• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

等待期干预措施:识别和转诊未坚持进行结直肠癌筛查的个体。

Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Abar Beau, Park Chanjun Syd, Dalawari Preeti, Klausner Howard, Ogedegbe Chinwe, Valassis Steven, Koneswaran Haran, Adler David, Bradley Keith

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Box 655c, Rochester, NY 14620 USA.

Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO USA.

出版信息

Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

DOI:10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7
PMID:36312902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9589631/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite unanimous recommendations from numerous specialty societies on regular colorectal cancer screening, a substantial proportion of eligible adults are non-adherent with screening. The current study investigated whether research associates (RAs) in the emergency department (ED) can adequately assess patients' adherence with colorectal cancer screening recommendations, outlined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and provide referrals to individuals who are found to be non-adherent.

METHODS

RAs at seven heterogeneous hospitals in the USA queried non-emergent adult patients and visitors between the ages of 50 and 75. After obtaining verbal consent, the participant's adherence with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening was assessed. Participants found due for screening were provided with referrals to obtain these recommended screenings.

RESULTS

A total of 8258 participants were surveyed on their colorectal cancer screening status, with RAs identifying 2063 participants who were not adherent with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and 67 for whom adherence could not be determined (total 27%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that RAs can identify a large volume of eligible adults who would benefit from colorectal cancer screening across a variety of emergency department settings.

摘要

背景

尽管众多专业学会一致建议定期进行结直肠癌筛查,但仍有相当一部分符合条件的成年人未坚持筛查。本研究调查了急诊科的研究助理(RAs)能否充分评估患者对美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)概述的结直肠癌筛查建议的依从性,并为未坚持筛查的个体提供转诊服务。

方法

美国七家不同医院的研究助理询问了年龄在50至75岁之间的非急诊成年患者和访客。在获得口头同意后,评估参与者对USPSTF结直肠癌筛查指南的依从性。被发现应进行筛查的参与者被提供转诊服务以获得这些推荐的筛查。

结果

共对8258名参与者的结直肠癌筛查状况进行了调查,研究助理识别出2063名未遵循USPSTF结直肠癌筛查指南的参与者,以及67名无法确定依从性的参与者(总计27%)。

结论

我们的研究表明,研究助理能够识别出大量符合条件的成年人,他们将在各种急诊科环境中从结直肠癌筛查中受益。

相似文献

1
Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening.等待期干预措施:识别和转诊未坚持进行结直肠癌筛查的个体。
Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
2
Identifying Cancer Screening Adherence in the Emergency Department Utilizing Research Associates.利用研究助理在急诊科识别癌症筛查的依从性。
J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;59(6):894-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
3
Modeling Strategies to Optimize Cancer Screening in USPSTF Guideline-Noncompliant Women.优化美国预防服务工作组指南中不符合筛查标准女性癌症筛查的建模策略
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):885-894. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0952.
4
Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population.低肺癌和结直肠癌筛查率在一个安全网急诊人群中。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 11;23(5):739-745. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55351.
5
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Changes in Health Care Access and Preventive Health Screenings by Race and Ethnicity.种族和民族的医疗保健机会和预防性健康筛查的变化。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235058. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5058.
8
The aggregate value of cancer screenings in the United States: full potential value and value considering adherence.美国癌症筛查的总价值:充分潜力价值和考虑依从性的价值。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 7;23(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09738-4.
9
Sensitivity of US Preventive Services Task Force and PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria in individuals with lung cancer in South Dakota self-reporting as Indigenous and non-Indigenous.南达科他州肺癌患者自我报告为原住民和非原住民的情况下,美国预防服务工作组和 PLCOm2012 肺癌筛查资格标准的敏感性。
Cancer. 2023 Dec 15;129(24):3894-3904. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34947. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
10
Preventive care in the emergency department, Part II: Clinical preventive services--an emergency medicine evidence-based review. Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Public Health and Education Task Force Preventive Services Work Group.急诊科的预防保健,第二部分:临床预防服务——一项基于循证医学的急诊医学综述。学术急诊医学协会公共卫生与教育特别工作组预防服务工作小组
Acad Emerg Med. 2000 Sep;7(9):1042-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb02098.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Cancer Primary and Secondary Prevention Documentation Between Different Digital Health Approaches in the Emergency Department.比较急诊科不同数字健康方法之间的癌症一级和二级预防记录
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Sep 26;5(1):689-696. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0104. eCollection 2024.
2
Characteristics and Barriers of Emergency Department Patients Overdue for Cancer Screening.癌症筛查逾期的急诊科患者的特征和障碍。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;25(1):101-110. doi: 10.5811/westjem.60400.
3
Worsened outcomes of newly diagnosed cancer in patients with recent emergency care visits: A retrospective cohort study of 3699 adults in a safety net health system.近期急诊就诊的新发癌症患者预后恶化:安全网医疗体系中 3699 名成年人的回顾性队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(4):4832-4841. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5303. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
4
Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population.低肺癌和结直肠癌筛查率在一个安全网急诊人群中。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 11;23(5):739-745. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55351.

本文引用的文献

1
Persistent Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Tell-Tale Sign for Implementing New Guidelines in Younger Adults.结直肠癌筛查的持续差异:提示在年轻人中实施新指南的重要信号。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Sep 2;31(9):1701-1709. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1330.
2
Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的一项更新建模研究。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1998-2011. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.5746.
3
Identifying Cancer Screening Adherence in the Emergency Department Utilizing Research Associates.利用研究助理在急诊科识别癌症筛查的依从性。
J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;59(6):894-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
4
Colorectal cancer screening in the USA in the wake of COVID-19.新冠疫情后美国的结直肠癌筛查
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;5(8):726-727. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30191-6. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
5
Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions in the Opportunistic Setting.机会性筛查中的结直肠癌筛查决策。
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020 Jul;30(3):413-422. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
6
An Intervention to Increase Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Emergency Department Patients: Results of a Randomized Pilot Study.一项提高急诊科患者宫颈癌筛查接受率的干预措施:一项随机试点研究的结果
J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;57(6):836-843. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
7
Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions.急诊科拥挤:原因、后果和解决方案的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203316. eCollection 2018.
8
Emergency department screening and interventions for substance use disorders.急诊部门对物质使用障碍的筛查和干预。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018 Aug 6;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13722-018-0117-1.
9
Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States.美国癌症筛查的模式和趋势。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jul 26;15:E97. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170465.
10
Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population.基于大型社区人群的结直肠癌筛查对癌症发病率和死亡率的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1383-1391.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Jul 19.