GIGA-CRC In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Research Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
GIGA-CRC In Vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Sep;65:104001. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104001. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
Cognitive fatigue (CF) is a disabling symptom frequently reported by patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). Whether pwMS in the early disease stages present an increased sensitivity to fatigue induction remains debated. Objective measures of CF have been validated neither for clinical nor research purposes. This study aimed at (i) assessing how fatigue induction by manipulation of cognitive load affects subjective fatigue and behavioural performance in newly diagnosed pwMS and matched healthy controls (HC); and (ii) exploring the relevance of eye metrics to describe CF in pwMS.
Nineteen pwMS with disease duration < 5 years and 19 matched HC participated to this study. CF was induced with a dual-task in two separate sessions with varying cognitive load (High and Low cognitive load conditions, HCL and LCL). Accuracy, reaction times (RTs), subjective fatigue and sleepiness states were assessed. Bayesian Analyses of Variance for repeated measures (rmANOVA) explored the effects of time, group and load condition on the assessed variables. Eye metrics (number of long blinks, pupil size and pupil response speed: PRS) were obtained during the CF task for a sub-sample (16 pwMS and 15 HC) and analysed with Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM).
Performance (accuracy and RTs) was lower in the HCL condition and accuracy decreased over time (BFs > 100) while RTs did not significantly vary. Performance over task and conditions followed the same pattern of evolution across groups (BFs < 0.08) suggesting that pwMS did not show increased alteration of performance during fatigue induction. Regarding subjective state, both fatigue and sleepiness increased following the task (BFs > 15), regardless of condition and group (BFs < 3). CF in pwMS seems to be associated with PRS, as PRS decreased during the task amongst pwMS only and especially in the HCL condition (all p < .05). A significant Condition*Group interaction was observed regarding long blinks (p < .0001) as well as an expected effect of cognitive load condition on pupil diameter (p < .01).
These results suggest that newly diagnosed pwMS and HC behave similarly during fatigue induction, in terms of both performance decrement and accrued fatigue sensation. Eye metric data further reveal a susceptibility to CF in pwMS, which can be objectively measured.
认知疲劳(CF)是多发性硬化症(pwMS)患者经常报告的一种致残症状。处于疾病早期阶段的 pwMS 是否对疲劳诱导更敏感仍存在争议。目前还没有针对临床或研究目的验证 CF 的客观测量方法。本研究旨在:(i)评估通过改变认知负荷来诱导疲劳对新诊断的 pwMS 患者和匹配的健康对照组(HC)的主观疲劳和行为表现的影响;(ii)探索眼动测量指标在 pwMS 中描述 CF 的相关性。
19 名疾病持续时间<5 年的 pwMS 和 19 名匹配的 HC 参与了这项研究。在两个不同的认知负荷条件(高认知负荷和低认知负荷条件,HCL 和 LCL)下,通过双重任务来诱导 CF。评估准确性、反应时间(RTs)、主观疲劳和嗜睡状态。使用重复测量方差的贝叶斯分析(rmANOVA)来探索时间、组和负荷条件对评估变量的影响。对于一个亚组(16 名 pwMS 和 15 名 HC),在 CF 任务期间获取眼动测量指标(长眨眼次数、瞳孔大小和瞳孔反应速度:PRS),并使用广义线性混合模型(GLMM)进行分析。
在 HCL 条件下,表现(准确性和 RTs)较低,准确性随着时间的推移而降低(BFs>100),而 RTs 没有显著变化。无论条件和组如何,任务和条件下的表现都遵循相同的演变模式(BFs<0.08),表明 pwMS 在疲劳诱导过程中并没有表现出更高的表现变化。关于主观状态,无论条件和组如何,疲劳和嗜睡感在任务后都会增加(BFs>15)。CF 在 pwMS 中似乎与 PRS 有关,因为 pwMS 在任务期间的 PRS 下降,尤其是在 HCL 条件下(均 p<0.05)。长眨眼的条件*组交互作用显著(p<0.0001),以及认知负荷条件对瞳孔直径的预期影响(p<0.01)。
这些结果表明,在疲劳诱导方面,新诊断的 pwMS 和 HC 的表现相似,无论是在表现下降还是疲劳感增加方面。眼动测量数据进一步揭示了 pwMS 对 CF 的易感性,可以客观地测量。