• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the questionnaire on Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia (qPAD) using a large sample of staff from Australian residential aged care homes.采用澳大利亚养老院工作人员的大样本,对晚期痴呆症姑息治疗问卷(qPAD)进行探索性和验证性因子分析。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2023 Jan;18(1):e12505. doi: 10.1111/opn.12505. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
2
Development of the questionnaire on palliative care for advanced dementia (qPAD).开发晚期痴呆症姑息治疗问卷(qPAD)。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2012 Nov;27(7):537-43. doi: 10.1177/1533317512459793. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
3
Knowledge and Attitudes towards Palliative Care: Validation of the Spanish Version of Questionnaire on Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia.对姑息治疗的认知与态度:晚期痴呆症姑息治疗问卷西班牙语版本的验证
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;10(4):656. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040656.
4
Palliative care for advanced dementia in Japan: knowledge and attitudes.日本晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗:知识与态度
Br J Nurs. 2016;25(3):146-55. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.3.146.
5
A Japanese booklet about palliative care for advanced dementia in nursing homes.一本关于养老院晚期痴呆症姑息治疗的日本宣传册。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2015 Aug;21(8):385-91. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2015.21.8.385.
6
Palliative care for advanced dementia: Knowledge and attitudes of long-term care staff.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗:长期护理人员的知识和态度。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):848-858. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14132. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
7
An instrument to assess the education needs of nursing assistants within a palliative approach in residential aged care facilities.评估安养院姑息护理模式下护理助理教育需求的工具。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jul 23;18(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0447-0.
8
A screen-based simulation training program to improve palliative care of people with advanced dementia living in residential aged care facilities and reduce hospital transfers: study protocol for the IMproving Palliative care Education and Training Using Simulation in Dementia (IMPETUS-D) cluster randomised controlled trial.基于屏幕的模拟培训计划,以改善居住在养老院的晚期痴呆症患者的姑息治疗,并减少医院转介:使用模拟在痴呆症中改善姑息治疗教育和培训的研究方案(IMPETUS-D) 集群随机对照试验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 23;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0474-x.
9
Measuring knowledge of Alzheimer's: development and psychometric testing of the UJA Alzheimer's Care Scale.阿尔茨海默病知识测量:UJA 阿尔茨海默病护理量表的开发和心理测量学测试。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Mar 4;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1086-2.
10
Staff preparedness for providing palliative and end-of-life care in long-term care homes: Instrument development and validation.长期护理机构提供姑息治疗和临终关怀的员工准备情况:工具的开发和验证。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2018 May;18(5):745-749. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13244. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and reliability of the brief form of the normative male alexithymia scale among Chinese patients after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后中国患者中简版男性述情障碍常模量表的效度和信度
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 3;15(1):719. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82958-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Australian long-term care personnel's knowledge and attitudes regarding palliative care for people with advanced dementia.澳大利亚长期护理人员对晚期痴呆症患者的姑息治疗的知识和态度。
Dementia (London). 2021 Feb;20(2):427-443. doi: 10.1177/1471301219886768. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
2
A screen-based simulation training program to improve palliative care of people with advanced dementia living in residential aged care facilities and reduce hospital transfers: study protocol for the IMproving Palliative care Education and Training Using Simulation in Dementia (IMPETUS-D) cluster randomised controlled trial.基于屏幕的模拟培训计划,以改善居住在养老院的晚期痴呆症患者的姑息治疗,并减少医院转介:使用模拟在痴呆症中改善姑息治疗教育和培训的研究方案(IMPETUS-D) 集群随机对照试验。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 23;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0474-x.
3
Palliative care for advanced dementia: Knowledge and attitudes of long-term care staff.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗:长期护理人员的知识和态度。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):848-858. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14132. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
4
Effects of facilitated family case conferencing for advanced dementia: A cluster randomised clinical trial.便利式家庭病例讨论会对晚期痴呆症的影响:一项整群随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 7;12(8):e0181020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181020. eCollection 2017.
5
Dementia knowledge assessment scale (DKAS): confirmatory factor analysis and comparative subscale scores among an international cohort.痴呆知识评估量表(DKAS):国际队列中的验证性因素分析及比较子量表得分
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jul 31;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0552-y.
6
Palliative care for advanced dementia in Japan: knowledge and attitudes.日本晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗:知识与态度
Br J Nurs. 2016;25(3):146-55. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2016.25.3.146.
7
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
8
A Japanese booklet about palliative care for advanced dementia in nursing homes.一本关于养老院晚期痴呆症姑息治疗的日本宣传册。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2015 Aug;21(8):385-91. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2015.21.8.385.
9
White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: a Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care.定义老年痴呆症患者最佳姑息治疗的白皮书:来自欧洲姑息治疗协会的德尔菲研究和建议。
Palliat Med. 2014 Mar;28(3):197-209. doi: 10.1177/0269216313493685. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
10
Development of the questionnaire on palliative care for advanced dementia (qPAD).开发晚期痴呆症姑息治疗问卷(qPAD)。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2012 Nov;27(7):537-43. doi: 10.1177/1533317512459793. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

