• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项提高急诊科患者宫颈癌筛查接受率的干预措施:一项随机试点研究的结果

An Intervention to Increase Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Emergency Department Patients: Results of a Randomized Pilot Study.

作者信息

Adler David, Abar Beau, Wood Nancy, Bonham Adrienne

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):836-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.07.021
PMID:31594738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6904518/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency departments (EDs) have the potential to promote critical public and preventive health interventions. Cervical cancer (CC) screening has been a cornerstone of preventive health efforts for decades. Approximately 20% of U.S. women are not adherent with CC screening guidelines-considerably below the U.S. Federal Government's target. ED patients are disproportionately nonadherent with CC screening guidelines. The ED, therefore, is an optimal setting to target women with an intervention that promotes CC screening.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility and potential efficacy of an intervention, grounded in behavioral change theory, to promote uptake of CC screening among ED patients.

METHODS

Design: Randomized clinical trial pilot study; Patients: Women aged 21-65 years that were identified in the ED to be nonadherent with CC screening recommendations; Setting: Single center urban academic ED.

RESULTS

Among enrolled participants, 355 (79%) were determined to be adherent with screening recommendations and 95 (21%) were determined to be either nonadherent or have uncertain adherence. Among the nonadherent/uncertain group, 47 were randomized to the control condition (referral only) and 48 were randomized to the intervention condition. Thirty-six percent of participants in the control condition received or scheduled screening during the follow-up period. In the intervention condition, 43% received or scheduled screening during the follow-up period-a 19% relative improvement over the control condition.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study demonstrates feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a behavioral intervention to increase uptake of CC screening among ED patients.

摘要

背景

急诊科有潜力促进关键的公共卫生和预防健康干预措施。几十年来,宫颈癌(CC)筛查一直是预防健康工作的基石。约20%的美国女性未遵循CC筛查指南,远低于美国联邦政府的目标。急诊科患者不遵循CC筛查指南的比例过高。因此,急诊科是针对女性进行促进CC筛查干预的理想场所。

目的

评估基于行为改变理论的干预措施在促进急诊科患者接受CC筛查方面的可行性和潜在效果。

方法

设计:随机临床试验试点研究;患者:在急诊科被确定未遵循CC筛查建议的21至65岁女性;地点:单中心城市学术急诊科。

结果

在纳入的参与者中,355人(79%)被确定遵循筛查建议,95人(21%)被确定为不遵循或依从性不确定。在不遵循/不确定组中,47人被随机分配到对照条件(仅转诊),48人被随机分配到干预条件。在随访期间,对照条件下36%的参与者接受或安排了筛查。在干预条件下,43%的参与者在随访期间接受或安排了筛查,比对照条件相对提高了19%。

