Department of Medicine and Aged Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Int J Older People Nurs. 2023 Jan;18(1):e12505. doi: 10.1111/opn.12505. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
The Questionnaire on Palliative Care for Advanced Dementia (qPAD) is increasingly being used to assess residential aged care workers' knowledge and attitudes about palliative care for people with dementia. The qPAD developers performed an exploratory factor analysis and assessed the internal consistency using a small sample.
The aim of this study was to further assess the structural validity of the qPAD using a large sample of qPAD responses from staff who work in residential aged care homes in Australia.
Data from 727 care staff who participated in an Australian dementia palliative care training project were used for exploratory factor analyses, assessment of internal consistency, and confirmatory factor analysis of the knowledge test and attitude scale components of the qPAD.
The exploratory factor analysis of the knowledge test produced a four-factor solution. One item loaded weakly, and four items had cross-loadings. Factor labels for the knowledge test were difficult to define. Factor analysis of the attitude scale produced a three-factor structure with good internal consistency-Feeling valued and part of the care team (α = 0.88), Family and team engagement (α = 0.75) and Perceptions and beliefs (α = 0.83). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated improvements in model fit were needed for both the knowledge test and attitude scale.
The findings of this factor analysis differed from the original study. The attitude scale produced a three-factor structure, but the knowledge test requires further development due to weak and cross-loadings of several items, inadequate internal consistency of factors and poor model fit.
《晚期痴呆症姑息治疗问卷》(qPAD)越来越多地被用于评估养老院工作人员对痴呆症患者姑息治疗的知识和态度。qPAD 的开发者对一个小样本进行了探索性因素分析和内部一致性评估。
本研究旨在使用来自澳大利亚养老院工作人员的大量 qPAD 应答数据,进一步评估 qPAD 的结构有效性。
使用参与澳大利亚痴呆姑息治疗培训项目的 727 名护理人员的数据进行探索性因素分析、内部一致性评估以及 qPAD 的知识测试和态度量表部分的验证性因素分析。
知识测试的探索性因素分析产生了四因素解决方案。一个项目的负荷较弱,四个项目的负荷交叉。知识测试的因素标签难以定义。态度量表的因子分析产生了具有良好内部一致性的三因素结构——感觉有价值且是护理团队的一部分(α=0.88)、家庭和团队参与(α=0.75)以及认知和信念(α=0.83)。验证性因素分析表明,知识测试和态度量表的模型拟合都需要改进。
本次因子分析的结果与原始研究不同。态度量表产生了三因素结构,但由于几个项目的负荷较弱和交叉、因素的内部一致性不足以及模型拟合不佳,知识测试需要进一步发展。