Foti Caterina, Calogiuri Gianfranco, Nettis Eustachio, De Marco Aurora, Stingeni Luca, Hansel Katharina, Di Bona Danilo, Carlucci Palma, Romita Paolo, Barbaud Annick
Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Dermatological Clinic University of Bari Aldo Moro Bari Italy.
Temporarily assigned to Pneumology Department for the COVID19 Emergency Civil Hospital Vito Fazzi Lecce Italy.
Health Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 3;5(6):e766. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.766. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Vitamins are bioactive compounds naturally found in many different types of food and required by the human body for many biological functions and enzymatic activities. Due to their antioxidant properties, certain vitamin derivatives have been synthesized for inclusion in many cosmetics, thus leading to an increasing incidence of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) cases. Therefore, the present review may be helpful to provide an insight into the sensitizing role of at least certain vitamins and may also offer possible patch test alternatives for definitive diagnosis.
This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Literature search regarding ACD cases to vitamins was performed using the Medline, PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases from January 1940 up to June 2021.
A total of 4494 articles matched the keywords used for the researched. Records removed before screening included 15 duplicate articles and 3429 not eligible articles (e.g., not written in English, studies on animals, not relevant to the topic). A total of 1050 articles underwent the screening phase and 258 were therefore excluded as they were not primary studies. Subsequentially, 792 articles were considered eligible for the review and 688 of them were finally excluded as they did not report the outcome of interest. Therefore, 104 articles were definitely included in the present review.
ACD to vitamins is still probably an underestimated issue in cosmetology, as many vitamins are considered "natural" and therefore "safe" ingredients. On the contrary, according to current literature, almost all vitamins contained in topical products are able to induce allergic reactions, with the exception of vitamin B2 and vitamin B9. Patch tests are not standardized, thus leading to difficulties in diagnosis.
维生素是天然存在于多种不同类型食物中的生物活性化合物,人体需要它们来实现多种生物学功能和酶促活性。由于其抗氧化特性,某些维生素衍生物已被合成并添加到许多化妆品中,从而导致过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)病例的发病率不断上升。因此,本综述可能有助于深入了解至少某些维生素的致敏作用,也可能为明确诊断提供可能的斑贴试验替代方法。
本研究按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。使用Medline、PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE和谷歌学术数据库,对1940年1月至2021年6月期间关于维生素引起的ACD病例的文献进行检索。
共有4494篇文章与研究使用的关键词匹配。筛选前剔除的记录包括15篇重复文章和3429篇不符合条件的文章(如非英文撰写、动物研究、与主题无关)。共有1050篇文章进入筛选阶段,其中258篇因不是原始研究而被排除。随后,792篇文章被认为符合综述要求,其中688篇因未报告感兴趣的结果而最终被排除。因此,本综述最终纳入104篇文章。
在美容学中,维生素引起的ACD可能仍是一个被低估的问题,因为许多维生素被认为是“天然的”,因此是“安全的”成分。相反,根据当前文献,除维生素B2和维生素B9外,局部产品中含有的几乎所有维生素都能够引发过敏反应。斑贴试验未标准化,因此导致诊断困难。