• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

因急性失代偿性主动脉瓣狭窄导致心原性休克的患者行紧急经导管主动脉瓣置换术。

Emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acutely decompensated aortic stenosis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik, St. Georg Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2016 Apr 20;11(13):1530-6. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M03_03.

DOI:10.4244/EIJY15M03_03
PMID:25751886
Abstract

AIMS

To assess outcomes of TAVR as a rescue therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acutely decompensated aortic stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Of 771 high-risk patients who underwent TAVR, 27 (3.5%; 78±9 years; 12 men) were treated emergently due to acutely decompensated aortic stenosis with cardiogenic shock. SAPIEN and CoreValve prostheses were implanted in 11 and 16 patients, respectively: the transfemoral access route was used in 25. Three patients died within 72 hours of successful valve deployment, and a further six died within a month, giving a 30-day mortality of 33.3%, which was significantly higher than in electively treated patients (7.7%, p<0.0001). Univariate predictors of 30-day mortality in cardiogenic-shock patients were baseline cardiac output <3.0 l/min, reduced cardiac power index, impaired renal function, and mechanical ventilation, as well as severe acute kidney injury after TAVR. Estimated one-year survival was 59.3% in emergently and 82.7% in electively treated patients (p=0.0009). However, 30-day landmark analysis showed no difference in cumulative survival between TAVR modalities. In cardiogenic-shock patients without concomitant reduced cardiac output and impaired renal function at baseline (n=22), estimated one-year survival was 72.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

TAVR should be considered a reasonable rescue therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock secondary to decompensated aortic stenosis.

摘要

目的

评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)作为急性失代偿性主动脉瓣狭窄合并心源性休克患者的抢救治疗的效果。

方法和结果

在接受 TAVR 的 771 例高危患者中,有 27 例(3.5%;78±9 岁;12 名男性)因急性失代偿性主动脉瓣狭窄合并心源性休克而紧急接受治疗。分别有 11 例和 16 例患者植入了 SAPIEN 和 CoreValve 瓣膜:25 例患者采用经股动脉入路。3 例患者在成功植入瓣膜后 72 小时内死亡,另外 6 例在一个月内死亡,30 天死亡率为 33.3%,明显高于择期治疗患者(7.7%,p<0.0001)。心源性休克患者 30 天死亡率的单因素预测因子包括基线心输出量<3.0 l/min、心功率指数降低、肾功能受损和机械通气,以及 TAVR 后发生严重急性肾损伤。紧急治疗和择期治疗患者的估计一年生存率分别为 59.3%和 82.7%(p=0.0009)。然而,30 天标志分析显示两种 TAVR 方式的累积生存率无差异。在基线时无合并心输出量降低和肾功能受损的心源性休克患者(n=22)中,估计一年生存率为 72.7%。

