Li Junrong, Ling Fangmei, Guo Di, Zhao Jinfang, Cheng Ling, Chen Yidong, Xu Mingyang, Zhu Liangru
Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Department of Geriatrics, Wuhan Central Hospital, Wuhan, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 23;13:989654. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.989654. eCollection 2022.
Nonspecific terminal ileal ulcers are one of the common ulcerative diseases in terminal ileum. However, the studies about treatment efficacy are scarce. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of mesalazine in the treatment of this disease. Eighty-two patients with nonspecific terminal ileal ulcers who sought outpatient medical treatment in the Division of Gastroenterology, Wuhan Union Hospital, from April 2016 to January 2019 were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. The experimental group took mesalazine orally, 4.0 g/d, once a day for 3 months. The control group was followed up without special intervention. The primary endpoint was the endoscopic remission rate at the 6 and 12 month. Secondary endpoints included the clinical remission rate at the 1, 6 and 12 month and adverse events (ChiCTR1900027503). About the endoscopic efficacy, the remission rate of the experimental group and control group was 73.2 versus 61.0% at the 6 month (RR = 1.20, 95%CI 0.88∼1.63, = 0.24) and 87.8 versus 78.0% at the 12 month (RR = 1.13, 95%CI 0.92∼1.37, = 0.24). About the clinical efficacy, the remission rate was 70.3 versus 43.8% at the 1 month (RR = 1.61, 95%CI 1.03∼2.51, = 0.03), 83.8 versus 68.8% at the 6 month (RR = 1.22, 95%CI 0.93∼1.60, = 0.14) and 91.9 versus 81.3% at the 12 month (RR = 1.13, 95%CI 0.93∼1.37, = 0.34). During follow-up, no patients were diagnosed with Crohn's disease or intestinal tuberculosis, and no patients developed significant complications. For patients with nonspecific terminal ileal ulcers, there is no disease progression over a short term. In addition, there is no significant difference in clinical or endoscopic efficacy between patients who received mesalazine and patients who are followed up without special intervention.
非特异性回肠末端溃疡是回肠末端常见的溃疡性疾病之一。然而,关于其治疗效果的研究较少。我们旨在探讨美沙拉嗪治疗该疾病的疗效。选取2016年4月至2019年1月在武汉协和医院消化内科门诊就诊的82例非特异性回肠末端溃疡患者,将其随机分为两组。试验组口服美沙拉嗪,4.0 g/d,每日1次,共3个月。对照组仅进行随访,未给予特殊干预。主要终点为6个月和12个月时的内镜缓解率。次要终点包括1个月、6个月和12个月时的临床缓解率以及不良事件(中国临床试验注册中心注册号:ChiCTR1900027503)。在内镜疗效方面,试验组和对照组在6个月时的缓解率分别为73.2%和61.0%(RR = 1.20,95%CI 0.88~1.63,P = 0.24),在12个月时分别为87.8%和78.0%(RR = 1.13,95%CI 0.92~1.37,P = 0.24)。在临床疗效方面,试验组和对照组在1个月时的缓解率分别为70.3%和43.8%(RR = 1.61,95%CI 1.03~2.51,P = 0.03),在6个月时分别为83.8%和68.8%(RR = 1.22,95%CI 0.93~1.60,P = 0.14),在12个月时分别为91.9%和81.3%(RR = 1.13,95%CI 0.93~1.37,P = 0.34)。随访期间,无患者被诊断为克罗恩病或肠结核,也无患者发生严重并发症。对于非特异性回肠末端溃疡患者,短期内病情无进展。此外,接受美沙拉嗪治疗的患者与未接受特殊干预仅进行随访的患者在临床疗效或内镜疗效方面无显著差异。