Steffen Julius, Stocker Angelika, Scherer Clemens, Haum Magda, Fischer Julius, Doldi Philipp M, Theiss Hans, Braun Daniel, Rizas Konstantinos, Peterß Sven, Hausleiter Jörg, Massberg Steffen, Orban Martin, Deseive Simon
Department of Medicine I, LMU Klinikum, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany.
German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich, Germany.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Dec 27;11(12):877-886. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac131.
Severe aortic stenosis can cause acute heart failure and cardiogenic shock (CS). Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the standard therapy for aortic stenosis in inoperable patients. However, its role in this setting is poorly evaluated. The study purpose was to explore clinical characteristics of these patients and to assess predictors of mortality.
All 2930 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI at our centre between 2013 and 2019 were screened for critically ill patients, receiving intensive care therapy and emergency TAVI. Selected patients were subdivided into two groups, according to the presence or absence of CS. Remaining patients undergoing elective TAVI served as a comparison. Primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Out of 179 critically ill patients, 47 fulfilled criteria of CS (shock group) and 132 did not despite a severe decompensation (no shock group). Shock patients were more often male and had higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons scores [15.6, interquartile range (8.0-32.1) vs. 5.5 (3.9-8.5), P < 0.01] compared with severely decompensated patients. Ninety-day mortality was: shock group, 42.6%, vs. no shock group, 15.9%, vs. elective group, 5.3% (P < 0.01). A landmark analysis from day 90 showed similar mortality (P = 0.29). Compared with elective patients, 30-day composite endpoint device failure was higher in critically ill groups [shock group, odds ratio, 2.86 (1.43-5.36), no shock group, odds ratio, 1.74 (1.09-2.69)]. Multivariable regression revealed mechanical ventilation, haemofiltration, elevated C-reactive protein or bilirubin, and hypotension before TAVI as 90-day mortality predictors.
Ninety-day mortality after TAVI in critically ill patients is increased but survivors have similar outcomes as elective patients.
严重主动脉瓣狭窄可导致急性心力衰竭和心源性休克(CS)。经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)是无法手术患者主动脉瓣狭窄的标准治疗方法。然而,其在这种情况下的作用评估不足。本研究目的是探讨这些患者的临床特征并评估死亡率的预测因素。
对2013年至2019年间在本中心接受经股动脉TAVI的所有2930例患者进行筛选,找出危重症患者,这些患者接受重症监护治疗并进行急诊TAVI。根据是否存在CS将入选患者分为两组。其余接受择期TAVI的患者作为对照。主要结局是90天死亡率。在179例危重症患者中,47例符合CS标准(休克组),132例尽管有严重失代偿但不符合CS标准(无休克组)。与严重失代偿患者相比,休克患者男性更常见,胸外科医师协会评分更高[15.6,四分位间距(8.0 - 32.1)对5.5(3.9 - 8.5),P < 0.01]。90天死亡率为:休克组42.6%,无休克组15.9%,择期组5.3%(P < 0.01)。90天的标志性分析显示死亡率相似(P = 0.29)。与择期患者相比,危重症组30天复合终点器械故障更高[休克组,比值比,2.86(1.43 - 5.36),无休克组,比值比,1.74(1.09 - 2.69)]。多变量回归显示机械通气、血液滤过、TAVI前C反应蛋白或胆红素升高以及低血压是90天死亡率的预测因素。
危重症患者TAVI后90天死亡率增加,但幸存者的结局与择期患者相似。