结论

对于因失代偿性主动脉瓣狭窄导致的心源性休克患者,TAVR 可作为一种合理的抢救治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with cardiogenic shock due to acutely decompensated aortic stenosis.因急性失代偿性主动脉瓣狭窄导致心原性休克的患者行紧急经导管主动脉瓣置换术。
EuroIntervention. 2016 Apr 20;11(13):1530-6. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M03_03.
2
Outcomes of Emergency Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.急诊经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果。
J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Nov 3;2019:7598581. doi: 10.1155/2019/7598581. eCollection 2019.
3
Outcomes of emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with cardiogenic shock: A multicenter retrospective study.心原性休克患者急诊经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结果:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun;99(7):2117-2124. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30194. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
4
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for aortic bioprosthetic valve failure with cardiogenic shock.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗生物主动脉瓣功能衰竭合并心源性休克
J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 Nov;25(11):625-6.
5
Emergency transcatheter aortic valve implantation for acute heart failure due to severe aortic stenosis in critically ill patients with or without cardiogenic shock.针对伴有或不伴有心源性休克的危重症患者因严重主动脉瓣狭窄导致的急性心力衰竭进行紧急经导管主动脉瓣植入术。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Dec 27;11(12):877-886. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac131.
6
Trends in invasive treatment of patients hospitalized with aortic stenosis complicated by cardiogenic shock.因心原性休克而住院的主动脉瓣狭窄患者的侵入性治疗趋势。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;100(6):1110-1116. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30413. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
7
Retrospective analysis of Advanced Heart Failure and/or Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Aortic Valve Stenosis Treated by Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and a Nomogram Model Construction.经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗主动脉瓣狭窄伴发心力衰竭和/或心原性休克患者的回顾性分析及列线图模型构建。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2024 May;30(5):118-122.
8
Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Urgent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Under a Minimalist Strategy.采用简化策略进行紧急经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的短期和长期预后
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Feb;31(2):E30-E36. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00221.
9
A Dilemma in the Extremely Low-Placed Venus A-Valve in a Cardiogenic Shock Patient.心源性休克患者极低位置的三尖瓣前叶瓣面临的困境
Heart Surg Forum. 2021 Mar 5;24(2):E256-E260. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3517.
10
In-hospital outcomes comparison of transfemoral vs transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in propensity-matched cohorts with severe aortic stenosis.倾向评分匹配队列中,经股动脉与经心尖经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的院内结局比较
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):326-332. doi: 10.1002/clc.22866. Epub 2018 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Cardiogenic Shock: Current Evidence, Clinical Challenges, and Future Directions.心源性休克中的经导管主动脉瓣植入术:当前证据、临床挑战及未来方向
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 31;14(15):5398. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155398.
2
Emergency interventions for cardiogenic shock due to decompensated aortic stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.失代偿性主动脉瓣狭窄所致心源性休克的紧急干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Open Heart. 2025 Jan 19;12(1):e003110. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-003110.
3
Transcatheter Structural Heart Interventions in the Acute Setting: An Emerging Indication.
急性情况下的经导管结构性心脏介入治疗:一种新兴的适应症。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 16;13(12):3528. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123528.
4
Cardiovascular outcomes of emergent vs elective transcatheter aortic valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis: regression matched meta-analysis.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者急诊与择期经导管主动脉瓣置换术的心血管结局:回归匹配荟萃分析
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024 Apr 15;14(2):54-69. doi: 10.62347/PORE5631. eCollection 2024.
5
Comparison of Contemporary Treatment Strategies in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Due to Severe Aortic Stenosis.比较严重主动脉瓣狭窄导致心原性休克患者的当代治疗策略。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 21;13(10):e033601. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033601. Epub 2024 May 18.
6
Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review.心源性休克的管理:一篇叙述性综述。
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Mar 30;14(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01260-y.
7
Feasibility of emergent transcatheter aortic valve replacement sequentially followed by cardiac computed tomography angiography: experience from the procedure.急诊经导管主动脉瓣置换术后序贯心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影的可行性:该手术的经验
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2023 Aug 28;20(8):602-607. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2023.08.002.
8
Transcatheter interventions for left-sided valvular heart disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) in collaboration with the Association for Acute Cardiovascular Care (ACVC) and the ESC Working Group on Cardiovascular Surgery.经导管介入治疗左心瓣膜性心脏病合并心源性休克:欧洲经皮心血管介入学会(EAPCI)与急性心血管护理协会(ACVC)和 ESC 心血管外科学工作组合作的共识声明。
EuroIntervention. 2023 Oct 23;19(8):634-651. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00473.
9
In-hospital Outcomes and the Impact of Transfer Status in Nonelective vs Elective Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.非选择性与选择性经导管主动脉瓣置换术的院内结局及转运状态的影响
CJC Open. 2023 Mar 11;5(6):472-479. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.03.005. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Acute advanced aortic stenosis.急性重度主动脉瓣狭窄。
Heart Fail Rev. 2023 Sep;28(5):1101-1111. doi: 10.1007/s10741-023-10312-7. Epub 2023 Apr 21.