采用澳大利亚养老院工作人员的大样本,对晚期痴呆症姑息治疗问卷(qPAD)进行探索性和验证性因子分析。

Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the questionnaire on Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia (qPAD) using a large sample of staff from Australian residential aged care homes.

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Aged Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Older People Nurs. 2023 Jan;18(1):e12505. doi: 10.1111/opn.12505. Epub 2022 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1111/opn.12505
PMID:36208093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10078386/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Questionnaire on Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia (qPAD) is increasingly being used to assess residential aged care workers' knowledge and attitudes about palliative care for people with dementia. The qPAD developers performed an exploratory factor analysis and assessed the internal consistency using a small sample.

AIM

The aim of this study was to further assess the structural validity of the qPAD using a large sample of qPAD responses from staff who work in residential aged care homes in Australia.

METHODS

Data from 727 care staff who participated in an Australian dementia palliative care training project were used for exploratory factor analyses, assessment of internal consistency, and confirmatory factor analysis of the knowledge test and attitude scale components of the qPAD.

RESULTS

The exploratory factor analysis of the knowledge test produced a four-factor solution. One item loaded weakly, and four items had cross-loadings. Factor labels for the knowledge test were difficult to define. Factor analysis of the attitude scale produced a three-factor structure with good internal consistency-Feeling valued and part of the care team (α = 0.88), Family and team engagement (α = 0.75) and Perceptions and beliefs (α = 0.83). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated improvements in model fit were needed for both the knowledge test and attitude scale.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this factor analysis differed from the original study. The attitude scale produced a three-factor structure, but the knowledge test requires further development due to weak and cross-loadings of several items, inadequate internal consistency of factors and poor model fit.

摘要

背景

《晚期痴呆症姑息治疗问卷》(qPAD)越来越多地被用于评估养老院工作人员对痴呆症患者姑息治疗的知识和态度。qPAD 的开发者对一个小样本进行了探索性因素分析和内部一致性评估。

目的

本研究旨在使用来自澳大利亚养老院工作人员的大量 qPAD 应答数据,进一步评估 qPAD 的结构有效性。

方法

使用参与澳大利亚痴呆姑息治疗培训项目的 727 名护理人员的数据进行探索性因素分析、内部一致性评估以及 qPAD 的知识测试和态度量表部分的验证性因素分析。

结果

知识测试的探索性因素分析产生了四因素解决方案。一个项目的负荷较弱,四个项目的负荷交叉。知识测试的因素标签难以定义。态度量表的因子分析产生了具有良好内部一致性的三因素结构——感觉有价值且是护理团队的一部分(α=0.88)、家庭和团队参与(α=0.75)以及认知和信念(α=0.83)。验证性因素分析表明,知识测试和态度量表的模型拟合都需要改进。

结论

本次因子分析的结果与原始研究不同。态度量表产生了三因素结构,但由于几个项目的负荷较弱和交叉、因素的内部一致性不足以及模型拟合不佳,知识测试需要进一步发展。