.白蛋白-胆红素评分联合肝功能指标及癌胚抗原对结直肠癌肝转移的预测与分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jun 27;16(6):1670-1680. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1670.
4
Lung cancer in the emergency department.急诊科中的肺癌
Emerg Cancer Care. 2023;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s44201-023-00018-9. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
5
Characteristics and Barriers of Emergency Department Patients Overdue for Cancer Screening.癌症筛查逾期的急诊科患者的特征和障碍。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;25(1):101-110. doi: 10.5811/westjem.60400.
6
Cancer Screening Abstinence Rates and Rationales Among Regular Outpatients at a Rural Hospital in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study.日本一家乡村医院定期门诊患者的癌症筛查戒断率及理由:一项横断面研究
Int J Gen Med. 2023 Nov 10;16:5235-5240. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S441704. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening.等待期干预措施:识别和转诊未坚持进行结直肠癌筛查的个体。
Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
2
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
3
The 2021 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Lung Cancer Screening: The More Things Stay the Same….2021年美国预防服务工作组关于肺癌筛查的建议:万变不离其宗……
JAMA Oncol. 2021 May 1;7(5):684-686. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.8376.
4
Disparities in Cancer Prevention in the COVID-19 Era.新冠疫情时代的癌症预防差距。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Nov;13(11):893-896. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0447. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
5
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.
6
An Intervention to Increase Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Emergency Department Patients: Results of a Randomized Pilot Study.一项提高急诊科患者宫颈癌筛查接受率的干预措施:一项随机试点研究的结果
J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):836-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
7
Trends in lung cancer screening in the United States, 2016-2017.2016 - 2017年美国肺癌筛查趋势
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(3):873-881. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.105.
8
Reducing Emergency Department Length of Stay.缩短急诊科住院时间。
JAMA. 2019 Apr 9;321(14):1402-1403. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21812.
9
Effectiveness of health education materials in general practice waiting rooms: a cross-sectional study.在一般实践候诊室中使用健康教育材料的效果:一项横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;68(677):e869-e876. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X699773. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
Independent determinants of prolonged emergency department length of stay in a tertiary care centre: a prospective cohort study.独立决定因素对三级护理中心急诊停留时间延长的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Sep 20;26(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0547-5.