Suppr超能文献

等待期干预措施:识别和转诊未坚持进行结直肠癌筛查的个体。

Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Abar Beau, Park Chanjun Syd, Dalawari Preeti, Klausner Howard, Ogedegbe Chinwe, Valassis Steven, Koneswaran Haran, Adler David, Bradley Keith

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center, 265 Crittenden Blvd, Box 655c, Rochester, NY 14620 USA.

Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO USA.

出版信息

Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite unanimous recommendations from numerous specialty societies on regular colorectal cancer screening, a substantial proportion of eligible adults are non-adherent with screening. The current study investigated whether research associates (RAs) in the emergency department (ED) can adequately assess patients' adherence with colorectal cancer screening recommendations, outlined by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and provide referrals to individuals who are found to be non-adherent.

METHODS

RAs at seven heterogeneous hospitals in the USA queried non-emergent adult patients and visitors between the ages of 50 and 75. After obtaining verbal consent, the participant's adherence with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening was assessed. Participants found due for screening were provided with referrals to obtain these recommended screenings.

RESULTS

A total of 8258 participants were surveyed on their colorectal cancer screening status, with RAs identifying 2063 participants who were not adherent with USPSTF guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and 67 for whom adherence could not be determined (total 27%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that RAs can identify a large volume of eligible adults who would benefit from colorectal cancer screening across a variety of emergency department settings.

摘要

背景

尽管众多专业学会一致建议定期进行结直肠癌筛查,但仍有相当一部分符合条件的成年人未坚持筛查。本研究调查了急诊科的研究助理(RAs)能否充分评估患者对美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)概述的结直肠癌筛查建议的依从性,并为未坚持筛查的个体提供转诊服务。

方法

美国七家不同医院的研究助理询问了年龄在50至75岁之间的非急诊成年患者和访客。在获得口头同意后,评估参与者对USPSTF结直肠癌筛查指南的依从性。被发现应进行筛查的参与者被提供转诊服务以获得这些推荐的筛查。

结果

共对8258名参与者的结直肠癌筛查状况进行了调查,研究助理识别出2063名未遵循USPSTF结直肠癌筛查指南的参与者,以及67名无法确定依从性的参与者(总计27%)。

结论

我们的研究表明,研究助理能够识别出大量符合条件的成年人,他们将在各种急诊科环境中从结直肠癌筛查中受益。

相似文献

1
Intervention during wait time: identification and referral of individuals non-adherent for colorectal cancer screening.
Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00012-7. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
2
Identifying Cancer Screening Adherence in the Emergency Department Utilizing Research Associates.
J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;59(6):894-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
3
Modeling Strategies to Optimize Cancer Screening in USPSTF Guideline-Noncompliant Women.
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):885-894. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0952.
4
Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population.
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 11;23(5):739-745. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55351.
5
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
7
Changes in Health Care Access and Preventive Health Screenings by Race and Ethnicity.
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Feb 2;5(2):e235058. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.5058.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Cancer Primary and Secondary Prevention Documentation Between Different Digital Health Approaches in the Emergency Department.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Sep 26;5(1):689-696. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0104. eCollection 2024.
2
Characteristics and Barriers of Emergency Department Patients Overdue for Cancer Screening.
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jan;25(1):101-110. doi: 10.5811/westjem.60400.
4
Low Rates of Lung and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake Among a Safety-net Emergency Department Population.
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 11;23(5):739-745. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.5.55351.

本文引用的文献

1
Persistent Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Tell-Tale Sign for Implementing New Guidelines in Younger Adults.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Sep 2;31(9):1701-1709. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1330.
2
Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1998-2011. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.5746.
3
Identifying Cancer Screening Adherence in the Emergency Department Utilizing Research Associates.
J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;59(6):894-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
4
Colorectal cancer screening in the USA in the wake of COVID-19.
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Aug;5(8):726-727. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30191-6. Epub 2020 Jun 19.
5
Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions in the Opportunistic Setting.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2020 Jul;30(3):413-422. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.012. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
Emergency department crowding: A systematic review of causes, consequences and solutions.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203316. eCollection 2018.
8
Emergency department screening and interventions for substance use disorders.
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2018 Aug 6;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13722-018-0117-1.
9
Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jul 26;15:E97. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170465.
10
Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population.
Gastroenterology. 2018 Nov;155(5):1383-1391.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验