结论

这项试点研究证明了一种行为干预措施在增加急诊科患者接受CC筛查方面的可行性和初步效果。

相似文献

1
An Intervention to Increase Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Emergency Department Patients: Results of a Randomized Pilot Study.一项提高急诊科患者宫颈癌筛查接受率的干预措施:一项随机试点研究的结果
J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):836-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
2
Increasing Uptake of Lung Cancer Screening Among Emergency Department Patients: A Pilot Study.提高急诊科患者肺癌筛查率:一项试点研究。
J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;67(2):e164-e176. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.03.034. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
3
Intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among emergency department patients: results from a randomised pilot study.提高急诊科患者结直肠癌筛查率的干预措施:一项随机试点研究的结果。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jun 20;41(7):422-428. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213761.
4
Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.邮寄人乳头瘤病毒检测试剂盒与常规护理提醒对宫颈癌筛查率、癌前病变检出率和治疗效果的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914729. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14729.
5
Effects of a Community Health Worker-Led Multimedia Intervention on the Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening among South Asian Women: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.社区卫生工作者主导的多媒体干预对南亚裔妇女宫颈癌筛查率的影响:一项试点随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 23;16(17):3072. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173072.
6
Population-based organized cervical cancer screening pilot program in France.法国基于人群的有组织宫颈癌筛查试点项目。
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2018 Sep;27(5):486-492. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000365.
7
Changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cervical cancer screening: The effects of an educational intervention in rural Kenya.改变宫颈癌筛查相关的知识、态度和行为:肯尼亚农村地区一项教育干预措施的效果
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jul;98(7):884-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
8
Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.马来西亚巴生市宫颈癌筛查项目中最有效召回方法的研究方案。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(10):5867-70. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.10.5867.
9
Cervical cancer screening uptake: A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of sending invitation letters to non-adherent women combined with sending their general practitioners a list of their non-adherent patients (study protocol).宫颈癌筛查参与率:一项随机对照试验,评估向不依从女性发送邀请信并向其全科医生发送不依从患者名单的效果(研究方案)。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 10;10:1035288. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035288. eCollection 2022.
10
Cervical cancer screening in an urban emergency department.城市急诊科的宫颈癌筛查
Ann Emerg Med. 1992 Aug;21(8):933-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82931-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-cost interventions to increase uptake of cervical cancer screening among emergency department patients: Results of a randomized clinical trial.提高急诊科患者宫颈癌筛查接受率的低成本干预措施:一项随机临床试验的结果
Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Jul;32(7):776-784. doi: 10.1111/acem.15101. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
2
Electronic Health Interventions and Cervical Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康干预措施与宫颈癌筛查:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 31;26:e58066. doi: 10.2196/58066.
3
Comparing Cancer Primary and Secondary Prevention Documentation Between Different Digital Health Approaches in the Emergency Department.比较急诊科不同数字健康方法之间的癌症一级和二级预防记录
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Sep 26;5(1):689-696. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0104. eCollection 2024.
4
The Effect of an Educational Intervention on Breast Cancer Screening of Rural Women: Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior.教育干预对农村妇女乳腺癌筛查的影响:计划行为理论的应用。
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241266788. doi: 10.1177/10732748241266788.
5
Lung cancer in the emergency department.急诊科中的肺癌
Emerg Cancer Care. 2023;2(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s44201-023-00018-9. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
6
Evaluating follow-up rates in cancer screening interventions among emergency department patients.评估急诊科患者癌症筛查干预措施的随访率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;31(10):1071-1073. doi: 10.1111/acem.14938. Epub 2024 May 14.
7
Emergency Department Visits Before Cancer Diagnosis Among Women at Mayo Clinic.梅奥诊所女性癌症诊断前的急诊科就诊情况
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2024 Apr 4;8(3):213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.03.002. eCollection 2024 Jun.
8
Characteristics and Barriers of Emergency Department Patients Overdue for Cancer Screening.癌症筛查逾期的急诊科患者的特征和障碍。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;25(1):101-110. doi: 10.5811/westjem.60400.
9
Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening.等待期干预措施:识别和转诊未坚持进行结直肠癌筛查的个体。
Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
10
Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population.低肺癌和结直肠癌筛查率在一个安全网急诊人群中。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 11;23(5):739-745. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55351.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a text-messaging-based smoking cessation intervention ("Happy Quit") for smoking cessation in China: A randomized controlled trial.基于短信的戒烟干预(“快乐戒烟”)在中国戒烟中的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2018 Dec 18;15(12):e1002713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002713. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Text Messaging Interventions on Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review.短信干预对癌症筛查率的影响:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 24;19(8):e296. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7893.
3
Preventive Health Behavior Change Text Message Interventions: A Meta-analysis.预防健康行为改变的短信干预措施:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):391-402. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.042. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
4
Review article: Effectiveness of ultra-brief interventions in the emergency department to reduce alcohol consumption: A systematic review.综述文章:急诊科超简短干预措施减少酒精消费的有效性:一项系统综述。
Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Dec;28(6):629-640. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12624. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
5
Identifying Areas for Improvement in the HIV Screening Process of a High-Prevalence Emergency Department.确定高流行率急诊科艾滋病毒筛查流程中的改进领域。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2016 Jun;30(6):247-53. doi: 10.1089/apc.2016.0068.
6
The Impact of Automated Brief Messages Promoting Lifestyle Changes Delivered Via Mobile Devices to People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials.通过移动设备向2型糖尿病患者发送促进生活方式改变的自动简短信息的影响:系统文献综述和对照试验的荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 19;18(4):e86. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5425.
7
Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation.基于手机的戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 10;4(4):CD006611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006611.pub4.
8
Cancer screening test use - United States, 2013.2013年美国癌症筛查检测的使用情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 May 8;64(17):464-8.
9
Mobile text messaging for health: a systematic review of reviews.用于健康的移动文本信息:综述的系统评价
Annu Rev Public Health. 2015 Mar 18;36:393-415. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122855.
10
Mobile phone SMS messages can enhance healthy behaviour: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.手机短信能增强健康行为:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(4):397-416. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1022847. Epub 2015 May 28.