Suppr超能文献

低肺癌和结直肠癌筛查率在一个安全网急诊人群中。

Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population.

机构信息

Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 11;23(5):739-745. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55351.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A suspected diagnosis of cancer through an emergency department (ED) visit is associated with poor clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to explore the rate at which ED patients attend cancer screenings for lung, colorectal (CRC), and breast cancers based on national guidelines set forth by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study. Patients were randomly approached in the Eskenazi Hospital ED between August 2019-February 2020 and were surveyed to determine whether they would be eligible and had attended lung, CRC, and breast cancer screenings, as well as their awareness of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT). Patients who were English-speaking and ≥18 years old, and who were not critically ill or intoxicated or being seen for acute decompensated psychiatric illness were offered enrollment. Enrolled subjects were surveyed to determine eligibility for lung, colorectal, and breast cancer screenings based on guidelines set by the USPSTF. No cancer screenings were actually done during the ED visit.

RESULTS

A total of 500 patients were enrolled in this study. More participants were female (54.4%), and a majority were Black (53.0%). Most participants had both insurance (80.2%) and access to primary care (62.8%). Among the entire cohort, 63.0% identified as smokers, and 62.2% (140/225) of the 50- to 80-year-old participants qualified for lung cancer screening. No patients were screened for lung cancer in this cohort (0/225). Only 0.6% (3/500) were aware that LDCT was the preferred method for screening. Based on pack years, 35.5% (32/90) of the patients who were 40-49 years old and 6.7% (6/90) of those 30-39 years old would eventually qualify for screening. Regarding CRC screening, 43.6% (218/500) of the entire cohort was eligible. However, of those patients only 54% (118/218) had been screened. Comparatively, 77.7% (87/112) of the eligible females had been screened for breast cancer, but only 54.5% (61/112) had been screened in the prior two years.

CONCLUSION

Many ED patients are not screened for lung/colorectal/breast cancers even though many are eligible and have reported access to primary care. This study demonstrates an opportunity and a need to address cancer screening in the ED.

摘要

简介

通过急诊部(ED)就诊疑似癌症诊断与临床结局不佳相关。本研究的目的是根据美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)制定的国家指南,探讨 ED 患者根据国家指南进行肺癌、结直肠癌(CRC)和乳腺癌筛查的比率。

方法

这是一项前瞻性队列研究。2019 年 8 月至 2020 年 2 月期间,在 Eskenazi 医院 ED 随机接触患者,并对其进行调查,以确定他们是否符合条件并接受了肺癌、CRC 和乳腺癌筛查,以及他们对低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查肺癌的认识。纳入标准为:年龄在 18 岁及以上、英语流利、病情未处于危急或中毒状态、或并非因急性失代偿性精神疾病就诊的患者。纳入的患者接受调查,以确定他们是否符合 USPSTF 制定的肺癌、结直肠癌和乳腺癌筛查指南。在 ED 就诊期间并未进行任何癌症筛查。

结果

本研究共纳入 500 名患者。参与者中女性(54.4%)居多,大多数为黑人(53.0%)。大多数参与者均有保险(80.2%)和初级保健(62.8%)。在整个队列中,63.0%的参与者为吸烟者,50-80 岁的参与者中有 62.2%(140/225)符合肺癌筛查条件。本队列中未进行肺癌筛查(0/225)。仅有 0.6%(3/500)的患者知晓 LDCT 是筛查的首选方法。根据吸烟包年数,40-49 岁的患者中有 35.5%(32/90)和 30-39 岁的患者中有 6.7%(6/90)最终将符合筛查条件。关于 CRC 筛查,整个队列中有 43.6%(218/500)的患者符合条件。然而,这些患者中只有 54%(118/218)接受了筛查。相比之下,77.7%(87/112)符合条件的女性已接受乳腺癌筛查,但只有 54.5%(61/112)在过去两年内接受了筛查。

结论

尽管许多 ED 患者有资格接受初级保健,但许多患者并未接受肺癌/结直肠癌/乳腺癌筛查。本研究表明,在 ED 中进行癌症筛查的机会和需求。

相似文献

1
Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population.
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 11;23(5):739-745. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55351.
5
Modeling Strategies to Optimize Cancer Screening in USPSTF Guideline-Noncompliant Women.
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):885-894. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0952.
7
Changes in Health Care Access and Preventive Health Screenings by Race and Ethnicity.
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235058. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5058.
8
Estimated US Cancer Deaths Prevented With Increased Use of Lung, Colorectal, Breast, and Cervical Cancer Screening.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344698. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.44698.
10
Characteristics of Persons Screened for Lung Cancer in the United States : A Cohort Study.
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Nov;175(11):1501-1505. doi: 10.7326/M22-1325. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying lung cancer in Emergency Department patients outside national lung cancer screening guidelines.
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):695-706. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1399. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Lung cancer in the emergency department.
Emerg Cancer Care. 2023;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s44201-023-00018-9. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
5
Characteristics and Barriers of Emergency Department Patients Overdue for Cancer Screening.
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;25(1):101-110. doi: 10.5811/westjem.60400.
6

本文引用的文献

1
Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening.
Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
2
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
4
Disparities in Cancer Prevention in the COVID-19 Era.
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Nov;13(11):893-896. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0447. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
7
Trends in lung cancer screening in the United States, 2016-2017.
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(3):873-881. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.105.
8
Reducing Emergency Department Length of Stay.
JAMA. 2019 Apr 9;321(14):1402-1403. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21812.
9
Effectiveness of health education materials in general practice waiting rooms: a cross-sectional study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;68(677):e869-e876. doi: 10.3399/bjgp18X699773. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
10
Independent determinants of prolonged emergency department length of stay in a tertiary care centre: a prospective cohort study.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Sep 20;26(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0547-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验