Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Neuropsychol. 2023 Jun;17(2):364-381. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12295. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
This study examined whether an alteration in the effort-reward relationship, a theoretical framework based on cognitive neuroscience, could explain cognitive fatigue. Forty persons with MS and 40 healthy age- and education-matched cognitively healthy controls (HC) participated in a computerized switching task with orthogonal high- and low-demand (effort) and reward manipulations. We used the Visual Analog Scale of Fatigue (VAS-F) to assess subjective state fatigue before and after each condition during the task. We used mixed-effects models to estimate the association and interaction between effort and reward and their relationship to subjective fatigue and task performance. We found the high-demand condition was associated with increased VAS-F scores (p < .001), longer response times (RT) (p < .001) and lower accuracy (p < .001). The high-reward condition was associated with faster RT (p = .006) and higher accuracy (p = .03). There was no interaction effect between effort and reward on VAS-F scores or performance. Participants with MS reported higher VAS-F scores (p = .02). Across all conditions, participants with MS were slower (p < .001) and slower as a function of condition demand compared with HC (p < .001). This behavioural study did not find evidence that an effort-reward interaction is associated with cognitive fatigue. However, our findings support the role of effort in subjective cognitive fatigue and both effort and reward on task performance. In future studies, more salient reward manipulations could be necessary to identify effort-reward interactions on subjective cognitive fatigue.
这项研究旨在探究认知神经科学理论框架中的努力-回报关系的改变是否可以解释认知疲劳。40 名多发性硬化症患者和 40 名年龄和教育程度匹配的认知健康对照组(HC)参加了一项具有高需求和低需求(努力)和奖励操作的正交计算机切换任务。我们使用视觉模拟疲劳量表(VAS-F)在任务过程中评估每个条件前后的主观状态疲劳。我们使用混合效应模型来估计努力和奖励之间的关联和相互作用,以及它们与主观疲劳和任务表现的关系。我们发现高需求条件与 VAS-F 评分增加(p < .001)、反应时间延长(p < .001)和准确性降低(p < .001)有关。高回报条件与反应时间加快(p = .006)和准确性提高有关(p = .03)。努力和奖励之间没有交互作用对 VAS-F 评分或表现的影响。多发性硬化症患者的 VAS-F 评分更高(p = .02)。在所有条件下,多发性硬化症患者的反应时间都较慢(p < .001),并且随着条件需求的增加而减慢(p < .001)。这项行为研究没有发现证据表明努力-回报相互作用与认知疲劳有关。然而,我们的研究结果支持努力在主观认知疲劳中的作用,以及努力和奖励对任务表现的作用。在未来的研究中,可能需要更明显的奖励操作来确定努力-回报相互作用对主观认知疲劳的影响。